| Netfilter's flowtable infrastructure |
| ==================================== |
| |
| This documentation describes the software flowtable infrastructure available in |
| Netfilter since Linux kernel 4.16. |
| |
| Overview |
| -------- |
| |
| Initial packets follow the classic forwarding path, once the flow enters the |
| established state according to the conntrack semantics (ie. we have seen traffic |
| in both directions), then you can decide to offload the flow to the flowtable |
| from the forward chain via the 'flow offload' action available in nftables. |
| |
| Packets that find an entry in the flowtable (ie. flowtable hit) are sent to the |
| output netdevice via neigh_xmit(), hence, they bypass the classic forwarding |
| path (the visible effect is that you do not see these packets from any of the |
| netfilter hooks coming after the ingress). In case of flowtable miss, the packet |
| follows the classic forward path. |
| |
| The flowtable uses a resizable hashtable, lookups are based on the following |
| 7-tuple selectors: source, destination, layer 3 and layer 4 protocols, source |
| and destination ports and the input interface (useful in case there are several |
| conntrack zones in place). |
| |
| Flowtables are populated via the 'flow offload' nftables action, so the user can |
| selectively specify what flows are placed into the flow table. Hence, packets |
| follow the classic forwarding path unless the user explicitly instruct packets |
| to use this new alternative forwarding path via nftables policy. |
| |
| This is represented in Fig.1, which describes the classic forwarding path |
| including the Netfilter hooks and the flowtable fastpath bypass. |
| |
| userspace process |
| ^ | |
| | | |
| _____|____ ____\/___ |
| / \ / \ |
| | input | | output | |
| \__________/ \_________/ |
| ^ | |
| | | |
| _________ __________ --------- _____\/_____ |
| / \ / \ |Routing | / \ |
| --> ingress ---> prerouting ---> |decision| | postrouting |--> neigh_xmit |
| \_________/ \__________/ ---------- \____________/ ^ |
| | ^ | ^ | |
| flowtable | ____\/___ | | |
| | | / \ | | |
| __\/___ | | forward |------------ | |
| |-----| | \_________/ | |
| |-----| | 'flow offload' rule | |
| |-----| | adds entry to | |
| |_____| | flowtable | |
| | | | |
| / \ | | |
| /hit\_no_| | |
| \ ? / | |
| \ / | |
| |__yes_________________fastpath bypass ____________________________| |
| |
| Fig.1 Netfilter hooks and flowtable interactions |
| |
| The flowtable entry also stores the NAT configuration, so all packets are |
| mangled according to the NAT policy that matches the initial packets that went |
| through the classic forwarding path. The TTL is decremented before calling |
| neigh_xmit(). Fragmented traffic is passed up to follow the classic forwarding |
| path given that the transport selectors are missing, therefore flowtable lookup |
| is not possible. |
| |
| Example configuration |
| --------------------- |
| |
| Enabling the flowtable bypass is relatively easy, you only need to create a |
| flowtable and add one rule to your forward chain. |
| |
| table inet x { |
| flowtable f { |
| hook ingress priority 0 devices = { eth0, eth1 }; |
| } |
| chain y { |
| type filter hook forward priority 0; policy accept; |
| ip protocol tcp flow offload @f |
| counter packets 0 bytes 0 |
| } |
| } |
| |
| This example adds the flowtable 'f' to the ingress hook of the eth0 and eth1 |
| netdevices. You can create as many flowtables as you want in case you need to |
| perform resource partitioning. The flowtable priority defines the order in which |
| hooks are run in the pipeline, this is convenient in case you already have a |
| nftables ingress chain (make sure the flowtable priority is smaller than the |
| nftables ingress chain hence the flowtable runs before in the pipeline). |
| |
| The 'flow offload' action from the forward chain 'y' adds an entry to the |
| flowtable for the TCP syn-ack packet coming in the reply direction. Once the |
| flow is offloaded, you will observe that the counter rule in the example above |
| does not get updated for the packets that are being forwarded through the |
| forwarding bypass. |
| |
| More reading |
| ------------ |
| |
| This documentation is based on the LWN.net articles [1][2]. Rafal Milecki also |
| made a very complete and comprehensive summary called "A state of network |
| acceleration" that describes how things were before this infrastructure was |
| mailined [3] and it also makes a rough summary of this work [4]. |
| |
| [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/738214/ |
| [2] https://lwn.net/Articles/742164/ |
| [3] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2018-January/010830.html |
| [4] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2018-January/010829.html |