blob: 29f3955b9af7e8b357e1b806e7ca496b1c1bc924 [file] [log] [blame]
#!/bin/bash
#
# This test is for bridge 'brouting', i.e. make some packets being routed
# rather than getting bridged even though they arrive on interface that is
# part of a bridge.
# eth0 br0 eth0
# setup is: ns1 <-> ns0 <-> ns2
# Kselftest framework requirement - SKIP code is 4.
ksft_skip=4
ret=0
ebtables -V > /dev/null 2>&1
if [ $? -ne 0 ];then
echo "SKIP: Could not run test without ebtables"
exit $ksft_skip
fi
ip -Version > /dev/null 2>&1
if [ $? -ne 0 ];then
echo "SKIP: Could not run test without ip tool"
exit $ksft_skip
fi
ip netns add ns0
ip netns add ns1
ip netns add ns2
ip link add veth0 netns ns0 type veth peer name eth0 netns ns1
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "SKIP: Can't create veth device"
exit $ksft_skip
fi
ip link add veth1 netns ns0 type veth peer name eth0 netns ns2
ip -net ns0 link set lo up
ip -net ns0 link set veth0 up
ip -net ns0 link set veth1 up
ip -net ns0 link add br0 type bridge
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "SKIP: Can't create bridge br0"
exit $ksft_skip
fi
ip -net ns0 link set veth0 master br0
ip -net ns0 link set veth1 master br0
ip -net ns0 link set br0 up
ip -net ns0 addr add 10.0.0.1/24 dev br0
# place both in same subnet, ns1 and ns2 connected via ns0:br0
for i in 1 2; do
ip -net ns$i link set lo up
ip -net ns$i link set eth0 up
ip -net ns$i addr add 10.0.0.1$i/24 dev eth0
done
test_ebtables_broute()
{
local cipt
# redirect is needed so the dstmac is rewritten to the bridge itself,
# ip stack won't process OTHERHOST (foreign unicast mac) packets.
ip netns exec ns0 ebtables -t broute -A BROUTING -p ipv4 --ip-protocol icmp -j redirect --redirect-target=DROP
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "SKIP: Could not add ebtables broute redirect rule"
return $ksft_skip
fi
# ping netns1, expected to not work (ip forwarding is off)
ip netns exec ns1 ping -q -c 1 10.0.0.12 > /dev/null 2>&1
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo "ERROR: ping works, should have failed" 1>&2
return 1
fi
# enable forwarding on both interfaces.
# neither needs an ip address, but at least the bridge needs
# an ip address in same network segment as ns1 and ns2 (ns0
# needs to be able to determine route for to-be-forwarded packet).
ip netns exec ns0 sysctl -q net.ipv4.conf.veth0.forwarding=1
ip netns exec ns0 sysctl -q net.ipv4.conf.veth1.forwarding=1
sleep 1
ip netns exec ns1 ping -q -c 1 10.0.0.12 > /dev/null
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "ERROR: ping did not work, but it should (broute+forward)" 1>&2
return 1
fi
echo "PASS: ns1/ns2 connectivity with active broute rule"
ip netns exec ns0 ebtables -t broute -F
# ping netns1, expected to work (frames are bridged)
ip netns exec ns1 ping -q -c 1 10.0.0.12 > /dev/null
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "ERROR: ping did not work, but it should (bridged)" 1>&2
return 1
fi
ip netns exec ns0 ebtables -t filter -A FORWARD -p ipv4 --ip-protocol icmp -j DROP
# ping netns1, expected to not work (DROP in bridge forward)
ip netns exec ns1 ping -q -c 1 10.0.0.12 > /dev/null 2>&1
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo "ERROR: ping works, should have failed (icmp forward drop)" 1>&2
return 1
fi
# re-activate brouter
ip netns exec ns0 ebtables -t broute -A BROUTING -p ipv4 --ip-protocol icmp -j redirect --redirect-target=DROP
ip netns exec ns2 ping -q -c 1 10.0.0.11 > /dev/null
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "ERROR: ping did not work, but it should (broute+forward 2)" 1>&2
return 1
fi
echo "PASS: ns1/ns2 connectivity with active broute rule and bridge forward drop"
return 0
}
# test basic connectivity
ip netns exec ns1 ping -c 1 -q 10.0.0.12 > /dev/null
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "ERROR: Could not reach ns2 from ns1" 1>&2
ret=1
fi
ip netns exec ns2 ping -c 1 -q 10.0.0.11 > /dev/null
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "ERROR: Could not reach ns1 from ns2" 1>&2
ret=1
fi
if [ $ret -eq 0 ];then
echo "PASS: netns connectivity: ns1 and ns2 can reach each other"
fi
test_ebtables_broute
ret=$?
for i in 0 1 2; do ip netns del ns$i;done
exit $ret