blob: 07e37d4a17ff3272d19ca259568b7cadef883b60 [file] [log] [blame]
From 2909bfbc97559cf3e28c9045f64e3078aacca354 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 17:59:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] configure.ac: use CC instead of gcc, full link for stack
protector test
Using gcc directly is incorrect when cross-compiling, $CC should be
used instead.
Also, for the stack protector test, a full link is needed, since just
the compilation can work, but the link can fail due to libssp not
being available in the toolchain.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
---
configure.ac | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index c1193c6..61efbc5 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ else
echo $ECHO_N "checking compile warning flags ... $ECHO_C"
cfwarn="-Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-sign-conversion -Wunused-result -Wgnu-designator"
echo "int main() { return(1); }" >$tmpc
- gcc -o $tmpo -c $cfwarn $tmpc >/dev/null 2>&1
+ $CC -o $tmpo -c $cfwarn $tmpc >/dev/null 2>&1
if test $? -ne 0 ; then
cfwarn=
echo "skip"
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ else
echo $ECHO_N "checking compile fortify flags ... $ECHO_C"
cfhard="-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2"
echo "int main() { return(1); }" >$tmpc
- gcc -o $tmpo -c $cfhard $tmpc >/dev/null 2>&1
+ $CC -o $tmpo $cfhard $tmpc >/dev/null 2>&1
if test $? -ne 0 ; then
cfhard=
echo "skip"
--
2.1.0