commit e21294a7aaae32c5d7154b187113a04db5852e37
author Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Mon Oct 25 10:50:57 2021 -0500
committer Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Fri Oct 29 14:31:34 2021 -0500
tree fe8235daea64e169bfbd20d2f9bd395ea012b8b1
parent 0fdc0c4279c822eda8f5ce3b7689d34f4cac2e82

signal: Replace force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) with force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV)

Now that force_fatal_sig exists it is unnecessary and a bit confusing
to use force_sigsegv in cases where the simpler force_fatal_sig is
wanted.  So change every instance we can to make the code clearer.

Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/877de7jrev.fsf@disp2133
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

fs/exec.c

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index a098c13..ac7b51b 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1852,7 +1852,7 @@ static int bprm_execve(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
 	 * SIGSEGV.
 	 */
 	if (bprm->point_of_no_return && !fatal_signal_pending(current))
-		force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV);
+		force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV);
 
 out_unmark:
 	current->fs->in_exec = 0;