| .. hmm: |
| |
| ===================================== |
| Heterogeneous Memory Management (HMM) |
| ===================================== |
| |
| Provide infrastructure and helpers to integrate non-conventional memory (device |
| memory like GPU on board memory) into regular kernel path, with the cornerstone |
| of this being specialized struct page for such memory (see sections 5 to 7 of |
| this document). |
| |
| HMM also provides optional helpers for SVM (Share Virtual Memory), i.e., |
| allowing a device to transparently access program address coherently with |
| the CPU meaning that any valid pointer on the CPU is also a valid pointer |
| for the device. This is becoming mandatory to simplify the use of advanced |
| heterogeneous computing where GPU, DSP, or FPGA are used to perform various |
| computations on behalf of a process. |
| |
| This document is divided as follows: in the first section I expose the problems |
| related to using device specific memory allocators. In the second section, I |
| expose the hardware limitations that are inherent to many platforms. The third |
| section gives an overview of the HMM design. The fourth section explains how |
| CPU page-table mirroring works and the purpose of HMM in this context. The |
| fifth section deals with how device memory is represented inside the kernel. |
| Finally, the last section presents a new migration helper that allows lever- |
| aging the device DMA engine. |
| |
| .. contents:: :local: |
| |
| Problems of using a device specific memory allocator |
| ==================================================== |
| |
| Devices with a large amount of on board memory (several gigabytes) like GPUs |
| have historically managed their memory through dedicated driver specific APIs. |
| This creates a disconnect between memory allocated and managed by a device |
| driver and regular application memory (private anonymous, shared memory, or |
| regular file backed memory). From here on I will refer to this aspect as split |
| address space. I use shared address space to refer to the opposite situation: |
| i.e., one in which any application memory region can be used by a device |
| transparently. |
| |
| Split address space happens because device can only access memory allocated |
| through device specific API. This implies that all memory objects in a program |
| are not equal from the device point of view which complicates large programs |
| that rely on a wide set of libraries. |
| |
| Concretely this means that code that wants to leverage devices like GPUs needs |
| to copy object between generically allocated memory (malloc, mmap private, mmap |
| share) and memory allocated through the device driver API (this still ends up |
| with an mmap but of the device file). |
| |
| For flat data sets (array, grid, image, ...) this isn't too hard to achieve but |
| complex data sets (list, tree, ...) are hard to get right. Duplicating a |
| complex data set needs to re-map all the pointer relations between each of its |
| elements. This is error prone and program gets harder to debug because of the |
| duplicate data set and addresses. |
| |
| Split address space also means that libraries cannot transparently use data |
| they are getting from the core program or another library and thus each library |
| might have to duplicate its input data set using the device specific memory |
| allocator. Large projects suffer from this and waste resources because of the |
| various memory copies. |
| |
| Duplicating each library API to accept as input or output memory allocated by |
| each device specific allocator is not a viable option. It would lead to a |
| combinatorial explosion in the library entry points. |
| |
| Finally, with the advance of high level language constructs (in C++ but in |
| other languages too) it is now possible for the compiler to leverage GPUs and |
| other devices without programmer knowledge. Some compiler identified patterns |
| are only do-able with a shared address space. It is also more reasonable to use |
| a shared address space for all other patterns. |
| |
| |
| I/O bus, device memory characteristics |
| ====================================== |
| |
| I/O buses cripple shared address spaces due to a few limitations. Most I/O |
| buses only allow basic memory access from device to main memory; even cache |
| coherency is often optional. Access to device memory from CPU is even more |
| limited. More often than not, it is not cache coherent. |
| |
| If we only consider the PCIE bus, then a device can access main memory (often |
| through an IOMMU) and be cache coherent with the CPUs. However, it only allows |
| a limited set of atomic operations from device on main memory. This is worse |
| in the other direction: the CPU can only access a limited range of the device |
| memory and cannot perform atomic operations on it. Thus device memory cannot |
| be considered the same as regular memory from the kernel point of view. |
| |
| Another crippling factor is the limited bandwidth (~32GBytes/s with PCIE 4.0 |
| and 16 lanes). This is 33 times less than the fastest GPU memory (1 TBytes/s). |
| The final limitation is latency. Access to main memory from the device has an |
| order of magnitude higher latency than when the device accesses its own memory. |
| |
| Some platforms are developing new I/O buses or additions/modifications to PCIE |
| to address some of these limitations (OpenCAPI, CCIX). They mainly allow two- |
| way cache coherency between CPU and device and allow all atomic operations the |
| architecture supports. Sadly, not all platforms are following this trend and |
| some major architectures are left without hardware solutions to these problems. |
| |
| So for shared address space to make sense, not only must we allow devices to |
| access any memory but we must also permit any memory to be migrated to device |
| memory while device is using it (blocking CPU access while it happens). |
| |
| |
| Shared address space and migration |
| ================================== |
| |
| HMM intends to provide two main features. First one is to share the address |
| space by duplicating the CPU page table in the device page table so the same |
| address points to the same physical memory for any valid main memory address in |
| the process address space. |
| |
| To achieve this, HMM offers a set of helpers to populate the device page table |
| while keeping track of CPU page table updates. Device page table updates are |
| not as easy as CPU page table updates. To update the device page table, you must |
| allocate a buffer (or use a pool of pre-allocated buffers) and write GPU |
| specific commands in it to perform the update (unmap, cache invalidations, and |
| flush, ...). This cannot be done through common code for all devices. Hence |
| why HMM provides helpers to factor out everything that can be while leaving the |
| hardware specific details to the device driver. |
| |
| The second mechanism HMM provides is a new kind of ZONE_DEVICE memory that |
| allows allocating a struct page for each page of the device memory. Those pages |
| are special because the CPU cannot map them. However, they allow migrating |
| main memory to device memory using existing migration mechanisms and everything |
| looks like a page is swapped out to disk from the CPU point of view. Using a |
| struct page gives the easiest and cleanest integration with existing mm mech- |
| anisms. Here again, HMM only provides helpers, first to hotplug new ZONE_DEVICE |
| memory for the device memory and second to perform migration. Policy decisions |
| of what and when to migrate things is left to the device driver. |
| |
| Note that any CPU access to a device page triggers a page fault and a migration |
| back to main memory. For example, when a page backing a given CPU address A is |
| migrated from a main memory page to a device page, then any CPU access to |
| address A triggers a page fault and initiates a migration back to main memory. |
| |
| With these two features, HMM not only allows a device to mirror process address |
| space and keeping both CPU and device page table synchronized, but also lever- |
| ages device memory by migrating the part of the data set that is actively being |
| used by the device. |
| |
| |
| Address space mirroring implementation and API |
| ============================================== |
| |
| Address space mirroring's main objective is to allow duplication of a range of |
| CPU page table into a device page table; HMM helps keep both synchronized. A |
| device driver that wants to mirror a process address space must start with the |
| registration of an hmm_mirror struct:: |
| |
| int hmm_mirror_register(struct hmm_mirror *mirror, |
| struct mm_struct *mm); |
| int hmm_mirror_register_locked(struct hmm_mirror *mirror, |
| struct mm_struct *mm); |
| |
| |
| The locked variant is to be used when the driver is already holding mmap_sem |
| of the mm in write mode. The mirror struct has a set of callbacks that are used |
| to propagate CPU page tables:: |
| |
| struct hmm_mirror_ops { |
| /* sync_cpu_device_pagetables() - synchronize page tables |
| * |
| * @mirror: pointer to struct hmm_mirror |
| * @update_type: type of update that occurred to the CPU page table |
| * @start: virtual start address of the range to update |
| * @end: virtual end address of the range to update |
| * |
| * This callback ultimately originates from mmu_notifiers when the CPU |
| * page table is updated. The device driver must update its page table |
| * in response to this callback. The update argument tells what action |
| * to perform. |
| * |
| * The device driver must not return from this callback until the device |
| * page tables are completely updated (TLBs flushed, etc); this is a |
| * synchronous call. |
| */ |
| void (*update)(struct hmm_mirror *mirror, |
| enum hmm_update action, |
| unsigned long start, |
| unsigned long end); |
| }; |
| |
| The device driver must perform the update action to the range (mark range |
| read only, or fully unmap, ...). The device must be done with the update before |
| the driver callback returns. |
| |
| When the device driver wants to populate a range of virtual addresses, it can |
| use either:: |
| |
| long hmm_range_snapshot(struct hmm_range *range); |
| long hmm_range_fault(struct hmm_range *range, bool block); |
| |
| The first one (hmm_range_snapshot()) will only fetch present CPU page table |
| entries and will not trigger a page fault on missing or non-present entries. |
| The second one does trigger a page fault on missing or read-only entry if the |
| write parameter is true. Page faults use the generic mm page fault code path |
| just like a CPU page fault. |
| |
| Both functions copy CPU page table entries into their pfns array argument. Each |
| entry in that array corresponds to an address in the virtual range. HMM |
| provides a set of flags to help the driver identify special CPU page table |
| entries. |
| |
| Locking with the update() callback is the most important aspect the driver must |
| respect in order to keep things properly synchronized. The usage pattern is:: |
| |
| int driver_populate_range(...) |
| { |
| struct hmm_range range; |
| ... |
| |
| range.start = ...; |
| range.end = ...; |
| range.pfns = ...; |
| range.flags = ...; |
| range.values = ...; |
| range.pfn_shift = ...; |
| hmm_range_register(&range); |
| |
| /* |
| * Just wait for range to be valid, safe to ignore return value as we |
| * will use the return value of hmm_range_snapshot() below under the |
| * mmap_sem to ascertain the validity of the range. |
| */ |
| hmm_range_wait_until_valid(&range, TIMEOUT_IN_MSEC); |
| |
| again: |
| down_read(&mm->mmap_sem); |
| ret = hmm_range_snapshot(&range); |
| if (ret) { |
| up_read(&mm->mmap_sem); |
| if (ret == -EAGAIN) { |
| /* |
| * No need to check hmm_range_wait_until_valid() return value |
| * on retry we will get proper error with hmm_range_snapshot() |
| */ |
| hmm_range_wait_until_valid(&range, TIMEOUT_IN_MSEC); |
| goto again; |
| } |
| hmm_mirror_unregister(&range); |
| return ret; |
| } |
| take_lock(driver->update); |
| if (!range.valid) { |
| release_lock(driver->update); |
| up_read(&mm->mmap_sem); |
| goto again; |
| } |
| |
| // Use pfns array content to update device page table |
| |
| hmm_mirror_unregister(&range); |
| release_lock(driver->update); |
| up_read(&mm->mmap_sem); |
| return 0; |
| } |
| |
| The driver->update lock is the same lock that the driver takes inside its |
| update() callback. That lock must be held before checking the range.valid |
| field to avoid any race with a concurrent CPU page table update. |
| |
| HMM implements all this on top of the mmu_notifier API because we wanted a |
| simpler API and also to be able to perform optimizations latter on like doing |
| concurrent device updates in multi-devices scenario. |
| |
| HMM also serves as an impedance mismatch between how CPU page table updates |
| are done (by CPU write to the page table and TLB flushes) and how devices |
| update their own page table. Device updates are a multi-step process. First, |
| appropriate commands are written to a buffer, then this buffer is scheduled for |
| execution on the device. It is only once the device has executed commands in |
| the buffer that the update is done. Creating and scheduling the update command |
| buffer can happen concurrently for multiple devices. Waiting for each device to |
| report commands as executed is serialized (there is no point in doing this |
| concurrently). |
| |
| |
| Leverage default_flags and pfn_flags_mask |
| ========================================= |
| |
| The hmm_range struct has 2 fields default_flags and pfn_flags_mask that allows |
| to set fault or snapshot policy for a whole range instead of having to set them |
| for each entries in the range. |
| |
| For instance if the device flags for device entries are: |
| VALID (1 << 63) |
| WRITE (1 << 62) |
| |
| Now let say that device driver wants to fault with at least read a range then |
| it does set: |
| range->default_flags = (1 << 63) |
| range->pfn_flags_mask = 0; |
| |
| and calls hmm_range_fault() as described above. This will fill fault all page |
| in the range with at least read permission. |
| |
| Now let say driver wants to do the same except for one page in the range for |
| which its want to have write. Now driver set: |
| range->default_flags = (1 << 63); |
| range->pfn_flags_mask = (1 << 62); |
| range->pfns[index_of_write] = (1 << 62); |
| |
| With this HMM will fault in all page with at least read (ie valid) and for the |
| address == range->start + (index_of_write << PAGE_SHIFT) it will fault with |
| write permission ie if the CPU pte does not have write permission set then HMM |
| will call handle_mm_fault(). |
| |
| Note that HMM will populate the pfns array with write permission for any entry |
| that have write permission within the CPU pte no matter what are the values set |
| in default_flags or pfn_flags_mask. |
| |
| |
| Represent and manage device memory from core kernel point of view |
| ================================================================= |
| |
| Several different designs were tried to support device memory. First one used |
| a device specific data structure to keep information about migrated memory and |
| HMM hooked itself in various places of mm code to handle any access to |
| addresses that were backed by device memory. It turns out that this ended up |
| replicating most of the fields of struct page and also needed many kernel code |
| paths to be updated to understand this new kind of memory. |
| |
| Most kernel code paths never try to access the memory behind a page |
| but only care about struct page contents. Because of this, HMM switched to |
| directly using struct page for device memory which left most kernel code paths |
| unaware of the difference. We only need to make sure that no one ever tries to |
| map those pages from the CPU side. |
| |
| HMM provides a set of helpers to register and hotplug device memory as a new |
| region needing a struct page. This is offered through a very simple API:: |
| |
| struct hmm_devmem *hmm_devmem_add(const struct hmm_devmem_ops *ops, |
| struct device *device, |
| unsigned long size); |
| void hmm_devmem_remove(struct hmm_devmem *devmem); |
| |
| The hmm_devmem_ops is where most of the important things are:: |
| |
| struct hmm_devmem_ops { |
| void (*free)(struct hmm_devmem *devmem, struct page *page); |
| int (*fault)(struct hmm_devmem *devmem, |
| struct vm_area_struct *vma, |
| unsigned long addr, |
| struct page *page, |
| unsigned flags, |
| pmd_t *pmdp); |
| }; |
| |
| The first callback (free()) happens when the last reference on a device page is |
| dropped. This means the device page is now free and no longer used by anyone. |
| The second callback happens whenever the CPU tries to access a device page |
| which it cannot do. This second callback must trigger a migration back to |
| system memory. |
| |
| |
| Migration to and from device memory |
| =================================== |
| |
| Because the CPU cannot access device memory, migration must use the device DMA |
| engine to perform copy from and to device memory. For this we need a new |
| migration helper:: |
| |
| int migrate_vma(const struct migrate_vma_ops *ops, |
| struct vm_area_struct *vma, |
| unsigned long mentries, |
| unsigned long start, |
| unsigned long end, |
| unsigned long *src, |
| unsigned long *dst, |
| void *private); |
| |
| Unlike other migration functions it works on a range of virtual address, there |
| are two reasons for that. First, device DMA copy has a high setup overhead cost |
| and thus batching multiple pages is needed as otherwise the migration overhead |
| makes the whole exercise pointless. The second reason is because the |
| migration might be for a range of addresses the device is actively accessing. |
| |
| The migrate_vma_ops struct defines two callbacks. First one (alloc_and_copy()) |
| controls destination memory allocation and copy operation. Second one is there |
| to allow the device driver to perform cleanup operations after migration:: |
| |
| struct migrate_vma_ops { |
| void (*alloc_and_copy)(struct vm_area_struct *vma, |
| const unsigned long *src, |
| unsigned long *dst, |
| unsigned long start, |
| unsigned long end, |
| void *private); |
| void (*finalize_and_map)(struct vm_area_struct *vma, |
| const unsigned long *src, |
| const unsigned long *dst, |
| unsigned long start, |
| unsigned long end, |
| void *private); |
| }; |
| |
| It is important to stress that these migration helpers allow for holes in the |
| virtual address range. Some pages in the range might not be migrated for all |
| the usual reasons (page is pinned, page is locked, ...). This helper does not |
| fail but just skips over those pages. |
| |
| The alloc_and_copy() might decide to not migrate all pages in the |
| range (for reasons under the callback control). For those, the callback just |
| has to leave the corresponding dst entry empty. |
| |
| Finally, the migration of the struct page might fail (for file backed page) for |
| various reasons (failure to freeze reference, or update page cache, ...). If |
| that happens, then the finalize_and_map() can catch any pages that were not |
| migrated. Note those pages were still copied to a new page and thus we wasted |
| bandwidth but this is considered as a rare event and a price that we are |
| willing to pay to keep all the code simpler. |
| |
| |
| Memory cgroup (memcg) and rss accounting |
| ======================================== |
| |
| For now device memory is accounted as any regular page in rss counters (either |
| anonymous if device page is used for anonymous, file if device page is used for |
| file backed page or shmem if device page is used for shared memory). This is a |
| deliberate choice to keep existing applications, that might start using device |
| memory without knowing about it, running unimpacted. |
| |
| A drawback is that the OOM killer might kill an application using a lot of |
| device memory and not a lot of regular system memory and thus not freeing much |
| system memory. We want to gather more real world experience on how applications |
| and system react under memory pressure in the presence of device memory before |
| deciding to account device memory differently. |
| |
| |
| Same decision was made for memory cgroup. Device memory pages are accounted |
| against same memory cgroup a regular page would be accounted to. This does |
| simplify migration to and from device memory. This also means that migration |
| back from device memory to regular memory cannot fail because it would |
| go above memory cgroup limit. We might revisit this choice latter on once we |
| get more experience in how device memory is used and its impact on memory |
| resource control. |
| |
| |
| Note that device memory can never be pinned by device driver nor through GUP |
| and thus such memory is always free upon process exit. Or when last reference |
| is dropped in case of shared memory or file backed memory. |