blk-crypto: rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile

blk_keyslot_manager is misnamed because it doesn't necessarily manage
keyslots.  It actually does several different things:

  - Contains the crypto capabilities of the device.

  - Provides functions to control the inline encryption hardware.
    Originally these were just for programming/evicting keyslots;
    however, new functionality (hardware-wrapped keys) will require new
    functions here which are unrelated to keyslots.  Moreover,
    device-mapper devices already (ab)use "keyslot_evict" to pass key
    eviction requests to their underlying devices even though
    device-mapper devices don't have any keyslots themselves (so it
    really should be "evict_key", not "keyslot_evict").

  - Sometimes (but not always!) it manages keyslots.  Originally it
    always did, but device-mapper devices don't have keyslots
    themselves, so they use a "passthrough keyslot manager" which
    doesn't actually manage keyslots.  This hack works, but the
    terminology is unnatural.  Also, some hardware doesn't have keyslots
    and thus also uses a "passthrough keyslot manager" (support for such
    hardware is yet to be upstreamed, but it will happen eventually).

Let's stop having keyslot managers which don't actually manage keyslots.
Instead, rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile.

This is a fairly big change, since for consistency it also has to update
keyslot manager-related function names, variable names, and comments --
not just the actual struct name.  However it's still a fairly
straightforward change, as it doesn't change any actual functionality.

Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # For MMC
Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211018180453.40441-4-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
diff --git a/block/blk-crypto.c b/block/blk-crypto.c
index 76ce7a5..ec9efee 100644
--- a/block/blk-crypto.c
+++ b/block/blk-crypto.c
@@ -218,8 +218,9 @@ static bool bio_crypt_check_alignment(struct bio *bio)
 
 blk_status_t __blk_crypto_init_request(struct request *rq)
 {
-	return blk_ksm_get_slot_for_key(rq->q->ksm, rq->crypt_ctx->bc_key,
-					&rq->crypt_keyslot);
+	return blk_crypto_get_keyslot(rq->q->crypto_profile,
+				      rq->crypt_ctx->bc_key,
+				      &rq->crypt_keyslot);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -233,7 +234,7 @@ blk_status_t __blk_crypto_init_request(struct request *rq)
  */
 void __blk_crypto_free_request(struct request *rq)
 {
-	blk_ksm_put_slot(rq->crypt_keyslot);
+	blk_crypto_put_keyslot(rq->crypt_keyslot);
 	mempool_free(rq->crypt_ctx, bio_crypt_ctx_pool);
 	blk_crypto_rq_set_defaults(rq);
 }
@@ -264,6 +265,7 @@ bool __blk_crypto_bio_prep(struct bio **bio_ptr)
 {
 	struct bio *bio = *bio_ptr;
 	const struct blk_crypto_key *bc_key = bio->bi_crypt_context->bc_key;
+	struct blk_crypto_profile *profile;
 
 	/* Error if bio has no data. */
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bio_has_data(bio))) {
@@ -280,8 +282,8 @@ bool __blk_crypto_bio_prep(struct bio **bio_ptr)
 	 * Success if device supports the encryption context, or if we succeeded
 	 * in falling back to the crypto API.
 	 */
-	if (blk_ksm_crypto_cfg_supported(bdev_get_queue(bio->bi_bdev)->ksm,
-					 &bc_key->crypto_cfg))
+	profile = bdev_get_queue(bio->bi_bdev)->crypto_profile;
+	if (__blk_crypto_cfg_supported(profile, &bc_key->crypto_cfg))
 		return true;
 
 	if (blk_crypto_fallback_bio_prep(bio_ptr))
@@ -357,7 +359,7 @@ bool blk_crypto_config_supported(struct request_queue *q,
 				 const struct blk_crypto_config *cfg)
 {
 	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_INLINE_ENCRYPTION_FALLBACK) ||
-	       blk_ksm_crypto_cfg_supported(q->ksm, cfg);
+	       __blk_crypto_cfg_supported(q->crypto_profile, cfg);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -378,7 +380,7 @@ bool blk_crypto_config_supported(struct request_queue *q,
 int blk_crypto_start_using_key(const struct blk_crypto_key *key,
 			       struct request_queue *q)
 {
-	if (blk_ksm_crypto_cfg_supported(q->ksm, &key->crypto_cfg))
+	if (__blk_crypto_cfg_supported(q->crypto_profile, &key->crypto_cfg))
 		return 0;
 	return blk_crypto_fallback_start_using_mode(key->crypto_cfg.crypto_mode);
 }
@@ -394,18 +396,17 @@ int blk_crypto_start_using_key(const struct blk_crypto_key *key,
  * evicted from any hardware that it might have been programmed into.  The key
  * must not be in use by any in-flight IO when this function is called.
  *
- * Return: 0 on success or if key is not present in the q's ksm, -err on error.
+ * Return: 0 on success or if the key wasn't in any keyslot; -errno on error.
  */
 int blk_crypto_evict_key(struct request_queue *q,
 			 const struct blk_crypto_key *key)
 {
-	if (blk_ksm_crypto_cfg_supported(q->ksm, &key->crypto_cfg))
-		return blk_ksm_evict_key(q->ksm, key);
+	if (__blk_crypto_cfg_supported(q->crypto_profile, &key->crypto_cfg))
+		return __blk_crypto_evict_key(q->crypto_profile, key);
 
 	/*
-	 * If the request queue's associated inline encryption hardware didn't
-	 * have support for the key, then the key might have been programmed
-	 * into the fallback keyslot manager, so try to evict from there.
+	 * If the request_queue didn't support the key, then blk-crypto-fallback
+	 * may have been used, so try to evict the key from blk-crypto-fallback.
 	 */
 	return blk_crypto_fallback_evict_key(key);
 }