| commit | e6c0433e270ae96fb62fd30cf7c2c7bf57d5391f | [log] [tgz] |
|---|---|---|
| author | Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> | Wed Apr 22 23:20:52 2020 -0400 |
| committer | Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> | Fri May 29 11:05:54 2020 -0400 |
| tree | aa74b98cdbafad36d7bb617f5a3bbf89406b2d01 | |
| parent | d2659e583eb32fddea4f27a346de84f88be6119f [diff] |
lpfc_debugfs: get rid of pointless access_ok() No, you do NOT need to "protect copy from user" that way. Incidentally, your userland ABI stinks. I understand that you wanted to accept "reset" and "reset\n" as equivalent, but I suspect that accepting "reset this, you !@^!@!" had been an accident. Nothing to do about that now - it is a userland ABI... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>