)]}'
{
  "commit": "8c0c07a3fcf824d39aed92f5e4e18ef9643dceff",
  "tree": "70ba765b4370e8f37a8b7859f054ec4e18727074",
  "parents": [
    "0023a061d75a37f50fb6952015b826d86de8d2c4",
    "afbac6010aec514998214fb19a1f37732b7a1d77"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "David S. Miller",
    "email": "davem@davemloft.net",
    "time": "Fri Jun 17 21:25:29 2016 -0700"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "David S. Miller",
    "email": "davem@davemloft.net",
    "time": "Fri Jun 17 21:25:29 2016 -0700"
  },
  "message": "Merge branch \u0027vrf-next\u0027\n\nDavid Ahern says:\n\n\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\nnet: vrf: Fix ipv6 source address selection\n\nIPv6 address selection is currently messed up for several use cases such\nas unnumbered deployments with global addresses on the VRF device and none\non the enslaved devices.\n\nUpdate the source address selection to consider the real output route as\nopposed to the VRF route that sends packets to the VRF device first (ie.,\nimplement get_saddr6 similar to the IPv4 method) and update the IPv6\naddress selection to consider L3 domains and preference for addresses on\nthe VRF device).\n\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\n\nSigned-off-by: David S. Miller \u003cdavem@davemloft.net\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": []
}