drivers/block/loop.c: remove unnecessary bdev argument from loop_clr_fd()
If the loop device is associated (lo->lo_state == Lo_bound), it will have
a valid bdev pointed to by lo->lo_device. There is no reason to ever pass
an additional block_device pointer.
Signed-off-by: Ayan George <ayan.george@canonical.com>
Cc: Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index c2ce03c..9b2f5d3 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -1051,10 +1051,11 @@
return err;
}
-static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo, struct block_device *bdev)
+static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
{
struct file *filp = lo->lo_backing_file;
gfp_t gfp = lo->old_gfp_mask;
+ struct block_device *bdev = lo->lo_device;
if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
return -ENXIO;
@@ -1372,7 +1373,7 @@
break;
case LOOP_CLR_FD:
/* loop_clr_fd would have unlocked lo_ctl_mutex on success */
- err = loop_clr_fd(lo, bdev);
+ err = loop_clr_fd(lo);
if (!err)
goto out_unlocked;
break;
@@ -1583,7 +1584,7 @@
* In autoclear mode, stop the loop thread
* and remove configuration after last close.
*/
- err = loop_clr_fd(lo, lo->lo_device);
+ err = loop_clr_fd(lo);
if (!err)
goto out_unlocked;
} else {
