pwm: Ensure pwm_apply_state() doesn't modify the state argument
It is surprising for a PWM consumer when the variable holding the
requested state is modified by pwm_apply_state(). Consider for example a
driver doing:
#define PERIOD 5000000
#define DUTY_LITTLE 10
...
struct pwm_state state = {
.period = PERIOD,
.duty_cycle = DUTY_LITTLE,
.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL,
.enabled = true,
};
pwm_apply_state(mypwm, &state);
...
state.duty_cycle = PERIOD / 2;
pwm_apply_state(mypwm, &state);
For sure the second call to pwm_apply_state() should still have
state.period = PERIOD and not something the hardware driver chose for a
reason that doesn't necessarily apply to the second call.
So declare the state argument as a pointer to a const type and adapt all
drivers' .apply callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
index 98f6ac6c..db5faa7 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static int cros_ec_pwm_get_duty(struct cros_ec_device *ec, u8 index)
}
static int cros_ec_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
- struct pwm_state *state)
+ const struct pwm_state *state)
{
struct cros_ec_pwm_device *ec_pwm = pwm_to_cros_ec_pwm(chip);
int duty_cycle;
