[ROSE]: Fix routing table locking in rose_remove_neigh.
The locking rule for rose_remove_neigh() are that the caller needs to
hold rose_neigh_list_lock, so we better don't take it yet again in
rose_neigh_list_lock.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/net/rose/rose_route.c b/net/rose/rose_route.c
index 4cb6bfa..a22542f 100644
--- a/net/rose/rose_route.c
+++ b/net/rose/rose_route.c
@@ -233,11 +233,8 @@
skb_queue_purge(&rose_neigh->queue);
- spin_lock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
-
if ((s = rose_neigh_list) == rose_neigh) {
rose_neigh_list = rose_neigh->next;
- spin_unlock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
kfree(rose_neigh->digipeat);
kfree(rose_neigh);
return;
@@ -246,7 +243,6 @@
while (s != NULL && s->next != NULL) {
if (s->next == rose_neigh) {
s->next = rose_neigh->next;
- spin_unlock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
kfree(rose_neigh->digipeat);
kfree(rose_neigh);
return;
@@ -254,7 +250,6 @@
s = s->next;
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
}
/*
