erofs: use erofs_inode naming
As Christoph suggested [1], "Why is this called vnode instead
of inode? That seems like a rather odd naming for a Linux
file system."
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829101545.GC20598@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-10-gaoxiang25@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
diff --git a/fs/erofs/zdata.c b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
index 653bde0..f06a2fa 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/zdata.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static struct z_erofs_collection *clregister(struct z_erofs_collector *clt,
else
pcl->algorithmformat = Z_EROFS_COMPRESSION_SHIFTED;
- pcl->clusterbits = EROFS_V(inode)->z_physical_clusterbits[0];
+ pcl->clusterbits = EROFS_I(inode)->z_physical_clusterbits[0];
pcl->clusterbits -= PAGE_SHIFT;
/* new pclusters should be claimed as type 1, primary and followed */
@@ -1404,12 +1404,9 @@ static int z_erofs_vle_normalaccess_readpages(struct file *filp,
head = (void *)page_private(page);
err = z_erofs_do_read_page(&f, page, &pagepool);
- if (err) {
- struct erofs_vnode *vi = EROFS_V(inode);
-
+ if (err)
errln("%s, readahead error at page %lu of nid %llu",
- __func__, page->index, vi->nid);
- }
+ __func__, page->index, EROFS_I(inode)->nid);
put_page(page);
}
