lockdep: Remove lockdep_hardirq{s_enabled,_context}() argument
Now that the macros use per-cpu data, we no longer need the argument.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200623083721.571835311@infradead.org
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index ab4ffbe..c9ea05e 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -2062,9 +2062,9 @@ print_bad_irq_dependency(struct task_struct *curr,
pr_warn("-----------------------------------------------------\n");
pr_warn("%s/%d [HC%u[%lu]:SC%u[%lu]:HE%u:SE%u] is trying to acquire:\n",
curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr),
- lockdep_hardirq_context(curr), hardirq_count() >> HARDIRQ_SHIFT,
+ lockdep_hardirq_context(), hardirq_count() >> HARDIRQ_SHIFT,
curr->softirq_context, softirq_count() >> SOFTIRQ_SHIFT,
- lockdep_hardirqs_enabled(curr),
+ lockdep_hardirqs_enabled(),
curr->softirqs_enabled);
print_lock(next);
@@ -3331,9 +3331,9 @@ print_usage_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
pr_warn("%s/%d [HC%u[%lu]:SC%u[%lu]:HE%u:SE%u] takes:\n",
curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr),
- lockdep_hardirq_context(curr), hardirq_count() >> HARDIRQ_SHIFT,
+ lockdep_hardirq_context(), hardirq_count() >> HARDIRQ_SHIFT,
lockdep_softirq_context(curr), softirq_count() >> SOFTIRQ_SHIFT,
- lockdep_hardirqs_enabled(curr),
+ lockdep_hardirqs_enabled(),
lockdep_softirqs_enabled(curr));
print_lock(this);
@@ -3658,7 +3658,7 @@ void lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(unsigned long ip)
if (unlikely(current->lockdep_recursion & LOCKDEP_RECURSION_MASK))
return;
- if (unlikely(lockdep_hardirqs_enabled(current))) {
+ if (unlikely(lockdep_hardirqs_enabled())) {
/*
* Neither irq nor preemption are disabled here
* so this is racy by nature but losing one hit
@@ -3686,7 +3686,7 @@ void lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(unsigned long ip)
* Can't allow enabling interrupts while in an interrupt handler,
* that's general bad form and such. Recursion, limited stack etc..
*/
- if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lockdep_hardirq_context(current)))
+ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lockdep_hardirq_context()))
return;
current->hardirq_chain_key = current->curr_chain_key;
@@ -3724,7 +3724,7 @@ void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_on(unsigned long ip)
if (unlikely(current->lockdep_recursion & LOCKDEP_RECURSION_MASK))
return;
- if (lockdep_hardirqs_enabled(curr)) {
+ if (lockdep_hardirqs_enabled()) {
/*
* Neither irq nor preemption are disabled here
* so this is racy by nature but losing one hit
@@ -3783,7 +3783,7 @@ void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_off(unsigned long ip)
if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()))
return;
- if (lockdep_hardirqs_enabled(curr)) {
+ if (lockdep_hardirqs_enabled()) {
/*
* We have done an ON -> OFF transition:
*/
@@ -3832,7 +3832,7 @@ void lockdep_softirqs_on(unsigned long ip)
* usage bit for all held locks, if hardirqs are
* enabled too:
*/
- if (lockdep_hardirqs_enabled(curr))
+ if (lockdep_hardirqs_enabled())
mark_held_locks(curr, LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ);
lockdep_recursion_finish();
}
@@ -3881,7 +3881,7 @@ mark_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *hlock, int check)
*/
if (!hlock->trylock) {
if (hlock->read) {
- if (lockdep_hardirq_context(curr))
+ if (lockdep_hardirq_context())
if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock,
LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ))
return 0;
@@ -3890,7 +3890,7 @@ mark_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *hlock, int check)
LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ))
return 0;
} else {
- if (lockdep_hardirq_context(curr))
+ if (lockdep_hardirq_context())
if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ))
return 0;
if (curr->softirq_context)
@@ -3928,7 +3928,7 @@ mark_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *hlock, int check)
static inline unsigned int task_irq_context(struct task_struct *task)
{
- return LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT * !!lockdep_hardirq_context(task) +
+ return LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT * !!lockdep_hardirq_context() +
LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT * !!task->softirq_context;
}
@@ -4021,7 +4021,7 @@ static inline short task_wait_context(struct task_struct *curr)
* Set appropriate wait type for the context; for IRQs we have to take
* into account force_irqthread as that is implied by PREEMPT_RT.
*/
- if (lockdep_hardirq_context(curr)) {
+ if (lockdep_hardirq_context()) {
/*
* Check if force_irqthreads will run us threaded.
*/
@@ -4864,11 +4864,11 @@ static void check_flags(unsigned long flags)
return;
if (irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) {
- if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lockdep_hardirqs_enabled(current))) {
+ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lockdep_hardirqs_enabled())) {
printk("possible reason: unannotated irqs-off.\n");
}
} else {
- if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!lockdep_hardirqs_enabled(current))) {
+ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!lockdep_hardirqs_enabled())) {
printk("possible reason: unannotated irqs-on.\n");
}
}
