x86/entry: Clarify the RF saving/restoring situation with SYSCALL/SYSRET
Clarify why exactly RF cannot be restored properly by SYSRET to avoid
confusion.
No functionality change.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160803171429.GA2590@nazgul.tnic
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
index 9f85827..d172c61 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
@@ -288,11 +288,15 @@
jne opportunistic_sysret_failed
/*
- * SYSRET can't restore RF. SYSRET can restore TF, but unlike IRET,
- * restoring TF results in a trap from userspace immediately after
- * SYSRET. This would cause an infinite loop whenever #DB happens
- * with register state that satisfies the opportunistic SYSRET
- * conditions. For example, single-stepping this user code:
+ * SYSCALL clears RF when it saves RFLAGS in R11 and SYSRET cannot
+ * restore RF properly. If the slowpath sets it for whatever reason, we
+ * need to restore it correctly.
+ *
+ * SYSRET can restore TF, but unlike IRET, restoring TF results in a
+ * trap from userspace immediately after SYSRET. This would cause an
+ * infinite loop whenever #DB happens with register state that satisfies
+ * the opportunistic SYSRET conditions. For example, single-stepping
+ * this user code:
*
* movq $stuck_here, %rcx
* pushfq
