| ===================================================== |
| Memory Resource Controller(Memcg) Implementation Memo |
| ===================================================== |
| |
| Last Updated: 2010/2 |
| |
| Base Kernel Version: based on 2.6.33-rc7-mm(candidate for 34). |
| |
| Because VM is getting complex (one of reasons is memcg...), memcg's behavior |
| is complex. This is a document for memcg's internal behavior. |
| Please note that implementation details can be changed. |
| |
| (*) Topics on API should be in Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst) |
| |
| 0. How to record usage ? |
| ======================== |
| |
| 2 objects are used. |
| |
| page_cgroup ....an object per page. |
| |
| Allocated at boot or memory hotplug. Freed at memory hot removal. |
| |
| swap_cgroup ... an entry per swp_entry. |
| |
| Allocated at swapon(). Freed at swapoff(). |
| |
| The page_cgroup has USED bit and double count against a page_cgroup never |
| occurs. swap_cgroup is used only when a charged page is swapped-out. |
| |
| 1. Charge |
| ========= |
| |
| a page/swp_entry may be charged (usage += PAGE_SIZE) at |
| |
| mem_cgroup_try_charge() |
| |
| 2. Uncharge |
| =========== |
| |
| a page/swp_entry may be uncharged (usage -= PAGE_SIZE) by |
| |
| mem_cgroup_uncharge() |
| Called when a page's refcount goes down to 0. |
| |
| mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap() |
| Called when swp_entry's refcnt goes down to 0. A charge against swap |
| disappears. |
| |
| 3. charge-commit-cancel |
| ======================= |
| |
| Memcg pages are charged in two steps: |
| |
| - mem_cgroup_try_charge() |
| - mem_cgroup_commit_charge() or mem_cgroup_cancel_charge() |
| |
| At try_charge(), there are no flags to say "this page is charged". |
| at this point, usage += PAGE_SIZE. |
| |
| At commit(), the page is associated with the memcg. |
| |
| At cancel(), simply usage -= PAGE_SIZE. |
| |
| Under below explanation, we assume CONFIG_SWAP=y. |
| |
| 4. Anonymous |
| ============ |
| |
| Anonymous page is newly allocated at |
| - page fault into MAP_ANONYMOUS mapping. |
| - Copy-On-Write. |
| |
| 4.1 Swap-in. |
| At swap-in, the page is taken from swap-cache. There are 2 cases. |
| |
| (a) If the SwapCache is newly allocated and read, it has no charges. |
| (b) If the SwapCache has been mapped by processes, it has been |
| charged already. |
| |
| 4.2 Swap-out. |
| At swap-out, typical state transition is below. |
| |
| (a) add to swap cache. (marked as SwapCache) |
| swp_entry's refcnt += 1. |
| (b) fully unmapped. |
| swp_entry's refcnt += # of ptes. |
| (c) write back to swap. |
| (d) delete from swap cache. (remove from SwapCache) |
| swp_entry's refcnt -= 1. |
| |
| |
| Finally, at task exit, |
| (e) zap_pte() is called and swp_entry's refcnt -=1 -> 0. |
| |
| 5. Page Cache |
| ============= |
| |
| Page Cache is charged at |
| - filemap_add_folio(). |
| |
| The logic is very clear. (About migration, see below) |
| |
| Note: |
| __filemap_remove_folio() is called by filemap_remove_folio() |
| and __remove_mapping(). |
| |
| 6. Shmem(tmpfs) Page Cache |
| =========================== |
| |
| The best way to understand shmem's page state transition is to read |
| mm/shmem.c. |
| |
| But brief explanation of the behavior of memcg around shmem will be |
| helpful to understand the logic. |
| |
| Shmem's page (just leaf page, not direct/indirect block) can be on |
| |
| - radix-tree of shmem's inode. |
| - SwapCache. |
| - Both on radix-tree and SwapCache. This happens at swap-in |
| and swap-out, |
| |
| It's charged when... |
| |
| - A new page is added to shmem's radix-tree. |
| - A swp page is read. (move a charge from swap_cgroup to page_cgroup) |
| |
| 7. Page Migration |
| ================= |
| |
| mem_cgroup_migrate() |
| |
| 8. LRU |
| ====== |
| Each memcg has its own vector of LRUs (inactive anon, active anon, |
| inactive file, active file, unevictable) of pages from each node, |
| each LRU handled under a single lru_lock for that memcg and node. |
| |
| 9. Typical Tests. |
| ================= |
| |
| Tests for racy cases. |
| |
| 9.1 Small limit to memcg. |
| ------------------------- |
| |
| When you do test to do racy case, it's good test to set memcg's limit |
| to be very small rather than GB. Many races found in the test under |
| xKB or xxMB limits. |
| |
| (Memory behavior under GB and Memory behavior under MB shows very |
| different situation.) |
| |
| 9.2 Shmem |
| --------- |
| |
| Historically, memcg's shmem handling was poor and we saw some amount |
| of troubles here. This is because shmem is page-cache but can be |
| SwapCache. Test with shmem/tmpfs is always good test. |
| |
| 9.3 Migration |
| ------------- |
| |
| For NUMA, migration is an another special case. To do easy test, cpuset |
| is useful. Following is a sample script to do migration:: |
| |
| mount -t cgroup -o cpuset none /opt/cpuset |
| |
| mkdir /opt/cpuset/01 |
| echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/01/cpuset.cpus |
| echo 0 > /opt/cpuset/01/cpuset.mems |
| echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/01/cpuset.memory_migrate |
| mkdir /opt/cpuset/02 |
| echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/02/cpuset.cpus |
| echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/02/cpuset.mems |
| echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/02/cpuset.memory_migrate |
| |
| In above set, when you moves a task from 01 to 02, page migration to |
| node 0 to node 1 will occur. Following is a script to migrate all |
| under cpuset.:: |
| |
| -- |
| move_task() |
| { |
| for pid in $1 |
| do |
| /bin/echo $pid >$2/tasks 2>/dev/null |
| echo -n $pid |
| echo -n " " |
| done |
| echo END |
| } |
| |
| G1_TASK=`cat ${G1}/tasks` |
| G2_TASK=`cat ${G2}/tasks` |
| move_task "${G1_TASK}" ${G2} & |
| -- |
| |
| 9.4 Memory hotplug |
| ------------------ |
| |
| memory hotplug test is one of good test. |
| |
| to offline memory, do following:: |
| |
| # echo offline > /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXXX/state |
| |
| (XXX is the place of memory) |
| |
| This is an easy way to test page migration, too. |
| |
| 9.5 nested cgroups |
| ------------------ |
| |
| Use tests like the following for testing nested cgroups:: |
| |
| mkdir /opt/cgroup/01/child_a |
| mkdir /opt/cgroup/01/child_b |
| |
| set limit to 01. |
| add limit to 01/child_b |
| run jobs under child_a and child_b |
| |
| create/delete following groups at random while jobs are running:: |
| |
| /opt/cgroup/01/child_a/child_aa |
| /opt/cgroup/01/child_b/child_bb |
| /opt/cgroup/01/child_c |
| |
| running new jobs in new group is also good. |
| |
| 9.6 Mount with other subsystems |
| ------------------------------- |
| |
| Mounting with other subsystems is a good test because there is a |
| race and lock dependency with other cgroup subsystems. |
| |
| example:: |
| |
| # mount -t cgroup none /cgroup -o cpuset,memory,cpu,devices |
| |
| and do task move, mkdir, rmdir etc...under this. |
| |
| 9.7 swapoff |
| ----------- |
| |
| Besides management of swap is one of complicated parts of memcg, |
| call path of swap-in at swapoff is not same as usual swap-in path.. |
| It's worth to be tested explicitly. |
| |
| For example, test like following is good: |
| |
| (Shell-A):: |
| |
| # mount -t cgroup none /cgroup -o memory |
| # mkdir /cgroup/test |
| # echo 40M > /cgroup/test/memory.limit_in_bytes |
| # echo 0 > /cgroup/test/tasks |
| |
| Run malloc(100M) program under this. You'll see 60M of swaps. |
| |
| (Shell-B):: |
| |
| # move all tasks in /cgroup/test to /cgroup |
| # /sbin/swapoff -a |
| # rmdir /cgroup/test |
| # kill malloc task. |
| |
| Of course, tmpfs v.s. swapoff test should be tested, too. |
| |
| 9.8 OOM-Killer |
| -------------- |
| |
| Out-of-memory caused by memcg's limit will kill tasks under |
| the memcg. When hierarchy is used, a task under hierarchy |
| will be killed by the kernel. |
| |
| In this case, panic_on_oom shouldn't be invoked and tasks |
| in other groups shouldn't be killed. |
| |
| It's not difficult to cause OOM under memcg as following. |
| |
| Case A) when you can swapoff:: |
| |
| #swapoff -a |
| #echo 50M > /memory.limit_in_bytes |
| |
| run 51M of malloc |
| |
| Case B) when you use mem+swap limitation:: |
| |
| #echo 50M > memory.limit_in_bytes |
| #echo 50M > memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes |
| |
| run 51M of malloc |
| |
| 9.9 Move charges at task migration |
| ---------------------------------- |
| |
| Charges associated with a task can be moved along with task migration. |
| |
| (Shell-A):: |
| |
| #mkdir /cgroup/A |
| #echo $$ >/cgroup/A/tasks |
| |
| run some programs which uses some amount of memory in /cgroup/A. |
| |
| (Shell-B):: |
| |
| #mkdir /cgroup/B |
| #echo 1 >/cgroup/B/memory.move_charge_at_immigrate |
| #echo "pid of the program running in group A" >/cgroup/B/tasks |
| |
| You can see charges have been moved by reading ``*.usage_in_bytes`` or |
| memory.stat of both A and B. |
| |
| See 8.2 of Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst to see what value should |
| be written to move_charge_at_immigrate. |
| |
| 9.10 Memory thresholds |
| ---------------------- |
| |
| Memory controller implements memory thresholds using cgroups notification |
| API. You can use tools/cgroup/cgroup_event_listener.c to test it. |
| |
| (Shell-A) Create cgroup and run event listener:: |
| |
| # mkdir /cgroup/A |
| # ./cgroup_event_listener /cgroup/A/memory.usage_in_bytes 5M |
| |
| (Shell-B) Add task to cgroup and try to allocate and free memory:: |
| |
| # echo $$ >/cgroup/A/tasks |
| # a="$(dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=10)" |
| # a= |
| |
| You will see message from cgroup_event_listener every time you cross |
| the thresholds. |
| |
| Use /cgroup/A/memory.memsw.usage_in_bytes to test memsw thresholds. |
| |
| It's good idea to test root cgroup as well. |