cxl/core: Fix potential payload size confusion in cxl_mem_get_poison()
A recent change to cxl_mem_get_records_log() [1] highlighted a subtle
nuance of looping calls to cxl_internal_send_cmd(), i.e. that
cxl_internal_send_cmd() modifies the 'size_out' member of the @mbox_cmd
argument. That mechanism is useful for communicating underflow, but it
is unwanted when reusing @mbox_cmd for a subsequent submission. It turns
out that cxl_xfer_log() avoids this scenario by always redefining
@mbox_cmd each iteration.
Update cxl_mem_get_records_log() and cxl_mem_get_poison() to follow the
same style as cxl_xfer_log(), i.e. re-define @mbox_cmd each iteration.
The cxl_mem_get_records_log() change is just a style fixup, but the
cxl_mem_get_poison() change is a potential fix, per Alison [2]:
Poison list retrieval can hit this case if the MORE flag is set and
a follow on read of the list delivers more records than the previous
read. ie. device gives one record, sets the _MORE flag, then gives 5.
Not an urgent fix since this behavior has not been seen in the wild,
but worth tracking as a fix.
Cc: Kwangjin Ko <kwangjin.ko@sk.com>
Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Fixes: ed83f7ca398b ("cxl/mbox: Add GET_POISON_LIST mailbox command")
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/20240402081404.1106-2-kwangjin.ko@sk.com [1]
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/ZhAhAL/GOaWFrauw@aschofie-mobl2 [2]
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/171235441633.2716581.12330082428680958635.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
index f0f54aec..65185c9 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
@@ -946,25 +946,22 @@ static void cxl_mem_get_records_log(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds,
struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = mds->cxlds.cxlmd;
struct device *dev = mds->cxlds.dev;
struct cxl_get_event_payload *payload;
- struct cxl_mbox_cmd mbox_cmd;
u8 log_type = type;
u16 nr_rec;
mutex_lock(&mds->event.log_lock);
payload = mds->event.buf;
- mbox_cmd = (struct cxl_mbox_cmd) {
- .opcode = CXL_MBOX_OP_GET_EVENT_RECORD,
- .payload_in = &log_type,
- .size_in = sizeof(log_type),
- .payload_out = payload,
- .min_out = struct_size(payload, records, 0),
- };
-
do {
int rc, i;
-
- mbox_cmd.size_out = mds->payload_size;
+ struct cxl_mbox_cmd mbox_cmd = (struct cxl_mbox_cmd) {
+ .opcode = CXL_MBOX_OP_GET_EVENT_RECORD,
+ .payload_in = &log_type,
+ .size_in = sizeof(log_type),
+ .payload_out = payload,
+ .size_out = mds->payload_size,
+ .min_out = struct_size(payload, records, 0),
+ };
rc = cxl_internal_send_cmd(mds, &mbox_cmd);
if (rc) {
@@ -1297,7 +1294,6 @@ int cxl_mem_get_poison(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, u64 offset, u64 len,
struct cxl_memdev_state *mds = to_cxl_memdev_state(cxlmd->cxlds);
struct cxl_mbox_poison_out *po;
struct cxl_mbox_poison_in pi;
- struct cxl_mbox_cmd mbox_cmd;
int nr_records = 0;
int rc;
@@ -1309,16 +1305,16 @@ int cxl_mem_get_poison(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, u64 offset, u64 len,
pi.offset = cpu_to_le64(offset);
pi.length = cpu_to_le64(len / CXL_POISON_LEN_MULT);
- mbox_cmd = (struct cxl_mbox_cmd) {
- .opcode = CXL_MBOX_OP_GET_POISON,
- .size_in = sizeof(pi),
- .payload_in = &pi,
- .size_out = mds->payload_size,
- .payload_out = po,
- .min_out = struct_size(po, record, 0),
- };
-
do {
+ struct cxl_mbox_cmd mbox_cmd = (struct cxl_mbox_cmd){
+ .opcode = CXL_MBOX_OP_GET_POISON,
+ .size_in = sizeof(pi),
+ .payload_in = &pi,
+ .size_out = mds->payload_size,
+ .payload_out = po,
+ .min_out = struct_size(po, record, 0),
+ };
+
rc = cxl_internal_send_cmd(mds, &mbox_cmd);
if (rc)
break;
