x86: Use memblock to replace early_res
1. replace find_e820_area with memblock_find_in_range
2. replace reserve_early with memblock_x86_reserve_range
3. replace free_early with memblock_x86_free_range.
4. NO_BOOTMEM will switch to use memblock too.
5. use _e820, _early wrap in the patch, in following patch, will
replace them all
6. because memblock_x86_free_range support partial free, we can remove some special care
7. Need to make sure that memblock_find_in_range() is called after memblock_x86_fill()
so adjust some calling later in setup.c::setup_arch()
-- corruption_check and mptable_update
-v2: Move reserve_brk() early
Before fill_memblock_area, to avoid overlap between brk and memblock_find_in_range()
that could happen We have more then 128 RAM entry in E820 tables, and
memblock_x86_fill() could use memblock_find_in_range() to find a new place for
memblock.memory.region array.
and We don't need to use extend_brk() after fill_memblock_area()
So move reserve_brk() early before fill_memblock_area().
-v3: Move find_smp_config early
To make sure memblock_find_in_range not find wrong place, if BIOS doesn't put mptable
in right place.
-v4: Treat RESERVED_KERN as RAM in memblock.memory. and they are already in
memblock.reserved already..
use __NOT_KEEP_MEMBLOCK to make sure memblock related code could be freed later.
-v5: Generic version __memblock_find_in_range() is going from high to low, and for 32bit
active_region for 32bit does include high pages
need to replace the limit with memblock.default_alloc_limit, aka get_max_mapped()
-v6: Use current_limit instead
-v7: check with MEMBLOCK_ERROR instead of -1ULL or -1L
-v8: Set memblock_can_resize early to handle EFI with more RAM entries
-v9: update after kmemleak changes in mainline
Suggested-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Suggested-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/check.c b/arch/x86/kernel/check.c
index fc999e6..13a3891 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/check.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/check.c
@@ -2,7 +2,8 @@
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
-#include <asm/e820.h>
+#include <linux/memblock.h>
+
#include <asm/proto.h>
/*
@@ -18,10 +19,12 @@
static unsigned __read_mostly corruption_check_size = 64*1024;
static unsigned __read_mostly corruption_check_period = 60; /* seconds */
-static struct e820entry scan_areas[MAX_SCAN_AREAS];
+static struct scan_area {
+ u64 addr;
+ u64 size;
+} scan_areas[MAX_SCAN_AREAS];
static int num_scan_areas;
-
static __init int set_corruption_check(char *arg)
{
char *end;
@@ -81,9 +84,9 @@
while (addr < corruption_check_size && num_scan_areas < MAX_SCAN_AREAS) {
u64 size;
- addr = find_e820_area_size(addr, &size, PAGE_SIZE);
+ addr = memblock_x86_find_in_range_size(addr, &size, PAGE_SIZE);
- if (!(addr + 1))
+ if (addr == MEMBLOCK_ERROR)
break;
if (addr >= corruption_check_size)
@@ -92,7 +95,7 @@
if ((addr + size) > corruption_check_size)
size = corruption_check_size - addr;
- e820_update_range(addr, size, E820_RAM, E820_RESERVED);
+ memblock_x86_reserve_range(addr, addr + size, "SCAN RAM");
scan_areas[num_scan_areas].addr = addr;
scan_areas[num_scan_areas].size = size;
num_scan_areas++;
@@ -105,7 +108,6 @@
printk(KERN_INFO "Scanning %d areas for low memory corruption\n",
num_scan_areas);
- update_e820();
}
