net/ipv4/tcp.c: Fix use of PULLHUP instead of POLLHUP in comments.
Change PULLHUP to POLLHUP in tcp_poll comments and clean up another
comment for grammar and coding style.
Signed-off-by: Will Newton <will.newton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 56a133c..631133e 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -344,8 +344,8 @@
return inet_csk_listen_poll(sk);
/* Socket is not locked. We are protected from async events
- by poll logic and correct handling of state changes
- made by another threads is impossible in any case.
+ * by poll logic and correct handling of state changes
+ * made by other threads is impossible in any case.
*/
mask = 0;
@@ -371,10 +371,10 @@
* in state CLOSE_WAIT. One solution is evident --- to set POLLHUP
* if and only if shutdown has been made in both directions.
* Actually, it is interesting to look how Solaris and DUX
- * solve this dilemma. I would prefer, if PULLHUP were maskable,
+ * solve this dilemma. I would prefer, if POLLHUP were maskable,
* then we could set it on SND_SHUTDOWN. BTW examples given
* in Stevens' books assume exactly this behaviour, it explains
- * why PULLHUP is incompatible with POLLOUT. --ANK
+ * why POLLHUP is incompatible with POLLOUT. --ANK
*
* NOTE. Check for TCP_CLOSE is added. The goal is to prevent
* blocking on fresh not-connected or disconnected socket. --ANK
