clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t
There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.
Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:
@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;
@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
index 5d0bb02..ddec53b 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ static void wakeup_print_header(struct seq_file *s)
/*
* Should this new latency be reported/recorded?
*/
-static bool report_latency(struct trace_array *tr, cycle_t delta)
+static bool report_latency(struct trace_array *tr, u64 delta)
{
if (tracing_thresh) {
if (delta < tracing_thresh)
@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ probe_wakeup_sched_switch(void *ignore, bool preempt,
struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next)
{
struct trace_array_cpu *data;
- cycle_t T0, T1, delta;
+ u64 T0, T1, delta;
unsigned long flags;
long disabled;
int cpu;
