drm/i915: Disallow preallocation of requests
The intention was to allow the caller to avoid a failure to queue a
request having already written commands to the ring. However, this is a
moot point as the i915_add_request() can fail for other reasons than a
mere allocation failure and those failure cases are more likely than
ENOMEM. So the overlay code already had to handle i915_add_request()
failures, and due to
commit 3bb73aba1ed5198a2c1dfaac4f3c95459930d84a
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Fri Jul 20 12:40:59 2012 +0100
drm/i915: Allow late allocation of request for i915_add_request()
the error handling code in intel_overlay.c was subject to causing
double-frees, as found by coverity.
Rather than further complicate i915_add_request() and callers, realise
the battle is lost and adapt intel_overlay.c to take advantage of the
late allocation of requests.
v2: Handle callers passing in a NULL seqno.
v3: Ditto. This time for sure.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 4f2831a..d5138c3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1427,7 +1427,7 @@
int __must_check i915_gem_idle(struct drm_device *dev);
int i915_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
struct drm_file *file,
- struct drm_i915_gem_request *request);
+ u32 *seqno);
int __must_check i915_wait_seqno(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
uint32_t seqno);
int i915_gem_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf);
