memcg: fix up drain_local_stock comment
Thomas and Vlastimil have noticed that the comment in drain_local_stock
doesn't quite make sense. It talks about a synchronization with the
memory hotplug but there is no actual memory hotplug involvement here. I
meant to talk about cpu hotplug here. Fix that up and hopefuly make the
comment more helpful by referencing the cpu hotplug callback as well.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YRDwOhVglJmY7ES5@dhcp22.suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 894a24d..81fa831 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2178,8 +2178,9 @@ static void drain_local_stock(struct work_struct *dummy)
unsigned long flags;
/*
- * The only protection from memory hotplug vs. drain_stock races is
- * that we always operate on local CPU stock here with IRQ disabled
+ * The only protection from cpu hotplug (memcg_hotplug_cpu_dead) vs.
+ * drain_stock races is that we always operate on local CPU stock
+ * here with IRQ disabled
*/
local_irq_save(flags);
