bug: set warn variable before calling WARN()
This has hit me a couple of times already. I would be debugging code
and the system would simply hang and then reboot. Finally, I found that
the problem was caused by WARN_ON_ONCE() and friends.
The macro WARN_ON_ONCE(condition) is defined as:
static bool __section(.data.unlikely) __warned;
int __ret_warn_once = !!(condition);
if (unlikely(__ret_warn_once))
if (WARN_ON(!__warned))
__warned = true;
unlikely(__ret_warn_once);
Which looks great and all. But what I have hit, is an issue when
WARN_ON() itself hits the same WARN_ON_ONCE() code. Because, the
variable __warned is not yet set. Then it too calls WARN_ON() and that
triggers the warning again. It keeps doing this until the stack is
overflowed and the system crashes.
By setting __warned first before calling WARN_ON() makes the original
WARN_ON_ONCE() really only warn once, and not an infinite amount of
times if the WARN_ON() also triggers the warning.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bug.h b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
index 630dd23..fdf6fa0 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/bug.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
@@ -110,9 +110,10 @@
static bool __section(.data.unlikely) __warned; \
int __ret_warn_once = !!(condition); \
\
- if (unlikely(__ret_warn_once)) \
- if (WARN_ON(!__warned)) \
- __warned = true; \
+ if (unlikely(__ret_warn_once && !__warned)) { \
+ __warned = true; \
+ WARN_ON(1); \
+ } \
unlikely(__ret_warn_once); \
})
@@ -120,9 +121,10 @@
static bool __section(.data.unlikely) __warned; \
int __ret_warn_once = !!(condition); \
\
- if (unlikely(__ret_warn_once)) \
- if (WARN(!__warned, format)) \
- __warned = true; \
+ if (unlikely(__ret_warn_once && !__warned)) { \
+ __warned = true; \
+ WARN(1, format); \
+ } \
unlikely(__ret_warn_once); \
})
@@ -130,9 +132,10 @@
static bool __section(.data.unlikely) __warned; \
int __ret_warn_once = !!(condition); \
\
- if (unlikely(__ret_warn_once)) \
- if (WARN_TAINT(!__warned, taint, format)) \
- __warned = true; \
+ if (unlikely(__ret_warn_once && !__warned)) { \
+ __warned = true; \
+ WARN_TAINT(1, taint, format); \
+ } \
unlikely(__ret_warn_once); \
})
