| =========== |
| SNMP counter |
| =========== |
| |
| This document explains the meaning of SNMP counters. |
| |
| General IPv4 counters |
| ==================== |
| All layer 4 packets and ICMP packets will change these counters, but |
| these counters won't be changed by layer 2 packets (such as STP) or |
| ARP packets. |
| |
| * IpInReceives |
| Defined in `RFC1213 ipInReceives`_ |
| |
| .. _RFC1213 ipInReceives: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-26 |
| |
| The number of packets received by the IP layer. It gets increasing at the |
| beginning of ip_rcv function, always be updated together with |
| IpExtInOctets. It will be increased even if the packet is dropped |
| later (e.g. due to the IP header is invalid or the checksum is wrong |
| and so on). It indicates the number of aggregated segments after |
| GRO/LRO. |
| |
| * IpInDelivers |
| Defined in `RFC1213 ipInDelivers`_ |
| |
| .. _RFC1213 ipInDelivers: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-28 |
| |
| The number of packets delivers to the upper layer protocols. E.g. TCP, UDP, |
| ICMP and so on. If no one listens on a raw socket, only kernel |
| supported protocols will be delivered, if someone listens on the raw |
| socket, all valid IP packets will be delivered. |
| |
| * IpOutRequests |
| Defined in `RFC1213 ipOutRequests`_ |
| |
| .. _RFC1213 ipOutRequests: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-28 |
| |
| The number of packets sent via IP layer, for both single cast and |
| multicast packets, and would always be updated together with |
| IpExtOutOctets. |
| |
| * IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets |
| They are Linux kernel extensions, no RFC definitions. Please note, |
| RFC1213 indeed defines ifInOctets and ifOutOctets, but they |
| are different things. The ifInOctets and ifOutOctets include the MAC |
| layer header size but IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets don't, they |
| only include the IP layer header and the IP layer data. |
| |
| * IpExtInNoECTPkts, IpExtInECT1Pkts, IpExtInECT0Pkts, IpExtInCEPkts |
| They indicate the number of four kinds of ECN IP packets, please refer |
| `Explicit Congestion Notification`_ for more details. |
| |
| .. _Explicit Congestion Notification: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3168#page-6 |
| |
| These 4 counters calculate how many packets received per ECN |
| status. They count the real frame number regardless the LRO/GRO. So |
| for the same packet, you might find that IpInReceives count 1, but |
| IpExtInNoECTPkts counts 2 or more. |
| |
| * IpInHdrErrors |
| Defined in `RFC1213 ipInHdrErrors`_. It indicates the packet is |
| dropped due to the IP header error. It might happen in both IP input |
| and IP forward paths. |
| |
| .. _RFC1213 ipInHdrErrors: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-27 |
| |
| * IpInAddrErrors |
| Defined in `RFC1213 ipInAddrErrors`_. It will be increased in two |
| scenarios: (1) The IP address is invalid. (2) The destination IP |
| address is not a local address and IP forwarding is not enabled |
| |
| .. _RFC1213 ipInAddrErrors: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-27 |
| |
| * IpExtInNoRoutes |
| This counter means the packet is dropped when the IP stack receives a |
| packet and can't find a route for it from the route table. It might |
| happen when IP forwarding is enabled and the destination IP address is |
| not a local address and there is no route for the destination IP |
| address. |
| |
| * IpInUnknownProtos |
| Defined in `RFC1213 ipInUnknownProtos`_. It will be increased if the |
| layer 4 protocol is unsupported by kernel. If an application is using |
| raw socket, kernel will always deliver the packet to the raw socket |
| and this counter won't be increased. |
| |
| .. _RFC1213 ipInUnknownProtos: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-27 |
| |
| * IpExtInTruncatedPkts |
| For IPv4 packet, it means the actual data size is smaller than the |
| "Total Length" field in the IPv4 header. |
| |
| * IpInDiscards |
| Defined in `RFC1213 ipInDiscards`_. It indicates the packet is dropped |
| in the IP receiving path and due to kernel internal reasons (e.g. no |
| enough memory). |
| |
| .. _RFC1213 ipInDiscards: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-28 |
| |
| * IpOutDiscards |
| Defined in `RFC1213 ipOutDiscards`_. It indicates the packet is |
| dropped in the IP sending path and due to kernel internal reasons. |
| |
| .. _RFC1213 ipOutDiscards: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-28 |
| |
| * IpOutNoRoutes |
| Defined in `RFC1213 ipOutNoRoutes`_. It indicates the packet is |
| dropped in the IP sending path and no route is found for it. |
| |
| .. _RFC1213 ipOutNoRoutes: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-29 |
| |
| ICMP counters |
| ============ |
| * IcmpInMsgs and IcmpOutMsgs |
| Defined by `RFC1213 icmpInMsgs`_ and `RFC1213 icmpOutMsgs`_ |
| |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpInMsgs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-41 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpOutMsgs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-43 |
| |
| As mentioned in the RFC1213, these two counters include errors, they |
| would be increased even if the ICMP packet has an invalid type. The |
| ICMP output path will check the header of a raw socket, so the |
| IcmpOutMsgs would still be updated if the IP header is constructed by |
| a userspace program. |
| |
| * ICMP named types |
| | These counters include most of common ICMP types, they are: |
| | IcmpInDestUnreachs: `RFC1213 icmpInDestUnreachs`_ |
| | IcmpInTimeExcds: `RFC1213 icmpInTimeExcds`_ |
| | IcmpInParmProbs: `RFC1213 icmpInParmProbs`_ |
| | IcmpInSrcQuenchs: `RFC1213 icmpInSrcQuenchs`_ |
| | IcmpInRedirects: `RFC1213 icmpInRedirects`_ |
| | IcmpInEchos: `RFC1213 icmpInEchos`_ |
| | IcmpInEchoReps: `RFC1213 icmpInEchoReps`_ |
| | IcmpInTimestamps: `RFC1213 icmpInTimestamps`_ |
| | IcmpInTimestampReps: `RFC1213 icmpInTimestampReps`_ |
| | IcmpInAddrMasks: `RFC1213 icmpInAddrMasks`_ |
| | IcmpInAddrMaskReps: `RFC1213 icmpInAddrMaskReps`_ |
| | IcmpOutDestUnreachs: `RFC1213 icmpOutDestUnreachs`_ |
| | IcmpOutTimeExcds: `RFC1213 icmpOutTimeExcds`_ |
| | IcmpOutParmProbs: `RFC1213 icmpOutParmProbs`_ |
| | IcmpOutSrcQuenchs: `RFC1213 icmpOutSrcQuenchs`_ |
| | IcmpOutRedirects: `RFC1213 icmpOutRedirects`_ |
| | IcmpOutEchos: `RFC1213 icmpOutEchos`_ |
| | IcmpOutEchoReps: `RFC1213 icmpOutEchoReps`_ |
| | IcmpOutTimestamps: `RFC1213 icmpOutTimestamps`_ |
| | IcmpOutTimestampReps: `RFC1213 icmpOutTimestampReps`_ |
| | IcmpOutAddrMasks: `RFC1213 icmpOutAddrMasks`_ |
| | IcmpOutAddrMaskReps: `RFC1213 icmpOutAddrMaskReps`_ |
| |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpInDestUnreachs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-41 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpInTimeExcds: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-41 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpInParmProbs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpInSrcQuenchs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpInRedirects: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpInEchos: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpInEchoReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpInTimestamps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpInTimestampReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-43 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpInAddrMasks: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-43 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpInAddrMaskReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-43 |
| |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpOutDestUnreachs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-44 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpOutTimeExcds: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-44 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpOutParmProbs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-44 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpOutSrcQuenchs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-44 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpOutRedirects: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-44 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpOutEchos: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-45 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpOutEchoReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-45 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpOutTimestamps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-45 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpOutTimestampReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-45 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpOutAddrMasks: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-45 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpOutAddrMaskReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-46 |
| |
| Every ICMP type has two counters: 'In' and 'Out'. E.g., for the ICMP |
| Echo packet, they are IcmpInEchos and IcmpOutEchos. Their meanings are |
| straightforward. The 'In' counter means kernel receives such a packet |
| and the 'Out' counter means kernel sends such a packet. |
| |
| * ICMP numeric types |
| They are IcmpMsgInType[N] and IcmpMsgOutType[N], the [N] indicates the |
| ICMP type number. These counters track all kinds of ICMP packets. The |
| ICMP type number definition could be found in the `ICMP parameters`_ |
| document. |
| |
| .. _ICMP parameters: https://www.iana.org/assignments/icmp-parameters/icmp-parameters.xhtml |
| |
| For example, if the Linux kernel sends an ICMP Echo packet, the |
| IcmpMsgOutType8 would increase 1. And if kernel gets an ICMP Echo Reply |
| packet, IcmpMsgInType0 would increase 1. |
| |
| * IcmpInCsumErrors |
| This counter indicates the checksum of the ICMP packet is |
| wrong. Kernel verifies the checksum after updating the IcmpInMsgs and |
| before updating IcmpMsgInType[N]. If a packet has bad checksum, the |
| IcmpInMsgs would be updated but none of IcmpMsgInType[N] would be updated. |
| |
| * IcmpInErrors and IcmpOutErrors |
| Defined by `RFC1213 icmpInErrors`_ and `RFC1213 icmpOutErrors`_ |
| |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpInErrors: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-41 |
| .. _RFC1213 icmpOutErrors: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-43 |
| |
| When an error occurs in the ICMP packet handler path, these two |
| counters would be updated. The receiving packet path use IcmpInErrors |
| and the sending packet path use IcmpOutErrors. When IcmpInCsumErrors |
| is increased, IcmpInErrors would always be increased too. |
| |
| relationship of the ICMP counters |
| ------------------------------- |
| The sum of IcmpMsgOutType[N] is always equal to IcmpOutMsgs, as they |
| are updated at the same time. The sum of IcmpMsgInType[N] plus |
| IcmpInErrors should be equal or larger than IcmpInMsgs. When kernel |
| receives an ICMP packet, kernel follows below logic: |
| |
| 1. increase IcmpInMsgs |
| 2. if has any error, update IcmpInErrors and finish the process |
| 3. update IcmpMsgOutType[N] |
| 4. handle the packet depending on the type, if has any error, update |
| IcmpInErrors and finish the process |
| |
| So if all errors occur in step (2), IcmpInMsgs should be equal to the |
| sum of IcmpMsgOutType[N] plus IcmpInErrors. If all errors occur in |
| step (4), IcmpInMsgs should be equal to the sum of |
| IcmpMsgOutType[N]. If the errors occur in both step (2) and step (4), |
| IcmpInMsgs should be less than the sum of IcmpMsgOutType[N] plus |
| IcmpInErrors. |
| |
| General TCP counters |
| ================== |
| * TcpInSegs |
| Defined in `RFC1213 tcpInSegs`_ |
| |
| .. _RFC1213 tcpInSegs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-48 |
| |
| The number of packets received by the TCP layer. As mentioned in |
| RFC1213, it includes the packets received in error, such as checksum |
| error, invalid TCP header and so on. Only one error won't be included: |
| if the layer 2 destination address is not the NIC's layer 2 |
| address. It might happen if the packet is a multicast or broadcast |
| packet, or the NIC is in promiscuous mode. In these situations, the |
| packets would be delivered to the TCP layer, but the TCP layer will discard |
| these packets before increasing TcpInSegs. The TcpInSegs counter |
| isn't aware of GRO. So if two packets are merged by GRO, the TcpInSegs |
| counter would only increase 1. |
| |
| * TcpOutSegs |
| Defined in `RFC1213 tcpOutSegs`_ |
| |
| .. _RFC1213 tcpOutSegs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-48 |
| |
| The number of packets sent by the TCP layer. As mentioned in RFC1213, |
| it excludes the retransmitted packets. But it includes the SYN, ACK |
| and RST packets. Doesn't like TcpInSegs, the TcpOutSegs is aware of |
| GSO, so if a packet would be split to 2 by GSO, TcpOutSegs will |
| increase 2. |
| |
| * TcpActiveOpens |
| Defined in `RFC1213 tcpActiveOpens`_ |
| |
| .. _RFC1213 tcpActiveOpens: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-47 |
| |
| It means the TCP layer sends a SYN, and come into the SYN-SENT |
| state. Every time TcpActiveOpens increases 1, TcpOutSegs should always |
| increase 1. |
| |
| * TcpPassiveOpens |
| Defined in `RFC1213 tcpPassiveOpens`_ |
| |
| .. _RFC1213 tcpPassiveOpens: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-47 |
| |
| It means the TCP layer receives a SYN, replies a SYN+ACK, come into |
| the SYN-RCVD state. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPRcvCoalesce |
| When packets are received by the TCP layer and are not be read by the |
| application, the TCP layer will try to merge them. This counter |
| indicate how many packets are merged in such situation. If GRO is |
| enabled, lots of packets would be merged by GRO, these packets |
| wouldn't be counted to TcpExtTCPRcvCoalesce. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPAutoCorking |
| When sending packets, the TCP layer will try to merge small packets to |
| a bigger one. This counter increase 1 for every packet merged in such |
| situation. Please refer to the LWN article for more details: |
| https://lwn.net/Articles/576263/ |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPOrigDataSent |
| This counter is explained by `kernel commit f19c29e3e391`_, I pasted the |
| explaination below:: |
| |
| TCPOrigDataSent: number of outgoing packets with original data (excluding |
| retransmission but including data-in-SYN). This counter is different from |
| TcpOutSegs because TcpOutSegs also tracks pure ACKs. TCPOrigDataSent is |
| more useful to track the TCP retransmission rate. |
| |
| * TCPSynRetrans |
| This counter is explained by `kernel commit f19c29e3e391`_, I pasted the |
| explaination below:: |
| |
| TCPSynRetrans: number of SYN and SYN/ACK retransmits to break down |
| retransmissions into SYN, fast-retransmits, timeout retransmits, etc. |
| |
| * TCPFastOpenActiveFail |
| This counter is explained by `kernel commit f19c29e3e391`_, I pasted the |
| explaination below:: |
| |
| TCPFastOpenActiveFail: Fast Open attempts (SYN/data) failed because |
| the remote does not accept it or the attempts timed out. |
| |
| .. _kernel commit f19c29e3e391: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=f19c29e3e391a66a273e9afebaf01917245148cd |
| |
| * TcpExtListenOverflows and TcpExtListenDrops |
| When kernel receives a SYN from a client, and if the TCP accept queue |
| is full, kernel will drop the SYN and add 1 to TcpExtListenOverflows. |
| At the same time kernel will also add 1 to TcpExtListenDrops. When a |
| TCP socket is in LISTEN state, and kernel need to drop a packet, |
| kernel would always add 1 to TcpExtListenDrops. So increase |
| TcpExtListenOverflows would let TcpExtListenDrops increasing at the |
| same time, but TcpExtListenDrops would also increase without |
| TcpExtListenOverflows increasing, e.g. a memory allocation fail would |
| also let TcpExtListenDrops increase. |
| |
| Note: The above explanation is based on kernel 4.10 or above version, on |
| an old kernel, the TCP stack has different behavior when TCP accept |
| queue is full. On the old kernel, TCP stack won't drop the SYN, it |
| would complete the 3-way handshake. As the accept queue is full, TCP |
| stack will keep the socket in the TCP half-open queue. As it is in the |
| half open queue, TCP stack will send SYN+ACK on an exponential backoff |
| timer, after client replies ACK, TCP stack checks whether the accept |
| queue is still full, if it is not full, moves the socket to the accept |
| queue, if it is full, keeps the socket in the half-open queue, at next |
| time client replies ACK, this socket will get another chance to move |
| to the accept queue. |
| |
| |
| * TcpEstabResets |
| Defined in `RFC1213 tcpEstabResets`_. |
| |
| .. _RFC1213 tcpEstabResets: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-48 |
| |
| * TcpAttemptFails |
| Defined in `RFC1213 tcpAttemptFails`_. |
| |
| .. _RFC1213 tcpAttemptFails: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-48 |
| |
| * TcpOutRsts |
| Defined in `RFC1213 tcpOutRsts`_. The RFC says this counter indicates |
| the 'segments sent containing the RST flag', but in linux kernel, this |
| couner indicates the segments kerenl tried to send. The sending |
| process might be failed due to some errors (e.g. memory alloc failed). |
| |
| .. _RFC1213 tcpOutRsts: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-52 |
| |
| |
| TCP Fast Path |
| ============ |
| When kernel receives a TCP packet, it has two paths to handler the |
| packet, one is fast path, another is slow path. The comment in kernel |
| code provides a good explanation of them, I pasted them below:: |
| |
| It is split into a fast path and a slow path. The fast path is |
| disabled when: |
| |
| - A zero window was announced from us |
| - zero window probing |
| is only handled properly on the slow path. |
| - Out of order segments arrived. |
| - Urgent data is expected. |
| - There is no buffer space left |
| - Unexpected TCP flags/window values/header lengths are received |
| (detected by checking the TCP header against pred_flags) |
| - Data is sent in both directions. The fast path only supports pure senders |
| or pure receivers (this means either the sequence number or the ack |
| value must stay constant) |
| - Unexpected TCP option. |
| |
| Kernel will try to use fast path unless any of the above conditions |
| are satisfied. If the packets are out of order, kernel will handle |
| them in slow path, which means the performance might be not very |
| good. Kernel would also come into slow path if the "Delayed ack" is |
| used, because when using "Delayed ack", the data is sent in both |
| directions. When the TCP window scale option is not used, kernel will |
| try to enable fast path immediately when the connection comes into the |
| established state, but if the TCP window scale option is used, kernel |
| will disable the fast path at first, and try to enable it after kernel |
| receives packets. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPPureAcks and TcpExtTCPHPAcks |
| If a packet set ACK flag and has no data, it is a pure ACK packet, if |
| kernel handles it in the fast path, TcpExtTCPHPAcks will increase 1, |
| if kernel handles it in the slow path, TcpExtTCPPureAcks will |
| increase 1. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPHPHits |
| If a TCP packet has data (which means it is not a pure ACK packet), |
| and this packet is handled in the fast path, TcpExtTCPHPHits will |
| increase 1. |
| |
| |
| TCP abort |
| ======== |
| * TcpExtTCPAbortOnData |
| It means TCP layer has data in flight, but need to close the |
| connection. So TCP layer sends a RST to the other side, indicate the |
| connection is not closed very graceful. An easy way to increase this |
| counter is using the SO_LINGER option. Please refer to the SO_LINGER |
| section of the `socket man page`_: |
| |
| .. _socket man page: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/socket.7.html |
| |
| By default, when an application closes a connection, the close function |
| will return immediately and kernel will try to send the in-flight data |
| async. If you use the SO_LINGER option, set l_onoff to 1, and l_linger |
| to a positive number, the close function won't return immediately, but |
| wait for the in-flight data are acked by the other side, the max wait |
| time is l_linger seconds. If set l_onoff to 1 and set l_linger to 0, |
| when the application closes a connection, kernel will send a RST |
| immediately and increase the TcpExtTCPAbortOnData counter. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose |
| This counter means the application has unread data in the TCP layer when |
| the application wants to close the TCP connection. In such a situation, |
| kernel will send a RST to the other side of the TCP connection. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory |
| When an application closes a TCP connection, kernel still need to track |
| the connection, let it complete the TCP disconnect process. E.g. an |
| app calls the close method of a socket, kernel sends fin to the other |
| side of the connection, then the app has no relationship with the |
| socket any more, but kernel need to keep the socket, this socket |
| becomes an orphan socket, kernel waits for the reply of the other side, |
| and would come to the TIME_WAIT state finally. When kernel has no |
| enough memory to keep the orphan socket, kernel would send an RST to |
| the other side, and delete the socket, in such situation, kernel will |
| increase 1 to the TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory. Two conditions would trigger |
| TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory: |
| |
| 1. the memory used by the TCP protocol is higher than the third value of |
| the tcp_mem. Please refer the tcp_mem section in the `TCP man page`_: |
| |
| .. _TCP man page: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/tcp.7.html |
| |
| 2. the orphan socket count is higher than net.ipv4.tcp_max_orphans |
| |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPAbortOnTimeout |
| This counter will increase when any of the TCP timers expire. In such |
| situation, kernel won't send RST, just give up the connection. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPAbortOnLinger |
| When a TCP connection comes into FIN_WAIT_2 state, instead of waiting |
| for the fin packet from the other side, kernel could send a RST and |
| delete the socket immediately. This is not the default behavior of |
| Linux kernel TCP stack. By configuring the TCP_LINGER2 socket option, |
| you could let kernel follow this behavior. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPAbortFailed |
| The kernel TCP layer will send RST if the `RFC2525 2.17 section`_ is |
| satisfied. If an internal error occurs during this process, |
| TcpExtTCPAbortFailed will be increased. |
| |
| .. _RFC2525 2.17 section: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2525#page-50 |
| |
| TCP Hybrid Slow Start |
| ==================== |
| The Hybrid Slow Start algorithm is an enhancement of the traditional |
| TCP congestion window Slow Start algorithm. It uses two pieces of |
| information to detect whether the max bandwidth of the TCP path is |
| approached. The two pieces of information are ACK train length and |
| increase in packet delay. For detail information, please refer the |
| `Hybrid Slow Start paper`_. Either ACK train length or packet delay |
| hits a specific threshold, the congestion control algorithm will come |
| into the Congestion Avoidance state. Until v4.20, two congestion |
| control algorithms are using Hybrid Slow Start, they are cubic (the |
| default congestion control algorithm) and cdg. Four snmp counters |
| relate with the Hybrid Slow Start algorithm. |
| |
| .. _Hybrid Slow Start paper: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/25e9/ef3f03315782c7f1cbcd31b587857adae7d1.pdf |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPHystartTrainDetect |
| How many times the ACK train length threshold is detected |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPHystartTrainCwnd |
| The sum of CWND detected by ACK train length. Dividing this value by |
| TcpExtTCPHystartTrainDetect is the average CWND which detected by the |
| ACK train length. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPHystartDelayDetect |
| How many times the packet delay threshold is detected. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPHystartDelayCwnd |
| The sum of CWND detected by packet delay. Dividing this value by |
| TcpExtTCPHystartDelayDetect is the average CWND which detected by the |
| packet delay. |
| |
| TCP retransmission and congestion control |
| ====================================== |
| The TCP protocol has two retransmission mechanisms: SACK and fast |
| recovery. They are exclusive with each other. When SACK is enabled, |
| the kernel TCP stack would use SACK, or kernel would use fast |
| recovery. The SACK is a TCP option, which is defined in `RFC2018`_, |
| the fast recovery is defined in `RFC6582`_, which is also called |
| 'Reno'. |
| |
| The TCP congestion control is a big and complex topic. To understand |
| the related snmp counter, we need to know the states of the congestion |
| control state machine. There are 5 states: Open, Disorder, CWR, |
| Recovery and Loss. For details about these states, please refer page 5 |
| and page 6 of this document: |
| https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0e9c/968d09ab2e53e24c4dca5b2d67c7f7140f8e.pdf |
| |
| .. _RFC2018: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2018 |
| .. _RFC6582: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6582 |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPRenoRecovery and TcpExtTCPSackRecovery |
| When the congestion control comes into Recovery state, if sack is |
| used, TcpExtTCPSackRecovery increases 1, if sack is not used, |
| TcpExtTCPRenoRecovery increases 1. These two counters mean the TCP |
| stack begins to retransmit the lost packets. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPSACKReneging |
| A packet was acknowledged by SACK, but the receiver has dropped this |
| packet, so the sender needs to retransmit this packet. In this |
| situation, the sender adds 1 to TcpExtTCPSACKReneging. A receiver |
| could drop a packet which has been acknowledged by SACK, although it is |
| unusual, it is allowed by the TCP protocol. The sender doesn't really |
| know what happened on the receiver side. The sender just waits until |
| the RTO expires for this packet, then the sender assumes this packet |
| has been dropped by the receiver. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPRenoReorder |
| The reorder packet is detected by fast recovery. It would only be used |
| if SACK is disabled. The fast recovery algorithm detects recorder by |
| the duplicate ACK number. E.g., if retransmission is triggered, and |
| the original retransmitted packet is not lost, it is just out of |
| order, the receiver would acknowledge multiple times, one for the |
| retransmitted packet, another for the arriving of the original out of |
| order packet. Thus the sender would find more ACks than its |
| expectation, and the sender knows out of order occurs. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPTSReorder |
| The reorder packet is detected when a hole is filled. E.g., assume the |
| sender sends packet 1,2,3,4,5, and the receiving order is |
| 1,2,4,5,3. When the sender receives the ACK of packet 3 (which will |
| fill the hole), two conditions will let TcpExtTCPTSReorder increase |
| 1: (1) if the packet 3 is not re-retransmitted yet. (2) if the packet |
| 3 is retransmitted but the timestamp of the packet 3's ACK is earlier |
| than the retransmission timestamp. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPSACKReorder |
| The reorder packet detected by SACK. The SACK has two methods to |
| detect reorder: (1) DSACK is received by the sender. It means the |
| sender sends the same packet more than one times. And the only reason |
| is the sender believes an out of order packet is lost so it sends the |
| packet again. (2) Assume packet 1,2,3,4,5 are sent by the sender, and |
| the sender has received SACKs for packet 2 and 5, now the sender |
| receives SACK for packet 4 and the sender doesn't retransmit the |
| packet yet, the sender would know packet 4 is out of order. The TCP |
| stack of kernel will increase TcpExtTCPSACKReorder for both of the |
| above scenarios. |
| |
| DSACK |
| ===== |
| The DSACK is defined in `RFC2883`_. The receiver uses DSACK to report |
| duplicate packets to the sender. There are two kinds of |
| duplications: (1) a packet which has been acknowledged is |
| duplicate. (2) an out of order packet is duplicate. The TCP stack |
| counts these two kinds of duplications on both receiver side and |
| sender side. |
| |
| .. _RFC2883 : https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2883 |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPDSACKOldSent |
| The TCP stack receives a duplicate packet which has been acked, so it |
| sends a DSACK to the sender. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPDSACKOfoSent |
| The TCP stack receives an out of order duplicate packet, so it sends a |
| DSACK to the sender. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPDSACKRecv |
| The TCP stack receives a DSACK, which indicates an acknowledged |
| duplicate packet is received. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPDSACKOfoRecv |
| The TCP stack receives a DSACK, which indicate an out of order |
| duplicate packet is received. |
| |
| invalid SACK and DSACK |
| ==================== |
| When a SACK (or DSACK) block is invalid, a corresponding counter would |
| be updated. The validation method is base on the start/end sequence |
| number of the SACK block. For more details, please refer the comment |
| of the function tcp_is_sackblock_valid in the kernel source code. A |
| SACK option could have up to 4 blocks, they are checked |
| individually. E.g., if 3 blocks of a SACk is invalid, the |
| corresponding counter would be updated 3 times. The comment of the |
| `Add counters for discarded SACK blocks`_ patch has additional |
| explaination: |
| |
| .. _Add counters for discarded SACK blocks: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=18f02545a9a16c9a89778b91a162ad16d510bb32 |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPSACKDiscard |
| This counter indicates how many SACK blocks are invalid. If the invalid |
| SACK block is caused by ACK recording, the TCP stack will only ignore |
| it and won't update this counter. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPDSACKIgnoredOld and TcpExtTCPDSACKIgnoredNoUndo |
| When a DSACK block is invalid, one of these two counters would be |
| updated. Which counter will be updated depends on the undo_marker flag |
| of the TCP socket. If the undo_marker is not set, the TCP stack isn't |
| likely to re-transmit any packets, and we still receive an invalid |
| DSACK block, the reason might be that the packet is duplicated in the |
| middle of the network. In such scenario, TcpExtTCPDSACKIgnoredNoUndo |
| will be updated. If the undo_marker is set, TcpExtTCPDSACKIgnoredOld |
| will be updated. As implied in its name, it might be an old packet. |
| |
| SACK shift |
| ========= |
| The linux networking stack stores data in sk_buff struct (skb for |
| short). If a SACK block acrosses multiple skb, the TCP stack will try |
| to re-arrange data in these skb. E.g. if a SACK block acknowledges seq |
| 10 to 15, skb1 has seq 10 to 13, skb2 has seq 14 to 20. The seq 14 and |
| 15 in skb2 would be moved to skb1. This operation is 'shift'. If a |
| SACK block acknowledges seq 10 to 20, skb1 has seq 10 to 13, skb2 has |
| seq 14 to 20. All data in skb2 will be moved to skb1, and skb2 will be |
| discard, this operation is 'merge'. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPSackShifted |
| A skb is shifted |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPSackMerged |
| A skb is merged |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPSackShiftFallback |
| A skb should be shifted or merged, but the TCP stack doesn't do it for |
| some reasons. |
| |
| TCP out of order |
| =============== |
| * TcpExtTCPOFOQueue |
| The TCP layer receives an out of order packet and has enough memory |
| to queue it. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPOFODrop |
| The TCP layer receives an out of order packet but doesn't have enough |
| memory, so drops it. Such packets won't be counted into |
| TcpExtTCPOFOQueue. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPOFOMerge |
| The received out of order packet has an overlay with the previous |
| packet. the overlay part will be dropped. All of TcpExtTCPOFOMerge |
| packets will also be counted into TcpExtTCPOFOQueue. |
| |
| TCP PAWS |
| ======= |
| PAWS (Protection Against Wrapped Sequence numbers) is an algorithm |
| which is used to drop old packets. It depends on the TCP |
| timestamps. For detail information, please refer the `timestamp wiki`_ |
| and the `RFC of PAWS`_. |
| |
| .. _RFC of PAWS: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1323#page-17 |
| .. _timestamp wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_Control_Protocol#TCP_timestamps |
| |
| * TcpExtPAWSActive |
| Packets are dropped by PAWS in Syn-Sent status. |
| |
| * TcpExtPAWSEstab |
| Packets are dropped by PAWS in any status other than Syn-Sent. |
| |
| TCP ACK skip |
| =========== |
| In some scenarios, kernel would avoid sending duplicate ACKs too |
| frequently. Please find more details in the tcp_invalid_ratelimit |
| section of the `sysctl document`_. When kernel decides to skip an ACK |
| due to tcp_invalid_ratelimit, kernel would update one of below |
| counters to indicate the ACK is skipped in which scenario. The ACK |
| would only be skipped if the received packet is either a SYN packet or |
| it has no data. |
| |
| .. _sysctl document: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv |
| The ACK is skipped in Syn-Recv status. The Syn-Recv status means the |
| TCP stack receives a SYN and replies SYN+ACK. Now the TCP stack is |
| waiting for an ACK. Generally, the TCP stack doesn't need to send ACK |
| in the Syn-Recv status. But in several scenarios, the TCP stack need |
| to send an ACK. E.g., the TCP stack receives the same SYN packet |
| repeately, the received packet does not pass the PAWS check, or the |
| received packet sequence number is out of window. In these scenarios, |
| the TCP stack needs to send ACK. If the ACk sending frequency is higher than |
| tcp_invalid_ratelimit allows, the TCP stack will skip sending ACK and |
| increase TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv. |
| |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPACKSkippedPAWS |
| The ACK is skipped due to PAWS (Protect Against Wrapped Sequence |
| numbers) check fails. If the PAWS check fails in Syn-Recv, Fin-Wait-2 |
| or Time-Wait statuses, the skipped ACK would be counted to |
| TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv, TcpExtTCPACKSkippedFinWait2 or |
| TcpExtTCPACKSkippedTimeWait. In all other statuses, the skipped ACK |
| would be counted to TcpExtTCPACKSkippedPAWS. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSeq |
| The sequence number is out of window and the timestamp passes the PAWS |
| check and the TCP status is not Syn-Recv, Fin-Wait-2, and Time-Wait. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPACKSkippedFinWait2 |
| The ACK is skipped in Fin-Wait-2 status, the reason would be either |
| PAWS check fails or the received sequence number is out of window. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPACKSkippedTimeWait |
| Tha ACK is skipped in Time-Wait status, the reason would be either |
| PAWS check failed or the received sequence number is out of window. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPACKSkippedChallenge |
| The ACK is skipped if the ACK is a challenge ACK. The RFC 5961 defines |
| 3 kind of challenge ACK, please refer `RFC 5961 section 3.2`_, |
| `RFC 5961 section 4.2`_ and `RFC 5961 section 5.2`_. Besides these |
| three scenarios, In some TCP status, the linux TCP stack would also |
| send challenge ACKs if the ACK number is before the first |
| unacknowledged number (more strict than `RFC 5961 section 5.2`_). |
| |
| .. _RFC 5961 section 3.2: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5961#page-7 |
| .. _RFC 5961 section 4.2: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5961#page-9 |
| .. _RFC 5961 section 5.2: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5961#page-11 |
| |
| TCP receive window |
| ================= |
| * TcpExtTCPWantZeroWindowAdv |
| Depending on current memory usage, the TCP stack tries to set receive |
| window to zero. But the receive window might still be a no-zero |
| value. For example, if the previous window size is 10, and the TCP |
| stack receives 3 bytes, the current window size would be 7 even if the |
| window size calculated by the memory usage is zero. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPToZeroWindowAdv |
| The TCP receive window is set to zero from a no-zero value. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPFromZeroWindowAdv |
| The TCP receive window is set to no-zero value from zero. |
| |
| |
| Delayed ACK |
| ========== |
| The TCP Delayed ACK is a technique which is used for reducing the |
| packet count in the network. For more details, please refer the |
| `Delayed ACK wiki`_ |
| |
| .. _Delayed ACK wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCP_delayed_acknowledgment |
| |
| * TcpExtDelayedACKs |
| A delayed ACK timer expires. The TCP stack will send a pure ACK packet |
| and exit the delayed ACK mode. |
| |
| * TcpExtDelayedACKLocked |
| A delayed ACK timer expires, but the TCP stack can't send an ACK |
| immediately due to the socket is locked by a userspace program. The |
| TCP stack will send a pure ACK later (after the userspace program |
| unlock the socket). When the TCP stack sends the pure ACK later, the |
| TCP stack will also update TcpExtDelayedACKs and exit the delayed ACK |
| mode. |
| |
| * TcpExtDelayedACKLost |
| It will be updated when the TCP stack receives a packet which has been |
| ACKed. A Delayed ACK loss might cause this issue, but it would also be |
| triggered by other reasons, such as a packet is duplicated in the |
| network. |
| |
| Tail Loss Probe (TLP) |
| =================== |
| TLP is an algorithm which is used to detect TCP packet loss. For more |
| details, please refer the `TLP paper`_. |
| |
| .. _TLP paper: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dukkipati-tcpm-tcp-loss-probe-01 |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPLossProbes |
| A TLP probe packet is sent. |
| |
| * TcpExtTCPLossProbeRecovery |
| A packet loss is detected and recovered by TLP. |
| |
| examples |
| ======= |
| |
| ping test |
| -------- |
| Run the ping command against the public dns server 8.8.8.8:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ ping 8.8.8.8 -c 1 |
| PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data. |
| 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=119 time=17.8 ms |
| |
| --- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics --- |
| 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms |
| rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 17.875/17.875/17.875/0.000 ms |
| |
| The nstayt result:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat |
| #kernel |
| IpInReceives 1 0.0 |
| IpInDelivers 1 0.0 |
| IpOutRequests 1 0.0 |
| IcmpInMsgs 1 0.0 |
| IcmpInEchoReps 1 0.0 |
| IcmpOutMsgs 1 0.0 |
| IcmpOutEchos 1 0.0 |
| IcmpMsgInType0 1 0.0 |
| IcmpMsgOutType8 1 0.0 |
| IpExtInOctets 84 0.0 |
| IpExtOutOctets 84 0.0 |
| IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0 |
| |
| The Linux server sent an ICMP Echo packet, so IpOutRequests, |
| IcmpOutMsgs, IcmpOutEchos and IcmpMsgOutType8 were increased 1. The |
| server got ICMP Echo Reply from 8.8.8.8, so IpInReceives, IcmpInMsgs, |
| IcmpInEchoReps and IcmpMsgInType0 were increased 1. The ICMP Echo Reply |
| was passed to the ICMP layer via IP layer, so IpInDelivers was |
| increased 1. The default ping data size is 48, so an ICMP Echo packet |
| and its corresponding Echo Reply packet are constructed by: |
| |
| * 14 bytes MAC header |
| * 20 bytes IP header |
| * 16 bytes ICMP header |
| * 48 bytes data (default value of the ping command) |
| |
| So the IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets are 20+16+48=84. |
| |
| tcp 3-way handshake |
| ------------------ |
| On server side, we run:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lknv 0.0.0.0 9000 |
| Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) |
| |
| On client side, we run:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -nv 192.168.122.251 9000 |
| Connection to 192.168.122.251 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| |
| The server listened on tcp 9000 port, the client connected to it, they |
| completed the 3-way handshake. |
| |
| On server side, we can find below nstat output:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i tcp |
| TcpPassiveOpens 1 0.0 |
| TcpInSegs 2 0.0 |
| TcpOutSegs 1 0.0 |
| TcpExtTCPPureAcks 1 0.0 |
| |
| On client side, we can find below nstat output:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i tcp |
| TcpActiveOpens 1 0.0 |
| TcpInSegs 1 0.0 |
| TcpOutSegs 2 0.0 |
| |
| When the server received the first SYN, it replied a SYN+ACK, and came into |
| SYN-RCVD state, so TcpPassiveOpens increased 1. The server received |
| SYN, sent SYN+ACK, received ACK, so server sent 1 packet, received 2 |
| packets, TcpInSegs increased 2, TcpOutSegs increased 1. The last ACK |
| of the 3-way handshake is a pure ACK without data, so |
| TcpExtTCPPureAcks increased 1. |
| |
| When the client sent SYN, the client came into the SYN-SENT state, so |
| TcpActiveOpens increased 1, the client sent SYN, received SYN+ACK, sent |
| ACK, so client sent 2 packets, received 1 packet, TcpInSegs increased |
| 1, TcpOutSegs increased 2. |
| |
| TCP normal traffic |
| ----------------- |
| Run nc on server:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 0.0.0.0 9000 |
| Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) |
| |
| Run nc on client:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 |
| Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| |
| Input a string in the nc client ('hello' in our example):: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 |
| Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| hello |
| |
| The client side nstat output:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat |
| #kernel |
| IpInReceives 1 0.0 |
| IpInDelivers 1 0.0 |
| IpOutRequests 1 0.0 |
| TcpInSegs 1 0.0 |
| TcpOutSegs 1 0.0 |
| TcpExtTCPPureAcks 1 0.0 |
| TcpExtTCPOrigDataSent 1 0.0 |
| IpExtInOctets 52 0.0 |
| IpExtOutOctets 58 0.0 |
| IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0 |
| |
| The server side nstat output:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat |
| #kernel |
| IpInReceives 1 0.0 |
| IpInDelivers 1 0.0 |
| IpOutRequests 1 0.0 |
| TcpInSegs 1 0.0 |
| TcpOutSegs 1 0.0 |
| IpExtInOctets 58 0.0 |
| IpExtOutOctets 52 0.0 |
| IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0 |
| |
| Input a string in nc client side again ('world' in our exmaple):: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 |
| Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| hello |
| world |
| |
| Client side nstat output:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat |
| #kernel |
| IpInReceives 1 0.0 |
| IpInDelivers 1 0.0 |
| IpOutRequests 1 0.0 |
| TcpInSegs 1 0.0 |
| TcpOutSegs 1 0.0 |
| TcpExtTCPHPAcks 1 0.0 |
| TcpExtTCPOrigDataSent 1 0.0 |
| IpExtInOctets 52 0.0 |
| IpExtOutOctets 58 0.0 |
| IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0 |
| |
| |
| Server side nstat output:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat |
| #kernel |
| IpInReceives 1 0.0 |
| IpInDelivers 1 0.0 |
| IpOutRequests 1 0.0 |
| TcpInSegs 1 0.0 |
| TcpOutSegs 1 0.0 |
| TcpExtTCPHPHits 1 0.0 |
| IpExtInOctets 58 0.0 |
| IpExtOutOctets 52 0.0 |
| IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0 |
| |
| Compare the first client-side nstat and the second client-side nstat, |
| we could find one difference: the first one had a 'TcpExtTCPPureAcks', |
| but the second one had a 'TcpExtTCPHPAcks'. The first server-side |
| nstat and the second server-side nstat had a difference too: the |
| second server-side nstat had a TcpExtTCPHPHits, but the first |
| server-side nstat didn't have it. The network traffic patterns were |
| exactly the same: the client sent a packet to the server, the server |
| replied an ACK. But kernel handled them in different ways. When the |
| TCP window scale option is not used, kernel will try to enable fast |
| path immediately when the connection comes into the established state, |
| but if the TCP window scale option is used, kernel will disable the |
| fast path at first, and try to enable it after kerenl receives |
| packets. We could use the 'ss' command to verify whether the window |
| scale option is used. e.g. run below command on either server or |
| client:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ ss -o state established -i '( dport = :9000 or sport = :9000 ) |
| Netid Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port |
| tcp 0 0 192.168.122.250:40654 192.168.122.251:9000 |
| ts sack cubic wscale:7,7 rto:204 rtt:0.98/0.49 mss:1448 pmtu:1500 rcvmss:536 advmss:1448 cwnd:10 bytes_acked:1 segs_out:2 segs_in:1 send 118.2Mbps lastsnd:46572 lastrcv:46572 lastack:46572 pacing_rate 236.4Mbps rcv_space:29200 rcv_ssthresh:29200 minrtt:0.98 |
| |
| The 'wscale:7,7' means both server and client set the window scale |
| option to 7. Now we could explain the nstat output in our test: |
| |
| In the first nstat output of client side, the client sent a packet, server |
| reply an ACK, when kernel handled this ACK, the fast path was not |
| enabled, so the ACK was counted into 'TcpExtTCPPureAcks'. |
| |
| In the second nstat output of client side, the client sent a packet again, |
| and received another ACK from the server, in this time, the fast path is |
| enabled, and the ACK was qualified for fast path, so it was handled by |
| the fast path, so this ACK was counted into TcpExtTCPHPAcks. |
| |
| In the first nstat output of server side, fast path was not enabled, |
| so there was no 'TcpExtTCPHPHits'. |
| |
| In the second nstat output of server side, the fast path was enabled, |
| and the packet received from client qualified for fast path, so it |
| was counted into 'TcpExtTCPHPHits'. |
| |
| TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose |
| -------------------- |
| On the server side, we run below python script:: |
| |
| import socket |
| import time |
| |
| port = 9000 |
| |
| s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port)) |
| s.listen(1) |
| sock, addr = s.accept() |
| while True: |
| time.sleep(9999999) |
| |
| This python script listen on 9000 port, but doesn't read anything from |
| the connection. |
| |
| On the client side, we send the string "hello" by nc:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ echo "hello" | nc nstat-b 9000 |
| |
| Then, we come back to the server side, the server has received the "hello" |
| packet, and the TCP layer has acked this packet, but the application didn't |
| read it yet. We type Ctrl-C to terminate the server script. Then we |
| could find TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose increased 1 on the server side:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i abort |
| TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose 1 0.0 |
| |
| If we run tcpdump on the server side, we could find the server sent a |
| RST after we type Ctrl-C. |
| |
| TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory and TcpExtTCPAbortOnTimeout |
| ----------------------------------------------- |
| Below is an example which let the orphan socket count be higher than |
| net.ipv4.tcp_max_orphans. |
| Change tcp_max_orphans to a smaller value on client:: |
| |
| sudo bash -c "echo 10 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_orphans" |
| |
| Client code (create 64 connection to server):: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ cat client_orphan.py |
| import socket |
| import time |
| |
| server = 'nstat-b' # server address |
| port = 9000 |
| |
| count = 64 |
| |
| connection_list = [] |
| |
| for i in range(64): |
| s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| s.connect((server, port)) |
| connection_list.append(s) |
| print("connection_count: %d" % len(connection_list)) |
| |
| while True: |
| time.sleep(99999) |
| |
| Server code (accept 64 connection from client):: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ cat server_orphan.py |
| import socket |
| import time |
| |
| port = 9000 |
| count = 64 |
| |
| s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port)) |
| s.listen(count) |
| connection_list = [] |
| while True: |
| sock, addr = s.accept() |
| connection_list.append((sock, addr)) |
| print("connection_count: %d" % len(connection_list)) |
| |
| Run the python scripts on server and client. |
| |
| On server:: |
| |
| python3 server_orphan.py |
| |
| On client:: |
| |
| python3 client_orphan.py |
| |
| Run iptables on server:: |
| |
| sudo iptables -A INPUT -i ens3 -p tcp --destination-port 9000 -j DROP |
| |
| Type Ctrl-C on client, stop client_orphan.py. |
| |
| Check TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory on client:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i abort |
| TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory 54 0.0 |
| |
| Check orphane socket count on client:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ ss -s |
| Total: 131 (kernel 0) |
| TCP: 14 (estab 1, closed 0, orphaned 10, synrecv 0, timewait 0/0), ports 0 |
| |
| Transport Total IP IPv6 |
| * 0 - - |
| RAW 1 0 1 |
| UDP 1 1 0 |
| TCP 14 13 1 |
| INET 16 14 2 |
| FRAG 0 0 0 |
| |
| The explanation of the test: after run server_orphan.py and |
| client_orphan.py, we set up 64 connections between server and |
| client. Run the iptables command, the server will drop all packets from |
| the client, type Ctrl-C on client_orphan.py, the system of the client |
| would try to close these connections, and before they are closed |
| gracefully, these connections became orphan sockets. As the iptables |
| of the server blocked packets from the client, the server won't receive fin |
| from the client, so all connection on clients would be stuck on FIN_WAIT_1 |
| stage, so they will keep as orphan sockets until timeout. We have echo |
| 10 to /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_orphans, so the client system would |
| only keep 10 orphan sockets, for all other orphan sockets, the client |
| system sent RST for them and delete them. We have 64 connections, so |
| the 'ss -s' command shows the system has 10 orphan sockets, and the |
| value of TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory was 54. |
| |
| An additional explanation about orphan socket count: You could find the |
| exactly orphan socket count by the 'ss -s' command, but when kernel |
| decide whither increases TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory and sends RST, kernel |
| doesn't always check the exactly orphan socket count. For increasing |
| performance, kernel checks an approximate count firstly, if the |
| approximate count is more than tcp_max_orphans, kernel checks the |
| exact count again. So if the approximate count is less than |
| tcp_max_orphans, but exactly count is more than tcp_max_orphans, you |
| would find TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory is not increased at all. If |
| tcp_max_orphans is large enough, it won't occur, but if you decrease |
| tcp_max_orphans to a small value like our test, you might find this |
| issue. So in our test, the client set up 64 connections although the |
| tcp_max_orphans is 10. If the client only set up 11 connections, we |
| can't find the change of TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory. |
| |
| Continue the previous test, we wait for several minutes. Because of the |
| iptables on the server blocked the traffic, the server wouldn't receive |
| fin, and all the client's orphan sockets would timeout on the |
| FIN_WAIT_1 state finally. So we wait for a few minutes, we could find |
| 10 timeout on the client:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i abort |
| TcpExtTCPAbortOnTimeout 10 0.0 |
| |
| TcpExtTCPAbortOnLinger |
| --------------------- |
| The server side code:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ cat server_linger.py |
| import socket |
| import time |
| |
| port = 9000 |
| |
| s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port)) |
| s.listen(1) |
| sock, addr = s.accept() |
| while True: |
| time.sleep(9999999) |
| |
| The client side code:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ cat client_linger.py |
| import socket |
| import struct |
| |
| server = 'nstat-b' # server address |
| port = 9000 |
| |
| s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_LINGER, struct.pack('ii', 1, 10)) |
| s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_TCP, socket.TCP_LINGER2, struct.pack('i', -1)) |
| s.connect((server, port)) |
| s.close() |
| |
| Run server_linger.py on server:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ python3 server_linger.py |
| |
| Run client_linger.py on client:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ python3 client_linger.py |
| |
| After run client_linger.py, check the output of nstat:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i abort |
| TcpExtTCPAbortOnLinger 1 0.0 |
| |
| TcpExtTCPRcvCoalesce |
| ------------------- |
| On the server, we run a program which listen on TCP port 9000, but |
| doesn't read any data:: |
| |
| import socket |
| import time |
| port = 9000 |
| s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port)) |
| s.listen(1) |
| sock, addr = s.accept() |
| while True: |
| time.sleep(9999999) |
| |
| Save the above code as server_coalesce.py, and run:: |
| |
| python3 server_coalesce.py |
| |
| On the client, save below code as client_coalesce.py:: |
| |
| import socket |
| server = 'nstat-b' |
| port = 9000 |
| s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) |
| s.connect((server, port)) |
| |
| Run:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ python3 -i client_coalesce.py |
| |
| We use '-i' to come into the interactive mode, then a packet:: |
| |
| >>> s.send(b'foo') |
| 3 |
| |
| Send a packet again:: |
| |
| >>> s.send(b'bar') |
| 3 |
| |
| On the server, run nstat:: |
| |
| ubuntu@nstat-b:~$ nstat |
| #kernel |
| IpInReceives 2 0.0 |
| IpInDelivers 2 0.0 |
| IpOutRequests 2 0.0 |
| TcpInSegs 2 0.0 |
| TcpOutSegs 2 0.0 |
| TcpExtTCPRcvCoalesce 1 0.0 |
| IpExtInOctets 110 0.0 |
| IpExtOutOctets 104 0.0 |
| IpExtInNoECTPkts 2 0.0 |
| |
| The client sent two packets, server didn't read any data. When |
| the second packet arrived at server, the first packet was still in |
| the receiving queue. So the TCP layer merged the two packets, and we |
| could find the TcpExtTCPRcvCoalesce increased 1. |
| |
| TcpExtListenOverflows and TcpExtListenDrops |
| ---------------------------------------- |
| On server, run the nc command, listen on port 9000:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 0.0.0.0 9000 |
| Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) |
| |
| On client, run 3 nc commands in different terminals:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 |
| Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| |
| The nc command only accepts 1 connection, and the accept queue length |
| is 1. On current linux implementation, set queue length to n means the |
| actual queue length is n+1. Now we create 3 connections, 1 is accepted |
| by nc, 2 in accepted queue, so the accept queue is full. |
| |
| Before running the 4th nc, we clean the nstat history on the server:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat -n |
| |
| Run the 4th nc on the client:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 |
| |
| If the nc server is running on kernel 4.10 or higher version, you |
| won't see the "Connection to ... succeeded!" string, because kernel |
| will drop the SYN if the accept queue is full. If the nc client is running |
| on an old kernel, you would see that the connection is succeeded, |
| because kernel would complete the 3 way handshake and keep the socket |
| on half open queue. I did the test on kernel 4.15. Below is the nstat |
| on the server:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat |
| #kernel |
| IpInReceives 4 0.0 |
| IpInDelivers 4 0.0 |
| TcpInSegs 4 0.0 |
| TcpExtListenOverflows 4 0.0 |
| TcpExtListenDrops 4 0.0 |
| IpExtInOctets 240 0.0 |
| IpExtInNoECTPkts 4 0.0 |
| |
| Both TcpExtListenOverflows and TcpExtListenDrops were 4. If the time |
| between the 4th nc and the nstat was longer, the value of |
| TcpExtListenOverflows and TcpExtListenDrops would be larger, because |
| the SYN of the 4th nc was dropped, the client was retrying. |
| |
| IpInAddrErrors, IpExtInNoRoutes and IpOutNoRoutes |
| ---------------------------------------------- |
| server A IP address: 192.168.122.250 |
| server B IP address: 192.168.122.251 |
| Prepare on server A, add a route to server B:: |
| |
| $ sudo ip route add 8.8.8.8/32 via 192.168.122.251 |
| |
| Prepare on server B, disable send_redirects for all interfaces:: |
| |
| $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.send_redirects=0 |
| $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.ens3.send_redirects=0 |
| $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.lo.send_redirects=0 |
| $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.default.send_redirects=0 |
| |
| We want to let sever A send a packet to 8.8.8.8, and route the packet |
| to server B. When server B receives such packet, it might send a ICMP |
| Redirect message to server A, set send_redirects to 0 will disable |
| this behavior. |
| |
| First, generate InAddrErrors. On server B, we disable IP forwarding:: |
| |
| $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding=0 |
| |
| On server A, we send packets to 8.8.8.8:: |
| |
| $ nc -v 8.8.8.8 53 |
| |
| On server B, we check the output of nstat:: |
| |
| $ nstat |
| #kernel |
| IpInReceives 3 0.0 |
| IpInAddrErrors 3 0.0 |
| IpExtInOctets 180 0.0 |
| IpExtInNoECTPkts 3 0.0 |
| |
| As we have let server A route 8.8.8.8 to server B, and we disabled IP |
| forwarding on server B, Server A sent packets to server B, then server B |
| dropped packets and increased IpInAddrErrors. As the nc command would |
| re-send the SYN packet if it didn't receive a SYN+ACK, we could find |
| multiple IpInAddrErrors. |
| |
| Second, generate IpExtInNoRoutes. On server B, we enable IP |
| forwarding:: |
| |
| $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding=1 |
| |
| Check the route table of server B and remove the default route:: |
| |
| $ ip route show |
| default via 192.168.122.1 dev ens3 proto static |
| 192.168.122.0/24 dev ens3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.122.251 |
| $ sudo ip route delete default via 192.168.122.1 dev ens3 proto static |
| |
| On server A, we contact 8.8.8.8 again:: |
| |
| $ nc -v 8.8.8.8 53 |
| nc: connect to 8.8.8.8 port 53 (tcp) failed: Network is unreachable |
| |
| On server B, run nstat:: |
| |
| $ nstat |
| #kernel |
| IpInReceives 1 0.0 |
| IpOutRequests 1 0.0 |
| IcmpOutMsgs 1 0.0 |
| IcmpOutDestUnreachs 1 0.0 |
| IcmpMsgOutType3 1 0.0 |
| IpExtInNoRoutes 1 0.0 |
| IpExtInOctets 60 0.0 |
| IpExtOutOctets 88 0.0 |
| IpExtInNoECTPkts 1 0.0 |
| |
| We enabled IP forwarding on server B, when server B received a packet |
| which destination IP address is 8.8.8.8, server B will try to forward |
| this packet. We have deleted the default route, there was no route for |
| 8.8.8.8, so server B increase IpExtInNoRoutes and sent the "ICMP |
| Destination Unreachable" message to server A. |
| |
| Third, generate IpOutNoRoutes. Run ping command on server B:: |
| |
| $ ping -c 1 8.8.8.8 |
| connect: Network is unreachable |
| |
| Run nstat on server B:: |
| |
| $ nstat |
| #kernel |
| IpOutNoRoutes 1 0.0 |
| |
| We have deleted the default route on server B. Server B couldn't find |
| a route for the 8.8.8.8 IP address, so server B increased |
| IpOutNoRoutes. |
| |
| TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv |
| ------------------------ |
| In this test, we send 3 same SYN packets from client to server. The |
| first SYN will let server create a socket, set it to Syn-Recv status, |
| and reply a SYN/ACK. The second SYN will let server reply the SYN/ACK |
| again, and record the reply time (the duplicate ACK reply time). The |
| third SYN will let server check the previous duplicate ACK reply time, |
| and decide to skip the duplicate ACK, then increase the |
| TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv counter. |
| |
| Run tcpdump to capture a SYN packet:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ sudo tcpdump -c 1 -w /tmp/syn.pcap port 9000 |
| tcpdump: listening on ens3, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes |
| |
| Open another terminal, run nc command:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc nstat-b 9000 |
| |
| As the nstat-b didn't listen on port 9000, it should reply a RST, and |
| the nc command exited immediately. It was enough for the tcpdump |
| command to capture a SYN packet. A linux server might use hardware |
| offload for the TCP checksum, so the checksum in the /tmp/syn.pcap |
| might be not correct. We call tcprewrite to fix it:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ tcprewrite --infile=/tmp/syn.pcap --outfile=/tmp/syn_fixcsum.pcap --fixcsum |
| |
| On nstat-b, we run nc to listen on port 9000:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 9000 |
| Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) |
| |
| On nstat-a, we blocked the packet from port 9000, or nstat-a would send |
| RST to nstat-b:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --sport 9000 -j DROP |
| |
| Send 3 SYN repeatly to nstat-b:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ for i in {1..3}; do sudo tcpreplay -i ens3 /tmp/syn_fixcsum.pcap; done |
| |
| Check snmp cunter on nstat-b:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i skip |
| TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv 1 0.0 |
| |
| As we expected, TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv is 1. |
| |
| TcpExtTCPACKSkippedPAWS |
| ---------------------- |
| To trigger PAWS, we could send an old SYN. |
| |
| On nstat-b, let nc listen on port 9000:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 9000 |
| Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) |
| |
| On nstat-a, run tcpdump to capture a SYN:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ sudo tcpdump -w /tmp/paws_pre.pcap -c 1 port 9000 |
| tcpdump: listening on ens3, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes |
| |
| On nstat-a, run nc as a client to connect nstat-b:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 |
| Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| |
| Now the tcpdump has captured the SYN and exit. We should fix the |
| checksum:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ tcprewrite --infile /tmp/paws_pre.pcap --outfile /tmp/paws.pcap --fixcsum |
| |
| Send the SYN packet twice:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ for i in {1..2}; do sudo tcpreplay -i ens3 /tmp/paws.pcap; done |
| |
| On nstat-b, check the snmp counter:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i skip |
| TcpExtTCPACKSkippedPAWS 1 0.0 |
| |
| We sent two SYN via tcpreplay, both of them would let PAWS check |
| failed, the nstat-b replied an ACK for the first SYN, skipped the ACK |
| for the second SYN, and updated TcpExtTCPACKSkippedPAWS. |
| |
| TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSeq |
| -------------------- |
| To trigger TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSeq, we send packets which have valid |
| timestamp (to pass PAWS check) but the sequence number is out of |
| window. The linux TCP stack would avoid to skip if the packet has |
| data, so we need a pure ACK packet. To generate such a packet, we |
| could create two sockets: one on port 9000, another on port 9001. Then |
| we capture an ACK on port 9001, change the source/destination port |
| numbers to match the port 9000 socket. Then we could trigger |
| TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSeq via this packet. |
| |
| On nstat-b, open two terminals, run two nc commands to listen on both |
| port 9000 and port 9001:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 9000 |
| Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 9001 |
| Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9001) |
| |
| On nstat-a, run two nc clients:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 |
| Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9001 |
| Connection to nstat-b 9001 port [tcp/*] succeeded! |
| |
| On nstat-a, run tcpdump to capture an ACK:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ sudo tcpdump -w /tmp/seq_pre.pcap -c 1 dst port 9001 |
| tcpdump: listening on ens3, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes |
| |
| On nstat-b, send a packet via the port 9001 socket. E.g. we sent a |
| string 'foo' in our example:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 9001 |
| Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9001) |
| Connection from nstat-a 42132 received! |
| foo |
| |
| On nstat-a, the tcpdump should have caputred the ACK. We should check |
| the source port numbers of the two nc clients:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ ss -ta '( dport = :9000 || dport = :9001 )' | tee |
| State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port |
| ESTAB 0 0 192.168.122.250:50208 192.168.122.251:9000 |
| ESTAB 0 0 192.168.122.250:42132 192.168.122.251:9001 |
| |
| Run tcprewrite, change port 9001 to port 9000, chagne port 42132 to |
| port 50208:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ tcprewrite --infile /tmp/seq_pre.pcap --outfile /tmp/seq.pcap -r 9001:9000 -r 42132:50208 --fixcsum |
| |
| Now the /tmp/seq.pcap is the packet we need. Send it to nstat-b:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ for i in {1..2}; do sudo tcpreplay -i ens3 /tmp/seq.pcap; done |
| |
| Check TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSeq on nstat-b:: |
| |
| nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i skip |
| TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSeq 1 0.0 |