tree 03f743474c481d9c9c5f931675dba0d79a546ba8
parent 92d585ef067da7a966d6ce78c601bd1562b62619
author Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> 1393965526 -0500
committer Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 1394345309 -0800

kernfs: cache atomic_write_len in kernfs_open_file

While implementing atomic_write_len, 4d3773c4bb41 ("kernfs: implement
kernfs_ops->atomic_write_len") moved data copy from userland inside
kernfs_get_active() and kernfs_open_file->mutex so that
kernfs_ops->atomic_write_len can be accessed before copying buffer
from userland; unfortunately, this could lead to locking order
inversion involving mmap_sem if copy_from_user() takes a page fault.

  ======================================================
  [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
  3.14.0-rc4-next-20140228-sasha-00011-g4077c67-dirty #26 Tainted: G        W
  -------------------------------------------------------
  trinity-c236/10658 is trying to acquire lock:
   (&of->mutex#2){+.+.+.}, at: [<fs/kernfs/file.c:487>] kernfs_fop_mmap+0x54/0x120

  but task is already holding lock:
   (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<mm/util.c:397>] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x6e/0xe0

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #1 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}:
	 [<kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1945 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2131>] validate_chain+0x6c5/0x7b0
	 [<kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3182>] __lock_acquire+0x4cd/0x5a0
	 [<arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:14 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3602>] lock_acquire+0x182/0x1d0
	 [<mm/memory.c:4188>] might_fault+0x7e/0xb0
	 [<arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:713 fs/kernfs/file.c:291>] kernfs_fop_write+0xd8/0x190
	 [<fs/read_write.c:473>] vfs_write+0xe3/0x1d0
	 [<fs/read_write.c:523 fs/read_write.c:515>] SyS_write+0x5d/0xa0
	 [<arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:749>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2

 -> #0 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.+.}:
	 [<kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1840>] check_prev_add+0x13f/0x560
	 [<kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1945 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2131>] validate_chain+0x6c5/0x7b0
	 [<kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3182>] __lock_acquire+0x4cd/0x5a0
	 [<arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:14 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3602>] lock_acquire+0x182/0x1d0
	 [<kernel/locking/mutex.c:470 kernel/locking/mutex.c:571>] mutex_lock_nested+0x6a/0x510
	 [<fs/kernfs/file.c:487>] kernfs_fop_mmap+0x54/0x120
	 [<mm/mmap.c:1573>] mmap_region+0x310/0x5c0
	 [<mm/mmap.c:1365>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x385/0x430
	 [<mm/util.c:399>] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x8f/0xe0
	 [<mm/mmap.c:1416 mm/mmap.c:1374>] SyS_mmap_pgoff+0x1b0/0x210
	 [<arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:72>] SyS_mmap+0x1d/0x20
	 [<arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:749>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2

  other info that might help us debug this:

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
				 lock(&of->mutex#2);
				 lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
    lock(&of->mutex#2);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  1 lock held by trinity-c236/10658:
   #0:  (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<mm/util.c:397>] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x6e/0xe0

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 2 PID: 10658 Comm: trinity-c236 Tainted: G        W 3.14.0-rc4-next-20140228-sasha-00011-g4077c67-dirty #26
   0000000000000000 ffff88011911fa48 ffffffff8438e945 0000000000000000
   0000000000000000 ffff88011911fa98 ffffffff811a0109 ffff88011911fab8
   ffff88011911fab8 ffff88011911fa98 ffff880119128cc0 ffff880119128cf8
  Call Trace:
   [<lib/dump_stack.c:52>] dump_stack+0x52/0x7f
   [<kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1213>] print_circular_bug+0x129/0x160
   [<kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1840>] check_prev_add+0x13f/0x560
   [<include/linux/spinlock.h:343 mm/slub.c:1933>] ? deactivate_slab+0x511/0x550
   [<kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1945 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2131>] validate_chain+0x6c5/0x7b0
   [<kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3182>] __lock_acquire+0x4cd/0x5a0
   [<mm/mmap.c:1552>] ? mmap_region+0x24a/0x5c0
   [<arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:14 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3602>] lock_acquire+0x182/0x1d0
   [<fs/kernfs/file.c:487>] ? kernfs_fop_mmap+0x54/0x120
   [<kernel/locking/mutex.c:470 kernel/locking/mutex.c:571>] mutex_lock_nested+0x6a/0x510
   [<fs/kernfs/file.c:487>] ? kernfs_fop_mmap+0x54/0x120
   [<kernel/sched/core.c:2477>] ? get_parent_ip+0x11/0x50
   [<fs/kernfs/file.c:487>] ? kernfs_fop_mmap+0x54/0x120
   [<fs/kernfs/file.c:487>] kernfs_fop_mmap+0x54/0x120
   [<mm/mmap.c:1573>] mmap_region+0x310/0x5c0
   [<mm/mmap.c:1365>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x385/0x430
   [<mm/util.c:397>] ? vm_mmap_pgoff+0x6e/0xe0
   [<mm/util.c:399>] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x8f/0xe0
   [<kernel/rcu/update.c:97>] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x44/0xb0
   [<fs/file.c:641>] ? dup_fd+0x3c0/0x3c0
   [<mm/mmap.c:1416 mm/mmap.c:1374>] SyS_mmap_pgoff+0x1b0/0x210
   [<arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:72>] SyS_mmap+0x1d/0x20
   [<arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:749>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2

Fix it by caching atomic_write_len in kernfs_open_file during open so
that it can be determined without accessing kernfs_ops in
kernfs_fop_write().  This restores the structure of kernfs_fop_write()
before 4d3773c4bb41 with updated @len determination logic.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
References: http://lkml.kernel.org/g/53113485.2090407@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>