drbd: drop wrong debugging aid
The textual representation of resync extents in /proc/drbd presented
with proc_details >= 3 was wrong, it used bitnumbers as bitmasks.
It was not particularly useful either, and I doubt anyone has even tried
to look at it in the last few years. Drop it.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c
index f11e573..46bb8dd 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_proc.c
@@ -188,16 +188,6 @@
}
}
-static void resync_dump_detail(struct seq_file *seq, struct lc_element *e)
-{
- struct bm_extent *bme = lc_entry(e, struct bm_extent, lce);
-
- seq_printf(seq, "%5d %s %s\n", bme->rs_left,
- bme->flags & BME_NO_WRITES ? "NO_WRITES" : "---------",
- bme->flags & BME_LOCKED ? "LOCKED" : "------"
- );
-}
-
static int drbd_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
{
int i, prev_i = -1;
@@ -298,13 +288,6 @@
lc_seq_printf_stats(seq, device->act_log);
put_ldev(device);
}
-
- if (proc_details >= 2) {
- if (device->resync) {
- lc_seq_dump_details(seq, device->resync, "rs_left",
- resync_dump_detail);
- }
- }
}
rcu_read_unlock();