blob: 51ffc045b16eb55e02a8f3057ddb830bd44c9f24 [file] [log] [blame]
From e4ef92852023f4e2f192d3c47220dc75930a615c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:41:31 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] build: improve stack protector check
Testing a toolchain for proper -fstack-protector must go beyond ensuring
the compiler and linker accept the option.
If the test C program does nothing with the stack then guards aren't
inserted and/or are optimized away giving the false impression that it
works when in fact the libc might not support it.
Update the check to a program that uses the stack, hence making a link
fail if proper support isn't available, for example in non-ssp enabled
uclibc toolchains like this:
test.c:(.text.startup+0x64): undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
---
buildtools/wafsamba/samba_autoconf.py | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_autoconf.py b/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_autoconf.py
index c5f132c..ef34b00 100644
--- a/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_autoconf.py
+++ b/buildtools/wafsamba/samba_autoconf.py
@@ -657,9 +657,23 @@ def SAMBA_CONFIG_H(conf, path=None):
if not IN_LAUNCH_DIR(conf):
return
- if conf.CHECK_CFLAGS(['-fstack-protector']) and conf.CHECK_LDFLAGS(['-fstack-protector']):
- conf.ADD_CFLAGS('-fstack-protector')
- conf.ADD_LDFLAGS('-fstack-protector')
+ # we need to build real code that can't be optimized away to test
+ if conf.check(fragment='''
+ #include <stdio.h>
+
+ int main(void)
+ {
+ char t[100000];
+ while (fgets(t, sizeof(t), stdin));
+ return 0;
+ }
+ ''',
+ execute=0,
+ ccflags='-fstack-protector',
+ ldflags='-fstack-protector',
+ msg='Checking if toolchain accepts -fstack-protector'):
+ conf.ADD_CFLAGS('-fstack-protector')
+ conf.ADD_LDFLAGS('-fstack-protector')
if Options.options.debug:
conf.ADD_CFLAGS('-g', testflags=True)
--
2.4.6