| /* |
| * SpanDSP - a series of DSP components for telephony |
| * |
| * echo.c - A line echo canceller. This code is being developed |
| * against and partially complies with G168. |
| * |
| * Written by Steve Underwood <steveu@coppice.org> |
| * and David Rowe <david_at_rowetel_dot_com> |
| * |
| * Copyright (C) 2001, 2003 Steve Underwood, 2007 David Rowe |
| * |
| * Based on a bit from here, a bit from there, eye of toad, ear of |
| * bat, 15 years of failed attempts by David and a few fried brain |
| * cells. |
| * |
| * All rights reserved. |
| * |
| * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify |
| * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2, as |
| * published by the Free Software Foundation. |
| * |
| * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, |
| * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of |
| * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the |
| * GNU General Public License for more details. |
| * |
| * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License |
| * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software |
| * Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. |
| */ |
| |
| /*! \file */ |
| |
| /* Implementation Notes |
| David Rowe |
| April 2007 |
| |
| This code started life as Steve's NLMS algorithm with a tap |
| rotation algorithm to handle divergence during double talk. I |
| added a Geigel Double Talk Detector (DTD) [2] and performed some |
| G168 tests. However I had trouble meeting the G168 requirements, |
| especially for double talk - there were always cases where my DTD |
| failed, for example where near end speech was under the 6dB |
| threshold required for declaring double talk. |
| |
| So I tried a two path algorithm [1], which has so far given better |
| results. The original tap rotation/Geigel algorithm is available |
| in SVN http://svn.rowetel.com/software/oslec/tags/before_16bit. |
| It's probably possible to make it work if some one wants to put some |
| serious work into it. |
| |
| At present no special treatment is provided for tones, which |
| generally cause NLMS algorithms to diverge. Initial runs of a |
| subset of the G168 tests for tones (e.g ./echo_test 6) show the |
| current algorithm is passing OK, which is kind of surprising. The |
| full set of tests needs to be performed to confirm this result. |
| |
| One other interesting change is that I have managed to get the NLMS |
| code to work with 16 bit coefficients, rather than the original 32 |
| bit coefficents. This reduces the MIPs and storage required. |
| I evaulated the 16 bit port using g168_tests.sh and listening tests |
| on 4 real-world samples. |
| |
| I also attempted the implementation of a block based NLMS update |
| [2] but although this passes g168_tests.sh it didn't converge well |
| on the real-world samples. I have no idea why, perhaps a scaling |
| problem. The block based code is also available in SVN |
| http://svn.rowetel.com/software/oslec/tags/before_16bit. If this |
| code can be debugged, it will lead to further reduction in MIPS, as |
| the block update code maps nicely onto DSP instruction sets (it's a |
| dot product) compared to the current sample-by-sample update. |
| |
| Steve also has some nice notes on echo cancellers in echo.h |
| |
| References: |
| |
| [1] Ochiai, Areseki, and Ogihara, "Echo Canceller with Two Echo |
| Path Models", IEEE Transactions on communications, COM-25, |
| No. 6, June |
| 1977. |
| http://www.rowetel.com/images/echo/dual_path_paper.pdf |
| |
| [2] The classic, very useful paper that tells you how to |
| actually build a real world echo canceller: |
| Messerschmitt, Hedberg, Cole, Haoui, Winship, "Digital Voice |
| Echo Canceller with a TMS320020, |
| http://www.rowetel.com/images/echo/spra129.pdf |
| |
| [3] I have written a series of blog posts on this work, here is |
| Part 1: http://www.rowetel.com/blog/?p=18 |
| |
| [4] The source code http://svn.rowetel.com/software/oslec/ |
| |
| [5] A nice reference on LMS filters: |
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_mean_squares_filter |
| |
| Credits: |
| |
| Thanks to Steve Underwood, Jean-Marc Valin, and Ramakrishnan |
| Muthukrishnan for their suggestions and email discussions. Thanks |
| also to those people who collected echo samples for me such as |
| Mark, Pawel, and Pavel. |
| */ |
| |
| #include <linux/kernel.h> |
| #include <linux/module.h> |
| #include <linux/slab.h> |
| |
| #include "echo.h" |
| |
| #define MIN_TX_POWER_FOR_ADAPTION 64 |
| #define MIN_RX_POWER_FOR_ADAPTION 64 |
| #define DTD_HANGOVER 600 /* 600 samples, or 75ms */ |
| #define DC_LOG2BETA 3 /* log2() of DC filter Beta */ |
| |
| /* adapting coeffs using the traditional stochastic descent (N)LMS algorithm */ |
| |
| #ifdef __bfin__ |
| static inline void lms_adapt_bg(struct oslec_state *ec, int clean, int shift) |
| { |
| int i; |
| int offset1; |
| int offset2; |
| int factor; |
| int exp; |
| int16_t *phist; |
| int n; |
| |
| if (shift > 0) |
| factor = clean << shift; |
| else |
| factor = clean >> -shift; |
| |
| /* Update the FIR taps */ |
| |
| offset2 = ec->curr_pos; |
| offset1 = ec->taps - offset2; |
| phist = &ec->fir_state_bg.history[offset2]; |
| |
| /* st: and en: help us locate the assembler in echo.s */ |
| |
| /* asm("st:"); */ |
| n = ec->taps; |
| for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { |
| exp = *phist++ * factor; |
| ec->fir_taps16[1][i] += (int16_t) ((exp + (1 << 14)) >> 15); |
| } |
| /* asm("en:"); */ |
| |
| /* Note the asm for the inner loop above generated by Blackfin gcc |
| 4.1.1 is pretty good (note even parallel instructions used): |
| |
| R0 = W [P0++] (X); |
| R0 *= R2; |
| R0 = R0 + R3 (NS) || |
| R1 = W [P1] (X) || |
| nop; |
| R0 >>>= 15; |
| R0 = R0 + R1; |
| W [P1++] = R0; |
| |
| A block based update algorithm would be much faster but the |
| above can't be improved on much. Every instruction saved in |
| the loop above is 2 MIPs/ch! The for loop above is where the |
| Blackfin spends most of it's time - about 17 MIPs/ch measured |
| with speedtest.c with 256 taps (32ms). Write-back and |
| Write-through cache gave about the same performance. |
| */ |
| } |
| |
| /* |
| IDEAS for further optimisation of lms_adapt_bg(): |
| |
| 1/ The rounding is quite costly. Could we keep as 32 bit coeffs |
| then make filter pluck the MS 16-bits of the coeffs when filtering? |
| However this would lower potential optimisation of filter, as I |
| think the dual-MAC architecture requires packed 16 bit coeffs. |
| |
| 2/ Block based update would be more efficient, as per comments above, |
| could use dual MAC architecture. |
| |
| 3/ Look for same sample Blackfin LMS code, see if we can get dual-MAC |
| packing. |
| |
| 4/ Execute the whole e/c in a block of say 20ms rather than sample |
| by sample. Processing a few samples every ms is inefficient. |
| */ |
| |
| #else |
| static inline void lms_adapt_bg(struct oslec_state *ec, int clean, int shift) |
| { |
| int i; |
| |
| int offset1; |
| int offset2; |
| int factor; |
| int exp; |
| |
| if (shift > 0) |
| factor = clean << shift; |
| else |
| factor = clean >> -shift; |
| |
| /* Update the FIR taps */ |
| |
| offset2 = ec->curr_pos; |
| offset1 = ec->taps - offset2; |
| |
| for (i = ec->taps - 1; i >= offset1; i--) { |
| exp = (ec->fir_state_bg.history[i - offset1] * factor); |
| ec->fir_taps16[1][i] += (int16_t) ((exp + (1 << 14)) >> 15); |
| } |
| for (; i >= 0; i--) { |
| exp = (ec->fir_state_bg.history[i + offset2] * factor); |
| ec->fir_taps16[1][i] += (int16_t) ((exp + (1 << 14)) >> 15); |
| } |
| } |
| #endif |
| |
| static inline int top_bit(unsigned int bits) |
| { |
| if (bits == 0) |
| return -1; |
| else |
| return (int)fls((int32_t) bits) - 1; |
| } |
| |
| struct oslec_state *oslec_create(int len, int adaption_mode) |
| { |
| struct oslec_state *ec; |
| int i; |
| const int16_t *history; |
| |
| ec = kzalloc(sizeof(*ec), GFP_KERNEL); |
| if (!ec) |
| return NULL; |
| |
| ec->taps = len; |
| ec->log2taps = top_bit(len); |
| ec->curr_pos = ec->taps - 1; |
| |
| ec->fir_taps16[0] = |
| kcalloc(ec->taps, sizeof(int16_t), GFP_KERNEL); |
| if (!ec->fir_taps16[0]) |
| goto error_oom_0; |
| |
| ec->fir_taps16[1] = |
| kcalloc(ec->taps, sizeof(int16_t), GFP_KERNEL); |
| if (!ec->fir_taps16[1]) |
| goto error_oom_1; |
| |
| history = fir16_create(&ec->fir_state, ec->fir_taps16[0], ec->taps); |
| if (!history) |
| goto error_state; |
| history = fir16_create(&ec->fir_state_bg, ec->fir_taps16[1], ec->taps); |
| if (!history) |
| goto error_state_bg; |
| |
| for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) |
| ec->xvtx[i] = ec->yvtx[i] = ec->xvrx[i] = ec->yvrx[i] = 0; |
| |
| ec->cng_level = 1000; |
| oslec_adaption_mode(ec, adaption_mode); |
| |
| ec->snapshot = kcalloc(ec->taps, sizeof(int16_t), GFP_KERNEL); |
| if (!ec->snapshot) |
| goto error_snap; |
| |
| ec->cond_met = 0; |
| ec->Pstates = 0; |
| ec->Ltxacc = ec->Lrxacc = ec->Lcleanacc = ec->Lclean_bgacc = 0; |
| ec->Ltx = ec->Lrx = ec->Lclean = ec->Lclean_bg = 0; |
| ec->tx_1 = ec->tx_2 = ec->rx_1 = ec->rx_2 = 0; |
| ec->Lbgn = ec->Lbgn_acc = 0; |
| ec->Lbgn_upper = 200; |
| ec->Lbgn_upper_acc = ec->Lbgn_upper << 13; |
| |
| return ec; |
| |
| error_snap: |
| fir16_free(&ec->fir_state_bg); |
| error_state_bg: |
| fir16_free(&ec->fir_state); |
| error_state: |
| kfree(ec->fir_taps16[1]); |
| error_oom_1: |
| kfree(ec->fir_taps16[0]); |
| error_oom_0: |
| kfree(ec); |
| return NULL; |
| } |
| EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_create); |
| |
| void oslec_free(struct oslec_state *ec) |
| { |
| int i; |
| |
| fir16_free(&ec->fir_state); |
| fir16_free(&ec->fir_state_bg); |
| for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) |
| kfree(ec->fir_taps16[i]); |
| kfree(ec->snapshot); |
| kfree(ec); |
| } |
| EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_free); |
| |
| void oslec_adaption_mode(struct oslec_state *ec, int adaption_mode) |
| { |
| ec->adaption_mode = adaption_mode; |
| } |
| EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_adaption_mode); |
| |
| void oslec_flush(struct oslec_state *ec) |
| { |
| int i; |
| |
| ec->Ltxacc = ec->Lrxacc = ec->Lcleanacc = ec->Lclean_bgacc = 0; |
| ec->Ltx = ec->Lrx = ec->Lclean = ec->Lclean_bg = 0; |
| ec->tx_1 = ec->tx_2 = ec->rx_1 = ec->rx_2 = 0; |
| |
| ec->Lbgn = ec->Lbgn_acc = 0; |
| ec->Lbgn_upper = 200; |
| ec->Lbgn_upper_acc = ec->Lbgn_upper << 13; |
| |
| ec->nonupdate_dwell = 0; |
| |
| fir16_flush(&ec->fir_state); |
| fir16_flush(&ec->fir_state_bg); |
| ec->fir_state.curr_pos = ec->taps - 1; |
| ec->fir_state_bg.curr_pos = ec->taps - 1; |
| for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) |
| memset(ec->fir_taps16[i], 0, ec->taps * sizeof(int16_t)); |
| |
| ec->curr_pos = ec->taps - 1; |
| ec->Pstates = 0; |
| } |
| EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_flush); |
| |
| void oslec_snapshot(struct oslec_state *ec) |
| { |
| memcpy(ec->snapshot, ec->fir_taps16[0], ec->taps * sizeof(int16_t)); |
| } |
| EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_snapshot); |
| |
| /* Dual Path Echo Canceller */ |
| |
| int16_t oslec_update(struct oslec_state *ec, int16_t tx, int16_t rx) |
| { |
| int32_t echo_value; |
| int clean_bg; |
| int tmp; |
| int tmp1; |
| |
| /* |
| * Input scaling was found be required to prevent problems when tx |
| * starts clipping. Another possible way to handle this would be the |
| * filter coefficent scaling. |
| */ |
| |
| ec->tx = tx; |
| ec->rx = rx; |
| tx >>= 1; |
| rx >>= 1; |
| |
| /* |
| * Filter DC, 3dB point is 160Hz (I think), note 32 bit precision |
| * required otherwise values do not track down to 0. Zero at DC, Pole |
| * at (1-Beta) on real axis. Some chip sets (like Si labs) don't |
| * need this, but something like a $10 X100P card does. Any DC really |
| * slows down convergence. |
| * |
| * Note: removes some low frequency from the signal, this reduces the |
| * speech quality when listening to samples through headphones but may |
| * not be obvious through a telephone handset. |
| * |
| * Note that the 3dB frequency in radians is approx Beta, e.g. for Beta |
| * = 2^(-3) = 0.125, 3dB freq is 0.125 rads = 159Hz. |
| */ |
| |
| if (ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_USE_RX_HPF) { |
| tmp = rx << 15; |
| |
| /* |
| * Make sure the gain of the HPF is 1.0. This can still |
| * saturate a little under impulse conditions, and it might |
| * roll to 32768 and need clipping on sustained peak level |
| * signals. However, the scale of such clipping is small, and |
| * the error due to any saturation should not markedly affect |
| * the downstream processing. |
| */ |
| tmp -= (tmp >> 4); |
| |
| ec->rx_1 += -(ec->rx_1 >> DC_LOG2BETA) + tmp - ec->rx_2; |
| |
| /* |
| * hard limit filter to prevent clipping. Note that at this |
| * stage rx should be limited to +/- 16383 due to right shift |
| * above |
| */ |
| tmp1 = ec->rx_1 >> 15; |
| if (tmp1 > 16383) |
| tmp1 = 16383; |
| if (tmp1 < -16383) |
| tmp1 = -16383; |
| rx = tmp1; |
| ec->rx_2 = tmp; |
| } |
| |
| /* Block average of power in the filter states. Used for |
| adaption power calculation. */ |
| |
| { |
| int new, old; |
| |
| /* efficient "out with the old and in with the new" algorithm so |
| we don't have to recalculate over the whole block of |
| samples. */ |
| new = (int)tx * (int)tx; |
| old = (int)ec->fir_state.history[ec->fir_state.curr_pos] * |
| (int)ec->fir_state.history[ec->fir_state.curr_pos]; |
| ec->Pstates += |
| ((new - old) + (1 << (ec->log2taps - 1))) >> ec->log2taps; |
| if (ec->Pstates < 0) |
| ec->Pstates = 0; |
| } |
| |
| /* Calculate short term average levels using simple single pole IIRs */ |
| |
| ec->Ltxacc += abs(tx) - ec->Ltx; |
| ec->Ltx = (ec->Ltxacc + (1 << 4)) >> 5; |
| ec->Lrxacc += abs(rx) - ec->Lrx; |
| ec->Lrx = (ec->Lrxacc + (1 << 4)) >> 5; |
| |
| /* Foreground filter */ |
| |
| ec->fir_state.coeffs = ec->fir_taps16[0]; |
| echo_value = fir16(&ec->fir_state, tx); |
| ec->clean = rx - echo_value; |
| ec->Lcleanacc += abs(ec->clean) - ec->Lclean; |
| ec->Lclean = (ec->Lcleanacc + (1 << 4)) >> 5; |
| |
| /* Background filter */ |
| |
| echo_value = fir16(&ec->fir_state_bg, tx); |
| clean_bg = rx - echo_value; |
| ec->Lclean_bgacc += abs(clean_bg) - ec->Lclean_bg; |
| ec->Lclean_bg = (ec->Lclean_bgacc + (1 << 4)) >> 5; |
| |
| /* Background Filter adaption */ |
| |
| /* Almost always adap bg filter, just simple DT and energy |
| detection to minimise adaption in cases of strong double talk. |
| However this is not critical for the dual path algorithm. |
| */ |
| ec->factor = 0; |
| ec->shift = 0; |
| if ((ec->nonupdate_dwell == 0)) { |
| int P, logP, shift; |
| |
| /* Determine: |
| |
| f = Beta * clean_bg_rx/P ------ (1) |
| |
| where P is the total power in the filter states. |
| |
| The Boffins have shown that if we obey (1) we converge |
| quickly and avoid instability. |
| |
| The correct factor f must be in Q30, as this is the fixed |
| point format required by the lms_adapt_bg() function, |
| therefore the scaled version of (1) is: |
| |
| (2^30) * f = (2^30) * Beta * clean_bg_rx/P |
| factor = (2^30) * Beta * clean_bg_rx/P ----- (2) |
| |
| We have chosen Beta = 0.25 by experiment, so: |
| |
| factor = (2^30) * (2^-2) * clean_bg_rx/P |
| |
| (30 - 2 - log2(P)) |
| factor = clean_bg_rx 2 ----- (3) |
| |
| To avoid a divide we approximate log2(P) as top_bit(P), |
| which returns the position of the highest non-zero bit in |
| P. This approximation introduces an error as large as a |
| factor of 2, but the algorithm seems to handle it OK. |
| |
| Come to think of it a divide may not be a big deal on a |
| modern DSP, so its probably worth checking out the cycles |
| for a divide versus a top_bit() implementation. |
| */ |
| |
| P = MIN_TX_POWER_FOR_ADAPTION + ec->Pstates; |
| logP = top_bit(P) + ec->log2taps; |
| shift = 30 - 2 - logP; |
| ec->shift = shift; |
| |
| lms_adapt_bg(ec, clean_bg, shift); |
| } |
| |
| /* very simple DTD to make sure we dont try and adapt with strong |
| near end speech */ |
| |
| ec->adapt = 0; |
| if ((ec->Lrx > MIN_RX_POWER_FOR_ADAPTION) && (ec->Lrx > ec->Ltx)) |
| ec->nonupdate_dwell = DTD_HANGOVER; |
| if (ec->nonupdate_dwell) |
| ec->nonupdate_dwell--; |
| |
| /* Transfer logic */ |
| |
| /* These conditions are from the dual path paper [1], I messed with |
| them a bit to improve performance. */ |
| |
| if ((ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_USE_ADAPTION) && |
| (ec->nonupdate_dwell == 0) && |
| /* (ec->Lclean_bg < 0.875*ec->Lclean) */ |
| (8 * ec->Lclean_bg < 7 * ec->Lclean) && |
| /* (ec->Lclean_bg < 0.125*ec->Ltx) */ |
| (8 * ec->Lclean_bg < ec->Ltx)) { |
| if (ec->cond_met == 6) { |
| /* |
| * BG filter has had better results for 6 consecutive |
| * samples |
| */ |
| ec->adapt = 1; |
| memcpy(ec->fir_taps16[0], ec->fir_taps16[1], |
| ec->taps * sizeof(int16_t)); |
| } else |
| ec->cond_met++; |
| } else |
| ec->cond_met = 0; |
| |
| /* Non-Linear Processing */ |
| |
| ec->clean_nlp = ec->clean; |
| if (ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_USE_NLP) { |
| /* |
| * Non-linear processor - a fancy way to say "zap small |
| * signals, to avoid residual echo due to (uLaw/ALaw) |
| * non-linearity in the channel.". |
| */ |
| |
| if ((16 * ec->Lclean < ec->Ltx)) { |
| /* |
| * Our e/c has improved echo by at least 24 dB (each |
| * factor of 2 is 6dB, so 2*2*2*2=16 is the same as |
| * 6+6+6+6=24dB) |
| */ |
| if (ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_USE_CNG) { |
| ec->cng_level = ec->Lbgn; |
| |
| /* |
| * Very elementary comfort noise generation. |
| * Just random numbers rolled off very vaguely |
| * Hoth-like. DR: This noise doesn't sound |
| * quite right to me - I suspect there are some |
| * overflow issues in the filtering as it's too |
| * "crackly". |
| * TODO: debug this, maybe just play noise at |
| * high level or look at spectrum. |
| */ |
| |
| ec->cng_rndnum = |
| 1664525U * ec->cng_rndnum + 1013904223U; |
| ec->cng_filter = |
| ((ec->cng_rndnum & 0xFFFF) - 32768 + |
| 5 * ec->cng_filter) >> 3; |
| ec->clean_nlp = |
| (ec->cng_filter * ec->cng_level * 8) >> 14; |
| |
| } else if (ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_USE_CLIP) { |
| /* This sounds much better than CNG */ |
| if (ec->clean_nlp > ec->Lbgn) |
| ec->clean_nlp = ec->Lbgn; |
| if (ec->clean_nlp < -ec->Lbgn) |
| ec->clean_nlp = -ec->Lbgn; |
| } else { |
| /* |
| * just mute the residual, doesn't sound very |
| * good, used mainly in G168 tests |
| */ |
| ec->clean_nlp = 0; |
| } |
| } else { |
| /* |
| * Background noise estimator. I tried a few |
| * algorithms here without much luck. This very simple |
| * one seems to work best, we just average the level |
| * using a slow (1 sec time const) filter if the |
| * current level is less than a (experimentally |
| * derived) constant. This means we dont include high |
| * level signals like near end speech. When combined |
| * with CNG or especially CLIP seems to work OK. |
| */ |
| if (ec->Lclean < 40) { |
| ec->Lbgn_acc += abs(ec->clean) - ec->Lbgn; |
| ec->Lbgn = (ec->Lbgn_acc + (1 << 11)) >> 12; |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| /* Roll around the taps buffer */ |
| if (ec->curr_pos <= 0) |
| ec->curr_pos = ec->taps; |
| ec->curr_pos--; |
| |
| if (ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_DISABLE) |
| ec->clean_nlp = rx; |
| |
| /* Output scaled back up again to match input scaling */ |
| |
| return (int16_t) ec->clean_nlp << 1; |
| } |
| EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_update); |
| |
| /* This function is separated from the echo canceller is it is usually called |
| as part of the tx process. See rx HP (DC blocking) filter above, it's |
| the same design. |
| |
| Some soft phones send speech signals with a lot of low frequency |
| energy, e.g. down to 20Hz. This can make the hybrid non-linear |
| which causes the echo canceller to fall over. This filter can help |
| by removing any low frequency before it gets to the tx port of the |
| hybrid. |
| |
| It can also help by removing and DC in the tx signal. DC is bad |
| for LMS algorithms. |
| |
| This is one of the classic DC removal filters, adjusted to provide |
| sufficient bass rolloff to meet the above requirement to protect hybrids |
| from things that upset them. The difference between successive samples |
| produces a lousy HPF, and then a suitably placed pole flattens things out. |
| The final result is a nicely rolled off bass end. The filtering is |
| implemented with extended fractional precision, which noise shapes things, |
| giving very clean DC removal. |
| */ |
| |
| int16_t oslec_hpf_tx(struct oslec_state *ec, int16_t tx) |
| { |
| int tmp; |
| int tmp1; |
| |
| if (ec->adaption_mode & ECHO_CAN_USE_TX_HPF) { |
| tmp = tx << 15; |
| |
| /* |
| * Make sure the gain of the HPF is 1.0. The first can still |
| * saturate a little under impulse conditions, and it might |
| * roll to 32768 and need clipping on sustained peak level |
| * signals. However, the scale of such clipping is small, and |
| * the error due to any saturation should not markedly affect |
| * the downstream processing. |
| */ |
| tmp -= (tmp >> 4); |
| |
| ec->tx_1 += -(ec->tx_1 >> DC_LOG2BETA) + tmp - ec->tx_2; |
| tmp1 = ec->tx_1 >> 15; |
| if (tmp1 > 32767) |
| tmp1 = 32767; |
| if (tmp1 < -32767) |
| tmp1 = -32767; |
| tx = tmp1; |
| ec->tx_2 = tmp; |
| } |
| |
| return tx; |
| } |
| EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oslec_hpf_tx); |
| |
| MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); |
| MODULE_AUTHOR("David Rowe"); |
| MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Open Source Line Echo Canceller"); |
| MODULE_VERSION("0.3.0"); |