convert btrfs to ->evict_inode()
NB: do we want btrfs_wait_ordered_range() on eviction of
inodes with positive i_nlink on subvolume with zero root_refs?
If not, btrfs_evict_inode() can be simplified by unconditionally
bailing out in case of i_nlink > 0 in the very beginning...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 95eac01..ce02199ec 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -3668,7 +3668,7 @@
return err;
}
-void btrfs_delete_inode(struct inode *inode)
+void btrfs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
{
struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
@@ -3676,10 +3676,14 @@
int ret;
truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0);
+ if (inode->i_nlink && btrfs_root_refs(&root->root_item) != 0)
+ goto no_delete;
+
if (is_bad_inode(inode)) {
btrfs_orphan_del(NULL, inode);
goto no_delete;
}
+ /* do we really want it for ->i_nlink > 0 and zero btrfs_root_refs? */
btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode, 0, (u64)-1);
if (root->fs_info->log_root_recovering) {
@@ -3729,7 +3733,7 @@
btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
btrfs_btree_balance_dirty(root, nr);
no_delete:
- clear_inode(inode);
+ end_writeback(inode);
return;
}
