perf tools: Add kernel AUX area sampling definitions
Add kernel AUX area sampling definitions, which brings perf_event.h into
line with the kernel version.
New sample type PERF_SAMPLE_AUX requests a sample of the AUX area
buffer. New perf_event_attr member 'aux_sample_size' specifies the
desired size of the sample.
Also add support for parsing samples containing AUX area data i.e.
PERF_SAMPLE_AUX.
Committer notes:
I squashed the first two patches in this series to avoid breaking
automatic bisection, i.e. after applying only the original first patch
in this series we would have:
# perf test -v parsing
26: Sample parsing :
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 17018
sample format has changed, some new PERF_SAMPLE_ bit was introduced - test needs updating
test child finished with -1
---- end ----
Sample parsing: FAILED!
#
With the two paches combined:
# perf test parsing
26: Sample parsing : Ok
#
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191115124225.5247-3-adrian.hunter@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
index 3a02426..2762e11 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
@@ -150,6 +150,15 @@ static bool samples_same(const struct perf_sample *s1,
if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR)
COMP(phys_addr);
+ if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_AUX) {
+ COMP(aux_sample.size);
+ if (memcmp(s1->aux_sample.data, s2->aux_sample.data,
+ s1->aux_sample.size)) {
+ pr_debug("Samples differ at 'aux_sample'\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+
return true;
}
@@ -182,6 +191,7 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type, u64 sample_regs, u64 read_format)
u64 regs[64];
const u64 raw_data[] = {0x123456780a0b0c0dULL, 0x1102030405060708ULL};
const u64 data[] = {0x2211443366558877ULL, 0, 0xaabbccddeeff4321ULL};
+ const u64 aux_data[] = {0xa55a, 0, 0xeeddee, 0x0282028202820282};
struct perf_sample sample = {
.ip = 101,
.pid = 102,
@@ -218,6 +228,10 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type, u64 sample_regs, u64 read_format)
.regs = regs,
},
.phys_addr = 113,
+ .aux_sample = {
+ .size = sizeof(aux_data),
+ .data = (void *)aux_data,
+ },
};
struct sample_read_value values[] = {{1, 5}, {9, 3}, {2, 7}, {6, 4},};
struct perf_sample sample_out;
@@ -317,7 +331,7 @@ int test__sample_parsing(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
* were added. Please actually update the test rather than just change
* the condition below.
*/
- if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR << 1) {
+ if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_AUX << 1) {
pr_debug("sample format has changed, some new PERF_SAMPLE_ bit was introduced - test needs updating\n");
return -1;
}
