swap_info: swap count continuations
Swap is duplicated (reference count incremented by one) whenever the same
swap page is inserted into another mm (when forking finds a swap entry in
place of a pte, or when reclaim unmaps a pte to insert the swap entry).
swap_info_struct's vmalloc'ed swap_map is the array of these reference
counts: but what happens when the unsigned short (or unsigned char since
the preceding patch) is full? (and its high bit is kept for a cache flag)
We then lose track of it, never freeing, leaving it in use until swapoff:
at which point we _hope_ that a single pass will have found all instances,
assume there are no more, and will lose user data if we're wrong.
Swapping of KSM pages has not yet been enabled; but it is implemented,
and makes it very easy for a user to overflow the maximum swap count:
possible with ordinary process pages, but unlikely, even when pid_max
has been raised from PID_MAX_DEFAULT.
This patch implements swap count continuations: when the count overflows,
a continuation page is allocated and linked to the original vmalloc'ed
map page, and this used to hold the continuation counts for that entry
and its neighbours. These continuation pages are seldom referenced:
the common paths all work on the original swap_map, only referring to
a continuation page when the low "digit" of a count is incremented or
decremented through SWAP_MAP_MAX.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index c0d7b9ed..cc5e7eb 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -35,11 +35,14 @@
#include <linux/swapops.h>
#include <linux/page_cgroup.h>
+static bool swap_count_continued(struct swap_info_struct *, pgoff_t,
+ unsigned char);
+static void free_swap_count_continuations(struct swap_info_struct *);
+
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(swap_lock);
static unsigned int nr_swapfiles;
long nr_swap_pages;
long total_swap_pages;
-static int swap_overflow;
static int least_priority;
static const char Bad_file[] = "Bad swap file entry ";
@@ -55,7 +58,7 @@
static inline unsigned char swap_count(unsigned char ent)
{
- return ent & ~SWAP_HAS_CACHE;
+ return ent & ~SWAP_HAS_CACHE; /* may include SWAP_HAS_CONT flag */
}
/* returns 1 if swap entry is freed */
@@ -545,8 +548,15 @@
if (usage == SWAP_HAS_CACHE) {
VM_BUG_ON(!has_cache);
has_cache = 0;
- } else if (count < SWAP_MAP_MAX)
- count--;
+ } else if ((count & ~COUNT_CONTINUED) <= SWAP_MAP_MAX) {
+ if (count == COUNT_CONTINUED) {
+ if (swap_count_continued(p, offset, count))
+ count = SWAP_MAP_MAX | COUNT_CONTINUED;
+ else
+ count = SWAP_MAP_MAX;
+ } else
+ count--;
+ }
if (!count)
mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap(entry);
@@ -604,6 +614,8 @@
/*
* How many references to page are currently swapped out?
+ * This does not give an exact answer when swap count is continued,
+ * but does include the high COUNT_CONTINUED flag to allow for that.
*/
static inline int page_swapcount(struct page *page)
{
@@ -1019,7 +1031,6 @@
swp_entry_t entry;
unsigned int i = 0;
int retval = 0;
- int reset_overflow = 0;
int shmem;
/*
@@ -1034,8 +1045,7 @@
* together, child after parent. If we race with dup_mmap(), we
* prefer to resolve parent before child, lest we miss entries
* duplicated after we scanned child: using last mm would invert
- * that. Though it's only a serious concern when an overflowed
- * swap count is reset from SWAP_MAP_MAX, preventing a rescan.
+ * that.
*/
start_mm = &init_mm;
atomic_inc(&init_mm.mm_users);
@@ -1165,36 +1175,6 @@
}
/*
- * How could swap count reach 0x7ffe ?
- * There's no way to repeat a swap page within an mm
- * (except in shmem, where it's the shared object which takes
- * the reference count)?
- * We believe SWAP_MAP_MAX cannot occur.(if occur, unsigned
- * short is too small....)
- * If that's wrong, then we should worry more about
- * exit_mmap() and do_munmap() cases described above:
- * we might be resetting SWAP_MAP_MAX too early here.
- *
- * Yes, that's wrong: though very unlikely, swap count 0x7ffe
- * could surely occur if pid_max raised from PID_MAX_DEFAULT;
- * and we are now lowering SWAP_MAP_MAX to 0x7e, making it
- * much easier to reach. But the next patch will fix that.
- *
- * We know "Undead"s can happen, they're okay, so don't
- * report them; but do report if we reset SWAP_MAP_MAX.
- */
- /* We might release the lock_page() in unuse_mm(). */
- if (!PageSwapCache(page) || page_private(page) != entry.val)
- goto retry;
-
- if (swap_count(*swap_map) == SWAP_MAP_MAX) {
- spin_lock(&swap_lock);
- *swap_map = SWAP_HAS_CACHE;
- spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
- reset_overflow = 1;
- }
-
- /*
* If a reference remains (rare), we would like to leave
* the page in the swap cache; but try_to_unmap could
* then re-duplicate the entry once we drop page lock,
@@ -1235,7 +1215,6 @@
* mark page dirty so shrink_page_list will preserve it.
*/
SetPageDirty(page);
-retry:
unlock_page(page);
page_cache_release(page);
@@ -1247,10 +1226,6 @@
}
mmput(start_mm);
- if (reset_overflow) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "swapoff: cleared swap entry overflow\n");
- swap_overflow = 0;
- }
return retval;
}
@@ -1593,6 +1568,9 @@
up_write(&swap_unplug_sem);
destroy_swap_extents(p);
+ if (p->flags & SWP_CONTINUED)
+ free_swap_count_continuations(p);
+
mutex_lock(&swapon_mutex);
spin_lock(&swap_lock);
drain_mmlist();
@@ -2079,14 +2057,13 @@
/*
* Verify that a swap entry is valid and increment its swap map count.
*
- * Note: if swap_map[] reaches SWAP_MAP_MAX the entries are treated as
- * "permanent", but will be reclaimed by the next swapoff.
* Returns error code in following case.
* - success -> 0
* - swp_entry is invalid -> EINVAL
* - swp_entry is migration entry -> EINVAL
* - swap-cache reference is requested but there is already one. -> EEXIST
* - swap-cache reference is requested but the entry is not used. -> ENOENT
+ * - swap-mapped reference requested but needs continued swap count. -> ENOMEM
*/
static int __swap_duplicate(swp_entry_t entry, unsigned char usage)
{
@@ -2126,15 +2103,14 @@
} else if (count || has_cache) {
- if (count < SWAP_MAP_MAX - 1)
- count++;
- else if (count <= SWAP_MAP_MAX) {
- if (swap_overflow++ < 5)
- printk(KERN_WARNING
- "swap_dup: swap entry overflow\n");
- count = SWAP_MAP_MAX;
- } else
+ if ((count & ~COUNT_CONTINUED) < SWAP_MAP_MAX)
+ count += usage;
+ else if ((count & ~COUNT_CONTINUED) > SWAP_MAP_MAX)
err = -EINVAL;
+ else if (swap_count_continued(p, offset, count))
+ count = COUNT_CONTINUED;
+ else
+ err = -ENOMEM;
} else
err = -ENOENT; /* unused swap entry */
@@ -2153,9 +2129,13 @@
/*
* increase reference count of swap entry by 1.
*/
-void swap_duplicate(swp_entry_t entry)
+int swap_duplicate(swp_entry_t entry)
{
- __swap_duplicate(entry, 1);
+ int err = 0;
+
+ while (!err && __swap_duplicate(entry, 1) == -ENOMEM)
+ err = add_swap_count_continuation(entry, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ return err;
}
/*
@@ -2222,3 +2202,219 @@
*offset = ++toff;
return nr_pages? ++nr_pages: 0;
}
+
+/*
+ * add_swap_count_continuation - called when a swap count is duplicated
+ * beyond SWAP_MAP_MAX, it allocates a new page and links that to the entry's
+ * page of the original vmalloc'ed swap_map, to hold the continuation count
+ * (for that entry and for its neighbouring PAGE_SIZE swap entries). Called
+ * again when count is duplicated beyond SWAP_MAP_MAX * SWAP_CONT_MAX, etc.
+ *
+ * These continuation pages are seldom referenced: the common paths all work
+ * on the original swap_map, only referring to a continuation page when the
+ * low "digit" of a count is incremented or decremented through SWAP_MAP_MAX.
+ *
+ * add_swap_count_continuation(, GFP_ATOMIC) can be called while holding
+ * page table locks; if it fails, add_swap_count_continuation(, GFP_KERNEL)
+ * can be called after dropping locks.
+ */
+int add_swap_count_continuation(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask)
+{
+ struct swap_info_struct *si;
+ struct page *head;
+ struct page *page;
+ struct page *list_page;
+ pgoff_t offset;
+ unsigned char count;
+
+ /*
+ * When debugging, it's easier to use __GFP_ZERO here; but it's better
+ * for latency not to zero a page while GFP_ATOMIC and holding locks.
+ */
+ page = alloc_page(gfp_mask | __GFP_HIGHMEM);
+
+ si = swap_info_get(entry);
+ if (!si) {
+ /*
+ * An acceptable race has occurred since the failing
+ * __swap_duplicate(): the swap entry has been freed,
+ * perhaps even the whole swap_map cleared for swapoff.
+ */
+ goto outer;
+ }
+
+ offset = swp_offset(entry);
+ count = si->swap_map[offset] & ~SWAP_HAS_CACHE;
+
+ if ((count & ~COUNT_CONTINUED) != SWAP_MAP_MAX) {
+ /*
+ * The higher the swap count, the more likely it is that tasks
+ * will race to add swap count continuation: we need to avoid
+ * over-provisioning.
+ */
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (!page) {
+ spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We are fortunate that although vmalloc_to_page uses pte_offset_map,
+ * no architecture is using highmem pages for kernel pagetables: so it
+ * will not corrupt the GFP_ATOMIC caller's atomic pagetable kmaps.
+ */
+ head = vmalloc_to_page(si->swap_map + offset);
+ offset &= ~PAGE_MASK;
+
+ /*
+ * Page allocation does not initialize the page's lru field,
+ * but it does always reset its private field.
+ */
+ if (!page_private(head)) {
+ BUG_ON(count & COUNT_CONTINUED);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&head->lru);
+ set_page_private(head, SWP_CONTINUED);
+ si->flags |= SWP_CONTINUED;
+ }
+
+ list_for_each_entry(list_page, &head->lru, lru) {
+ unsigned char *map;
+
+ /*
+ * If the previous map said no continuation, but we've found
+ * a continuation page, free our allocation and use this one.
+ */
+ if (!(count & COUNT_CONTINUED))
+ goto out;
+
+ map = kmap_atomic(list_page, KM_USER0) + offset;
+ count = *map;
+ kunmap_atomic(map, KM_USER0);
+
+ /*
+ * If this continuation count now has some space in it,
+ * free our allocation and use this one.
+ */
+ if ((count & ~COUNT_CONTINUED) != SWAP_CONT_MAX)
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ list_add_tail(&page->lru, &head->lru);
+ page = NULL; /* now it's attached, don't free it */
+out:
+ spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
+outer:
+ if (page)
+ __free_page(page);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * swap_count_continued - when the original swap_map count is incremented
+ * from SWAP_MAP_MAX, check if there is already a continuation page to carry
+ * into, carry if so, or else fail until a new continuation page is allocated;
+ * when the original swap_map count is decremented from 0 with continuation,
+ * borrow from the continuation and report whether it still holds more.
+ * Called while __swap_duplicate() or swap_entry_free() holds swap_lock.
+ */
+static bool swap_count_continued(struct swap_info_struct *si,
+ pgoff_t offset, unsigned char count)
+{
+ struct page *head;
+ struct page *page;
+ unsigned char *map;
+
+ head = vmalloc_to_page(si->swap_map + offset);
+ if (page_private(head) != SWP_CONTINUED) {
+ BUG_ON(count & COUNT_CONTINUED);
+ return false; /* need to add count continuation */
+ }
+
+ offset &= ~PAGE_MASK;
+ page = list_entry(head->lru.next, struct page, lru);
+ map = kmap_atomic(page, KM_USER0) + offset;
+
+ if (count == SWAP_MAP_MAX) /* initial increment from swap_map */
+ goto init_map; /* jump over SWAP_CONT_MAX checks */
+
+ if (count == (SWAP_MAP_MAX | COUNT_CONTINUED)) { /* incrementing */
+ /*
+ * Think of how you add 1 to 999
+ */
+ while (*map == (SWAP_CONT_MAX | COUNT_CONTINUED)) {
+ kunmap_atomic(map, KM_USER0);
+ page = list_entry(page->lru.next, struct page, lru);
+ BUG_ON(page == head);
+ map = kmap_atomic(page, KM_USER0) + offset;
+ }
+ if (*map == SWAP_CONT_MAX) {
+ kunmap_atomic(map, KM_USER0);
+ page = list_entry(page->lru.next, struct page, lru);
+ if (page == head)
+ return false; /* add count continuation */
+ map = kmap_atomic(page, KM_USER0) + offset;
+init_map: *map = 0; /* we didn't zero the page */
+ }
+ *map += 1;
+ kunmap_atomic(map, KM_USER0);
+ page = list_entry(page->lru.prev, struct page, lru);
+ while (page != head) {
+ map = kmap_atomic(page, KM_USER0) + offset;
+ *map = COUNT_CONTINUED;
+ kunmap_atomic(map, KM_USER0);
+ page = list_entry(page->lru.prev, struct page, lru);
+ }
+ return true; /* incremented */
+
+ } else { /* decrementing */
+ /*
+ * Think of how you subtract 1 from 1000
+ */
+ BUG_ON(count != COUNT_CONTINUED);
+ while (*map == COUNT_CONTINUED) {
+ kunmap_atomic(map, KM_USER0);
+ page = list_entry(page->lru.next, struct page, lru);
+ BUG_ON(page == head);
+ map = kmap_atomic(page, KM_USER0) + offset;
+ }
+ BUG_ON(*map == 0);
+ *map -= 1;
+ if (*map == 0)
+ count = 0;
+ kunmap_atomic(map, KM_USER0);
+ page = list_entry(page->lru.prev, struct page, lru);
+ while (page != head) {
+ map = kmap_atomic(page, KM_USER0) + offset;
+ *map = SWAP_CONT_MAX | count;
+ count = COUNT_CONTINUED;
+ kunmap_atomic(map, KM_USER0);
+ page = list_entry(page->lru.prev, struct page, lru);
+ }
+ return count == COUNT_CONTINUED;
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * free_swap_count_continuations - swapoff free all the continuation pages
+ * appended to the swap_map, after swap_map is quiesced, before vfree'ing it.
+ */
+static void free_swap_count_continuations(struct swap_info_struct *si)
+{
+ pgoff_t offset;
+
+ for (offset = 0; offset < si->max; offset += PAGE_SIZE) {
+ struct page *head;
+ head = vmalloc_to_page(si->swap_map + offset);
+ if (page_private(head)) {
+ struct list_head *this, *next;
+ list_for_each_safe(this, next, &head->lru) {
+ struct page *page;
+ page = list_entry(this, struct page, lru);
+ list_del(this);
+ __free_page(page);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
