locking/osq: Fix ordering of node initialisation in osq_lock
The Cavium guys reported a soft lockup on their arm64 machine, caused by
commit c55a6ffa6285 ("locking/osq: Relax atomic semantics"):
mutex_optimistic_spin+0x9c/0x1d0
__mutex_lock_slowpath+0x44/0x158
mutex_lock+0x54/0x58
kernfs_iop_permission+0x38/0x70
__inode_permission+0x88/0xd8
inode_permission+0x30/0x6c
link_path_walk+0x68/0x4d4
path_openat+0xb4/0x2bc
do_filp_open+0x74/0xd0
do_sys_open+0x14c/0x228
SyS_openat+0x3c/0x48
el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28
This is because in osq_lock we initialise the node for the current CPU:
node->locked = 0;
node->next = NULL;
node->cpu = curr;
and then publish the current CPU in the lock tail:
old = atomic_xchg_acquire(&lock->tail, curr);
Once the update to lock->tail is visible to another CPU, the node is
then live and can be both read and updated by concurrent lockers.
Unfortunately, the ACQUIRE semantics of the xchg operation mean that
there is no guarantee the contents of the node will be visible before
lock tail is updated. This can lead to lock corruption when, for
example, a concurrent locker races to set the next field.
Fixes: c55a6ffa6285 ("locking/osq: Relax atomic semantics"):
Reported-by: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Reported-by: Andrew Pinski <andrew.pinski@caviumnetworks.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Pinski <andrew.pinski@caviumnetworks.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1449856001-21177-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
1 file changed
