| .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 | |
| ===================== | |
| Syscall User Dispatch | |
| ===================== | |
| Background | |
| ---------- | |
| Compatibility layers like Wine need a way to efficiently emulate system | |
| calls of only a part of their process - the part that has the | |
| incompatible code - while being able to execute native syscalls without | |
| a high performance penalty on the native part of the process. Seccomp | |
| falls short on this task, since it has limited support to efficiently | |
| filter syscalls based on memory regions, and it doesn't support removing | |
| filters. Therefore a new mechanism is necessary. | |
| Syscall User Dispatch brings the filtering of the syscall dispatcher | |
| address back to userspace. The application is in control of a flip | |
| switch, indicating the current personality of the process. A | |
| multiple-personality application can then flip the switch without | |
| invoking the kernel, when crossing the compatibility layer API | |
| boundaries, to enable/disable the syscall redirection and execute | |
| syscalls directly (disabled) or send them to be emulated in userspace | |
| through a SIGSYS. | |
| The goal of this design is to provide very quick compatibility layer | |
| boundary crosses, which is achieved by not executing a syscall to change | |
| personality every time the compatibility layer executes. Instead, a | |
| userspace memory region exposed to the kernel indicates the current | |
| personality, and the application simply modifies that variable to | |
| configure the mechanism. | |
| There is a relatively high cost associated with handling signals on most | |
| architectures, like x86, but at least for Wine, syscalls issued by | |
| native Windows code are currently not known to be a performance problem, | |
| since they are quite rare, at least for modern gaming applications. | |
| Since this mechanism is designed to capture syscalls issued by | |
| non-native applications, it must function on syscalls whose invocation | |
| ABI is completely unexpected to Linux. Syscall User Dispatch, therefore | |
| doesn't rely on any of the syscall ABI to make the filtering. It uses | |
| only the syscall dispatcher address and the userspace key. | |
| As the ABI of these intercepted syscalls is unknown to Linux, these | |
| syscalls are not instrumentable via ptrace or the syscall tracepoints. | |
| Interface | |
| --------- | |
| A thread can setup this mechanism on supported kernels by executing the | |
| following prctl: | |
| prctl(PR_SET_SYSCALL_USER_DISPATCH, <op>, <offset>, <length>, [selector]) | |
| <op> is either PR_SYS_DISPATCH_EXCLUSIVE_ON/PR_SYS_DISPATCH_INCLUSIVE_ON | |
| or PR_SYS_DISPATCH_OFF, to enable and disable the mechanism globally for | |
| that thread. When PR_SYS_DISPATCH_OFF is used, the other fields must be zero. | |
| For PR_SYS_DISPATCH_EXCLUSIVE_ON [<offset>, <offset>+<length>) delimit | |
| a memory region interval from which syscalls are always executed directly, | |
| regardless of the userspace selector. This provides a fast path for the | |
| C library, which includes the most common syscall dispatchers in the native | |
| code applications, and also provides a way for the signal handler to return | |
| without triggering a nested SIGSYS on (rt\_)sigreturn. Users of this | |
| interface should make sure that at least the signal trampoline code is | |
| included in this region. In addition, for syscalls that implement the | |
| trampoline code on the vDSO, that trampoline is never intercepted. | |
| For PR_SYS_DISPATCH_INCLUSIVE_ON [<offset>, <offset>+<length>) delimit | |
| a memory region interval from which syscalls are dispatched based on | |
| the userspace selector. Syscalls from outside of the range are always | |
| executed directly. | |
| [selector] is a pointer to a char-sized region in the process memory | |
| region, that provides a quick way to enable disable syscall redirection | |
| thread-wide, without the need to invoke the kernel directly. selector | |
| can be set to SYSCALL_DISPATCH_FILTER_ALLOW or SYSCALL_DISPATCH_FILTER_BLOCK. | |
| Any other value should terminate the program with a SIGSYS. | |
| Additionally, a tasks syscall user dispatch configuration can be peeked | |
| and poked via the PTRACE_(GET|SET)_SYSCALL_USER_DISPATCH_CONFIG ptrace | |
| requests. This is useful for checkpoint/restart software. | |
| Security Notes | |
| -------------- | |
| Syscall User Dispatch provides functionality for compatibility layers to | |
| quickly capture system calls issued by a non-native part of the | |
| application, while not impacting the Linux native regions of the | |
| process. It is not a mechanism for sandboxing system calls, and it | |
| should not be seen as a security mechanism, since it is trivial for a | |
| malicious application to subvert the mechanism by jumping to an allowed | |
| dispatcher region prior to executing the syscall, or to discover the | |
| address and modify the selector value. If the use case requires any | |
| kind of security sandboxing, Seccomp should be used instead. | |
| Any fork or exec of the existing process resets the mechanism to | |
| PR_SYS_DISPATCH_OFF. |