x86-64, NUMA: Introduce struct numa_meminfo
Arrays for memblks and nodeids and their length lived in separate
variables making things unnecessarily cumbersome. Introduce struct
numa_meminfo which contains all memory configuration info. This patch
doesn't cause any behavior change.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index 243d18d..c3496e2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -22,6 +22,17 @@
#include <asm/acpi.h>
#include <asm/amd_nb.h>
+struct numa_memblk {
+ u64 start;
+ u64 end;
+ int nid;
+};
+
+struct numa_meminfo {
+ int nr_blks;
+ struct numa_memblk blk[NR_NODE_MEMBLKS];
+};
+
struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_data);
@@ -33,9 +44,7 @@
static unsigned long __initdata nodemap_addr;
static unsigned long __initdata nodemap_size;
-static int num_node_memblks __initdata;
-static struct bootnode node_memblk_range[NR_NODE_MEMBLKS] __initdata;
-static int memblk_nodeid[NR_NODE_MEMBLKS] __initdata;
+static struct numa_meminfo numa_meminfo __initdata;
struct bootnode numa_nodes[MAX_NUMNODES] __initdata;
@@ -46,16 +55,15 @@
* 0 if memnodmap[] too small (of shift too small)
* -1 if node overlap or lost ram (shift too big)
*/
-static int __init populate_memnodemap(const struct bootnode *nodes,
- int numnodes, int shift, int *nodeids)
+static int __init populate_memnodemap(const struct numa_meminfo *mi, int shift)
{
unsigned long addr, end;
int i, res = -1;
memset(memnodemap, 0xff, sizeof(s16)*memnodemapsize);
- for (i = 0; i < numnodes; i++) {
- addr = nodes[i].start;
- end = nodes[i].end;
+ for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
+ addr = mi->blk[i].start;
+ end = mi->blk[i].end;
if (addr >= end)
continue;
if ((end >> shift) >= memnodemapsize)
@@ -63,7 +71,7 @@
do {
if (memnodemap[addr >> shift] != NUMA_NO_NODE)
return -1;
- memnodemap[addr >> shift] = nodeids[i];
+ memnodemap[addr >> shift] = mi->blk[i].nid;
addr += (1UL << shift);
} while (addr < end);
res = 1;
@@ -101,16 +109,15 @@
* The LSB of all start and end addresses in the node map is the value of the
* maximum possible shift.
*/
-static int __init extract_lsb_from_nodes(const struct bootnode *nodes,
- int numnodes)
+static int __init extract_lsb_from_nodes(const struct numa_meminfo *mi)
{
int i, nodes_used = 0;
unsigned long start, end;
unsigned long bitfield = 0, memtop = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < numnodes; i++) {
- start = nodes[i].start;
- end = nodes[i].end;
+ for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
+ start = mi->blk[i].start;
+ end = mi->blk[i].end;
if (start >= end)
continue;
bitfield |= start;
@@ -126,18 +133,17 @@
return i;
}
-static int __init compute_hash_shift(struct bootnode *nodes, int numnodes,
- int *nodeids)
+static int __init compute_hash_shift(const struct numa_meminfo *mi)
{
int shift;
- shift = extract_lsb_from_nodes(nodes, numnodes);
+ shift = extract_lsb_from_nodes(mi);
if (allocate_cachealigned_memnodemap())
return -1;
printk(KERN_DEBUG "NUMA: Using %d for the hash shift.\n",
shift);
- if (populate_memnodemap(nodes, numnodes, shift, nodeids) != 1) {
+ if (populate_memnodemap(mi, shift) != 1) {
printk(KERN_INFO "Your memory is not aligned you need to "
"rebuild your kernel with a bigger NODEMAPSIZE "
"shift=%d\n", shift);
@@ -185,21 +191,25 @@
static __init int conflicting_memblks(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
+ struct numa_meminfo *mi = &numa_meminfo;
int i;
- for (i = 0; i < num_node_memblks; i++) {
- struct bootnode *nd = &node_memblk_range[i];
- if (nd->start == nd->end)
+
+ for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
+ struct numa_memblk *blk = &mi->blk[i];
+
+ if (blk->start == blk->end)
continue;
- if (nd->end > start && nd->start < end)
- return memblk_nodeid[i];
- if (nd->end == end && nd->start == start)
- return memblk_nodeid[i];
+ if (blk->end > start && blk->start < end)
+ return blk->nid;
+ if (blk->end == end && blk->start == start)
+ return blk->nid;
}
return -1;
}
int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
{
+ struct numa_meminfo *mi = &numa_meminfo;
int i;
i = conflicting_memblks(start, end);
@@ -213,10 +223,10 @@
return -EINVAL;
}
- node_memblk_range[num_node_memblks].start = start;
- node_memblk_range[num_node_memblks].end = end;
- memblk_nodeid[num_node_memblks] = nid;
- num_node_memblks++;
+ mi->blk[mi->nr_blks].start = start;
+ mi->blk[mi->nr_blks].end = end;
+ mi->blk[mi->nr_blks].nid = nid;
+ mi->nr_blks++;
return 0;
}
@@ -315,66 +325,59 @@
static int __init numa_register_memblks(void)
{
+ struct numa_meminfo *mi = &numa_meminfo;
int i;
/*
* Join together blocks on the same node, holes between
* which don't overlap with memory on other nodes.
*/
- for (i = 0; i < num_node_memblks; ++i) {
+ for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; ++i) {
+ struct numa_memblk *bi = &mi->blk[i];
int j, k;
- for (j = i + 1; j < num_node_memblks; ++j) {
+ for (j = i + 1; j < mi->nr_blks; ++j) {
+ struct numa_memblk *bj = &mi->blk[j];
unsigned long start, end;
- if (memblk_nodeid[i] != memblk_nodeid[j])
+ if (bi->nid != bj->nid)
continue;
- start = min(node_memblk_range[i].end,
- node_memblk_range[j].end);
- end = max(node_memblk_range[i].start,
- node_memblk_range[j].start);
- for (k = 0; k < num_node_memblks; ++k) {
- if (memblk_nodeid[i] == memblk_nodeid[k])
+ start = min(bi->end, bj->end);
+ end = max(bi->start, bj->start);
+ for (k = 0; k < mi->nr_blks; ++k) {
+ struct numa_memblk *bk = &mi->blk[k];
+
+ if (bi->nid == bk->nid)
continue;
- if (start < node_memblk_range[k].end &&
- end > node_memblk_range[k].start)
+ if (start < bk->end && end > bk->start)
break;
}
- if (k < num_node_memblks)
+ if (k < mi->nr_blks)
continue;
- start = min(node_memblk_range[i].start,
- node_memblk_range[j].start);
- end = max(node_memblk_range[i].end,
- node_memblk_range[j].end);
+ start = min(bi->start, bj->start);
+ end = max(bi->end, bj->end);
printk(KERN_INFO "NUMA: Node %d [%Lx,%Lx) + [%Lx,%Lx) -> [%lx,%lx)\n",
- memblk_nodeid[i],
- node_memblk_range[i].start,
- node_memblk_range[i].end,
- node_memblk_range[j].start,
- node_memblk_range[j].end,
+ bi->nid, bi->start, bi->end, bj->start, bj->end,
start, end);
- node_memblk_range[i].start = start;
- node_memblk_range[i].end = end;
- k = --num_node_memblks - j;
- memmove(memblk_nodeid + j, memblk_nodeid + j+1,
- k * sizeof(*memblk_nodeid));
- memmove(node_memblk_range + j, node_memblk_range + j+1,
- k * sizeof(*node_memblk_range));
+ bi->start = start;
+ bi->end = end;
+ k = --mi->nr_blks - j;
+ memmove(mi->blk + j, mi->blk + j + 1,
+ k * sizeof(mi->blk[0]));
--j;
}
}
- memnode_shift = compute_hash_shift(node_memblk_range, num_node_memblks,
- memblk_nodeid);
+ memnode_shift = compute_hash_shift(mi);
if (memnode_shift < 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "NUMA: No NUMA node hash function found. Contact maintainer\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- for (i = 0; i < num_node_memblks; i++)
- memblock_x86_register_active_regions(memblk_nodeid[i],
- node_memblk_range[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
- node_memblk_range[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+ for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++)
+ memblock_x86_register_active_regions(mi->blk[i].nid,
+ mi->blk[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
+ mi->blk[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
/* for out of order entries */
sort_node_map();
@@ -701,7 +704,7 @@
static int __init numa_emulation(unsigned long start_pfn,
unsigned long last_pfn, int acpi, int amd)
{
- static int nodeid[NR_NODE_MEMBLKS] __initdata;
+ static struct numa_meminfo ei __initdata;
u64 addr = start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
u64 max_addr = last_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
int num_nodes;
@@ -727,10 +730,14 @@
if (num_nodes < 0)
return num_nodes;
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(nodeid); i++)
- nodeid[i] = i;
+ ei.nr_blks = num_nodes;
+ for (i = 0; i < ei.nr_blks; i++) {
+ ei.blk[i].start = nodes[i].start;
+ ei.blk[i].end = nodes[i].end;
+ ei.blk[i].nid = i;
+ }
- memnode_shift = compute_hash_shift(nodes, num_nodes, nodeid);
+ memnode_shift = compute_hash_shift(&ei);
if (memnode_shift < 0) {
memnode_shift = 0;
printk(KERN_ERR "No NUMA hash function found. NUMA emulation "
@@ -797,9 +804,7 @@
nodes_clear(mem_nodes_parsed);
nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
nodes_clear(node_online_map);
- num_node_memblks = 0;
- memset(node_memblk_range, 0, sizeof(node_memblk_range));
- memset(memblk_nodeid, 0, sizeof(memblk_nodeid));
+ memset(&numa_meminfo, 0, sizeof(numa_meminfo));
memset(numa_nodes, 0, sizeof(numa_nodes));
remove_all_active_ranges();
