xfs: nest qm_dqfrlist_lock inside the dquot qlock
Allow xfs_qm_dqput to work without trylock loops by nesting the freelist lock
inside the dquot qlock. In turn that requires trylocks in the reclaim path
instead, but given it's a classic tradeoff between fast and slow path, and
we follow the model of the inode and dentry caches.
Document our new lock order now that it has settled.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c
index d06d2a6..f1d3ccb 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c
@@ -39,20 +39,19 @@
#include "xfs_qm.h"
#include "xfs_trace.h"
-
/*
- LOCK ORDER
-
- inode lock (ilock)
- dquot hash-chain lock (hashlock)
- xqm dquot freelist lock (freelistlock
- mount's dquot list lock (mplistlock)
- user dquot lock - lock ordering among dquots is based on the uid or gid
- group dquot lock - similar to udquots. Between the two dquots, the udquot
- has to be locked first.
- pin lock - the dquot lock must be held to take this lock.
- flush lock - ditto.
-*/
+ * Lock order:
+ *
+ * ip->i_lock
+ * qh->qh_lock
+ * qi->qi_dqlist_lock
+ * dquot->q_qlock (xfs_dqlock() and friends)
+ * dquot->q_flush (xfs_dqflock() and friends)
+ * xfs_Gqm->qm_dqfrlist_lock
+ *
+ * If two dquots need to be locked the order is user before group/project,
+ * otherwise by the lowest id first, see xfs_dqlock2.
+ */
#ifdef DEBUG
xfs_buftarg_t *xfs_dqerror_target;
@@ -984,69 +983,49 @@
*/
void
xfs_qm_dqput(
- xfs_dquot_t *dqp)
+ struct xfs_dquot *dqp)
{
- xfs_dquot_t *gdqp;
+ struct xfs_dquot *gdqp;
ASSERT(dqp->q_nrefs > 0);
ASSERT(XFS_DQ_IS_LOCKED(dqp));
trace_xfs_dqput(dqp);
- if (dqp->q_nrefs != 1) {
- dqp->q_nrefs--;
+recurse:
+ if (--dqp->q_nrefs > 0) {
xfs_dqunlock(dqp);
return;
}
- /*
- * drop the dqlock and acquire the freelist and dqlock
- * in the right order; but try to get it out-of-order first
- */
- if (!mutex_trylock(&xfs_Gqm->qm_dqfrlist_lock)) {
- trace_xfs_dqput_wait(dqp);
- xfs_dqunlock(dqp);
- mutex_lock(&xfs_Gqm->qm_dqfrlist_lock);
- xfs_dqlock(dqp);
- }
+ trace_xfs_dqput_free(dqp);
- while (1) {
- gdqp = NULL;
-
- /* We can't depend on nrefs being == 1 here */
- if (--dqp->q_nrefs == 0) {
- trace_xfs_dqput_free(dqp);
-
- if (list_empty(&dqp->q_freelist)) {
- list_add_tail(&dqp->q_freelist, &xfs_Gqm->qm_dqfrlist);
- xfs_Gqm->qm_dqfrlist_cnt++;
- }
-
- /*
- * If we just added a udquot to the freelist, then
- * we want to release the gdquot reference that
- * it (probably) has. Otherwise it'll keep the
- * gdquot from getting reclaimed.
- */
- if ((gdqp = dqp->q_gdquot)) {
- /*
- * Avoid a recursive dqput call
- */
- xfs_dqlock(gdqp);
- dqp->q_gdquot = NULL;
- }
- }
- xfs_dqunlock(dqp);
-
- /*
- * If we had a group quota inside the user quota as a hint,
- * release it now.
- */
- if (! gdqp)
- break;
- dqp = gdqp;
+ mutex_lock(&xfs_Gqm->qm_dqfrlist_lock);
+ if (list_empty(&dqp->q_freelist)) {
+ list_add_tail(&dqp->q_freelist, &xfs_Gqm->qm_dqfrlist);
+ xfs_Gqm->qm_dqfrlist_cnt++;
}
mutex_unlock(&xfs_Gqm->qm_dqfrlist_lock);
+
+ /*
+ * If we just added a udquot to the freelist, then we want to release
+ * the gdquot reference that it (probably) has. Otherwise it'll keep
+ * the gdquot from getting reclaimed.
+ */
+ gdqp = dqp->q_gdquot;
+ if (gdqp) {
+ xfs_dqlock(gdqp);
+ dqp->q_gdquot = NULL;
+ }
+ xfs_dqunlock(dqp);
+
+ /*
+ * If we had a group quota hint, release it now.
+ */
+ if (gdqp) {
+ dqp = gdqp;
+ goto recurse;
+ }
}
/*
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
index f418731..22360bb 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
@@ -1668,7 +1668,9 @@
restart:
list_for_each_entry(dqp, &xfs_Gqm->qm_dqfrlist, q_freelist) {
struct xfs_mount *mp = dqp->q_mount;
- xfs_dqlock(dqp);
+
+ if (!xfs_dqlock_nowait(dqp))
+ continue;
/*
* This dquot has already been grabbed by dqlookup.
