tree af896c176c43d334691e5853104fe7bc126c4842
parent fe82dcec644244676d55a1384c958d5f67979adb
author David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> 1412085028 +0100
committer David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> 1412085028 +0100

CacheFiles: Handle object being killed before being set up

If a cache object gets killed whilst in the process of being set up - for
instance if the netfs relinquishes the cookie that the object is associated
with - then the object's state machine will transit to the DROP_OBJECT state
without necessarily going through the LOOKUP_OBJECT or CREATE_OBJECT states.

This is a problem for CacheFiles because cachefiles_drop_object() assumes that
object->dentry will be set upon reaching the DROP_OBJECT state and has an
ASSERT() to that effect (see the oops below) - but object->dentry doesn't get
set until the LOOKUP_OBJECT or CREATE_OBJECT states (and not always then if
they fail).

To fix this, just make the dentry cleanup in cachefiles_drop_object()
conditional on the dentry actually being set and remove the assertion.

	CacheFiles: Assertion failed
	------------[ cut here ]------------
	kernel BUG at .../fs/cachefiles/namei.c:425!
	...
	Workqueue: fscache_object fscache_object_work_func [fscache]
	...
	RIP: ... cachefiles_delete_object+0xcd/0x110 [cachefiles]
	...
	Call Trace:
	 [<ffffffffa043280f>] ? cachefiles_drop_object+0xff/0x130 [cachefiles]
	 [<ffffffffa02ac511>] ? fscache_drop_object+0xd1/0x1d0 [fscache]
	 [<ffffffffa02ac697>] ? fscache_object_work_func+0x87/0x210 [fscache]
	 [<ffffffff81080635>] ? process_one_work+0x155/0x450
	 [<ffffffff81081c44>] ? worker_thread+0x114/0x370
	 [<ffffffff81081b30>] ? manage_workers.isra.21+0x2c0/0x2c0
	 [<ffffffff81087fcc>] ? kthread+0xbc/0xe0
	 [<ffffffff81087f10>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xa0/0xa0
	 [<ffffffff8150638c>] ? ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
	 [<ffffffff81087f10>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xa0/0xa0

Reported-by: Manuel Schölling <manuel.schoelling@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>