| commit | 06a96b33aea838b61a6eeccded781a305cf85a12 | [log] [tgz] |
|---|---|---|
| author | roel kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com> | Wed Oct 07 00:59:42 2009 +0000 |
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | Tue Oct 13 03:44:07 2009 -0700 |
| tree | 0779090d15ab5827bede0ffcbfb6b817fd784ed7 | |
| parent | f14d42f314cb45a080bf84ecadf8b9b1eebbe9fd [diff] |
x25: bit and/or confusion in x25_ioctl()? Looking at commit ebc3f64b864f it appears that this was intended and not the original, equivalent to `if (facilities.reverse & ~0x81)'. In x25_parse_facilities() that patch changed how facilities->reverse was set. No other bits were set than 0x80 and/or 0x01. Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>