[TCP]: Update references in two old comments
This updates references to drafts in comments which must be about 10
years old. Internet draft draft-ietf-tcpimpl-prob-03.txt expired in 1998
and was replaced by RFC 2525 in March 1999.
Section 3.10 of the draft maps almost identically into section 2.17 of RFC
2525: both are entitled "Failure to RST on close with data pending", the
differences in text body amount to a typo and minor sentence change.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 2cf9a89..d6e4886 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -1573,14 +1573,12 @@
sk_stream_mem_reclaim(sk);
- /* As outlined in draft-ietf-tcpimpl-prob-03.txt, section
- * 3.10, we send a RST here because data was lost. To
- * witness the awful effects of the old behavior of always
- * doing a FIN, run an older 2.1.x kernel or 2.0.x, start
- * a bulk GET in an FTP client, suspend the process, wait
- * for the client to advertise a zero window, then kill -9
- * the FTP client, wheee... Note: timeout is always zero
- * in such a case.
+ /* As outlined in RFC 2525, section 2.17, we send a RST here because
+ * data was lost. To witness the awful effects of the old behavior of
+ * always doing a FIN, run an older 2.1.x kernel or 2.0.x, start a bulk
+ * GET in an FTP client, suspend the process, wait for the client to
+ * advertise a zero window, then kill -9 the FTP client, wheee...
+ * Note: timeout is always zero in such a case.
*/
if (data_was_unread) {
/* Unread data was tossed, zap the connection. */
