workqueue: fix typos in comments
tj: dropped iff -> if, iff is if and only if not a typo. Spotted by
Randy Dunlap.
Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index c9eaa4e..5243d4b 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -988,7 +988,7 @@
* move_linked_works - move linked works to a list
* @work: start of series of works to be scheduled
* @head: target list to append @work to
- * @nextp: out paramter for nested worklist walking
+ * @nextp: out parameter for nested worklist walking
*
* Schedule linked works starting from @work to @head. Work series to
* be scheduled starts at @work and includes any consecutive work with
@@ -3063,7 +3063,7 @@
* init_worker_pool - initialize a newly zalloc'd worker_pool
* @pool: worker_pool to initialize
*
- * Initiailize a newly zalloc'd @pool. It also allocates @pool->attrs.
+ * Initialize a newly zalloc'd @pool. It also allocates @pool->attrs.
*
* Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure. Even on failure, all fields
* inside @pool proper are initialized and put_unbound_pool() can be called
@@ -4414,7 +4414,7 @@
/*
* Restore CPU affinity of all workers. As all idle workers should
* be on the run-queue of the associated CPU before any local
- * wake-ups for concurrency management happen, restore CPU affinty
+ * wake-ups for concurrency management happen, restore CPU affinity
* of all workers first and then clear UNBOUND. As we're called
* from CPU_ONLINE, the following shouldn't fail.
*/
@@ -5105,7 +5105,7 @@
int ret;
/*
- * Adjusting max_active or creating new pwqs by applyting
+ * Adjusting max_active or creating new pwqs by applying
* attributes breaks ordering guarantee. Disallow exposing ordered
* workqueues.
*/
