selinux: selinux_bprm_committed_creds() should wake up ->real_parent, not ->parent.
We shouldn't worry about the tracer if current is ptraced, exec() must not
succeed if the tracer has no rights to trace this task after cred changing.
But we should notify ->real_parent which is, well, real parent.
Also, we don't need _irq to take tasklist, and we don't need parent's
->siglock to wake_up_interruptible(real_parent->signal->wait_chldexit).
Since we hold tasklist, real_parent->signal must be stable. Otherwise
spin_lock(siglock) is not safe too and can't help anyway.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 5a34511..39046dd 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -2371,10 +2371,8 @@
{
const struct task_security_struct *tsec = current_security();
struct itimerval itimer;
- struct sighand_struct *psig;
u32 osid, sid;
int rc, i;
- unsigned long flags;
osid = tsec->osid;
sid = tsec->sid;
@@ -2405,12 +2403,9 @@
/* Wake up the parent if it is waiting so that it can recheck
* wait permission to the new task SID. */
- read_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
- psig = current->parent->sighand;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&psig->siglock, flags);
- wake_up_interruptible(¤t->parent->signal->wait_chldexit);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&psig->siglock, flags);
- read_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ wake_up_interruptible(¤t->real_parent->signal->wait_chldexit);
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
}
/* superblock security operations */