sched/balancing: Fix 'local->avg_load > sds->avg_load' case in calculate_imbalance()
In busiest->group_imb case we can come to calculate_imbalance() with
local->avg_load >= busiest->avg_load >= sds->avg_load. This can result
in imbalance overflow, because it is calculated as follows
env->imbalance = min(
max_pull * busiest->group_power,
(sds->avg_load - local->avg_load) * local->group_power) / SCHED_POWER_SCALE;
As a result we can end up constantly bouncing tasks from one cpu to
another if there are pinned tasks.
Fix this by skipping the assignment and assuming imbalance=0 in case
local->avg_load > sds->avg_load.
[ The bug can be caught by running 2*N cpuhogs pinned to two logical cpus
belonging to different cores on an HT-enabled machine with N logical
cpus: just look at se.nr_migrations growth. ]
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8f596cc6bc0e5e655119dc892c9bfcad26e971f4.1379252740.git.vdavydov@parallels.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 11cd136..0b99aae 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4896,7 +4896,8 @@
* max load less than avg load(as we skip the groups at or below
* its cpu_power, while calculating max_load..)
*/
- if (busiest->avg_load < sds->avg_load) {
+ if (busiest->avg_load <= sds->avg_load ||
+ local->avg_load >= sds->avg_load) {
env->imbalance = 0;
return fix_small_imbalance(env, sds);
}
