| The Linux kernel GTP tunneling module |
| ====================================================================== |
| Documentation by Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> and |
| Andreas Schultz <aschultz@tpip.net> |
| |
| In 'drivers/net/gtp.c' you are finding a kernel-level implementation |
| of a GTP tunnel endpoint. |
| |
| == What is GTP == |
| |
| GTP is the Generic Tunnel Protocol, which is a 3GPP protocol used for |
| tunneling User-IP payload between a mobile station (phone, modem) |
| and the interconnection between an external packet data network (such |
| as the internet). |
| |
| So when you start a 'data connection' from your mobile phone, the |
| phone will use the control plane to signal for the establishment of |
| such a tunnel between that external data network and the phone. The |
| tunnel endpoints thus reside on the phone and in the gateway. All |
| intermediate nodes just transport the encapsulated packet. |
| |
| The phone itself does not implement GTP but uses some other |
| technology-dependent protocol stack for transmitting the user IP |
| payload, such as LLC/SNDCP/RLC/MAC. |
| |
| At some network element inside the cellular operator infrastructure |
| (SGSN in case of GPRS/EGPRS or classic UMTS, hNodeB in case of a 3G |
| femtocell, eNodeB in case of 4G/LTE), the cellular protocol stacking |
| is translated into GTP *without breaking the end-to-end tunnel*. So |
| intermediate nodes just perform some specific relay function. |
| |
| At some point the GTP packet ends up on the so-called GGSN (GSM/UMTS) |
| or P-GW (LTE), which terminates the tunnel, decapsulates the packet |
| and forwards it onto an external packet data network. This can be |
| public internet, but can also be any private IP network (or even |
| theoretically some non-IP network like X.25). |
| |
| You can find the protocol specification in 3GPP TS 29.060, available |
| publicly via the 3GPP website at http://www.3gpp.org/DynaReport/29060.htm |
| |
| A direct PDF link to v13.6.0 is provided for convenience below: |
| http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/129000_129099/129060/13.06.00_60/ts_129060v130600p.pdf |
| |
| == The Linux GTP tunnelling module == |
| |
| The module implements the function of a tunnel endpoint, i.e. it is |
| able to decapsulate tunneled IP packets in the uplink originated by |
| the phone, and encapsulate raw IP packets received from the external |
| packet network in downlink towards the phone. |
| |
| It *only* implements the so-called 'user plane', carrying the User-IP |
| payload, called GTP-U. It does not implement the 'control plane', |
| which is a signaling protocol used for establishment and teardown of |
| GTP tunnels (GTP-C). |
| |
| So in order to have a working GGSN/P-GW setup, you will need a |
| userspace program that implements the GTP-C protocol and which then |
| uses the netlink interface provided by the GTP-U module in the kernel |
| to configure the kernel module. |
| |
| This split architecture follows the tunneling modules of other |
| protocols, e.g. PPPoE or L2TP, where you also run a userspace daemon |
| to handle the tunnel establishment, authentication etc. and only the |
| data plane is accelerated inside the kernel. |
| |
| Don't be confused by terminology: The GTP User Plane goes through |
| kernel accelerated path, while the GTP Control Plane goes to |
| Userspace :) |
| |
| The official homepage of the module is at |
| https://osmocom.org/projects/linux-kernel-gtp-u/wiki |
| |
| == Userspace Programs with Linux Kernel GTP-U support == |
| |
| At the time of this writing, there are at least two Free Software |
| implementations that implement GTP-C and can use the netlink interface |
| to make use of the Linux kernel GTP-U support: |
| |
| * OpenGGSN (classic 2G/3G GGSN in C): |
| https://osmocom.org/projects/openggsn/wiki/OpenGGSN |
| |
| * ergw (GGSN + P-GW in Erlang): |
| https://github.com/travelping/ergw |
| |
| == Userspace Library / Command Line Utilities == |
| |
| There is a userspace library called 'libgtpnl' which is based on |
| libmnl and which implements a C-language API towards the netlink |
| interface provided by the Kernel GTP module: |
| |
| http://git.osmocom.org/libgtpnl/ |
| |
| == Protocol Versions == |
| |
| There are two different versions of GTP-U: v0 [GSM TS 09.60] and v1 |
| [3GPP TS 29.281]. Both are implemented in the Kernel GTP module. |
| Version 0 is a legacy version, and deprecated from recent 3GPP |
| specifications. |
| |
| GTP-U uses UDP for transporting PDUs. The receiving UDP port is 2151 |
| for GTPv1-U and 3386 for GTPv0-U. |
| |
| There are three versions of GTP-C: v0, v1, and v2. As the kernel |
| doesn't implement GTP-C, we don't have to worry about this. It's the |
| responsibility of the control plane implementation in userspace to |
| implement that. |
| |
| == IPv6 == |
| |
| The 3GPP specifications indicate either IPv4 or IPv6 can be used both |
| on the inner (user) IP layer, or on the outer (transport) layer. |
| |
| Unfortunately, the Kernel module currently supports IPv6 neither for |
| the User IP payload, nor for the outer IP layer. Patches or other |
| Contributions to fix this are most welcome! |
| |
| == Mailing List == |
| |
| If yo have questions regarding how to use the Kernel GTP module from |
| your own software, or want to contribute to the code, please use the |
| osmocom-net-grps mailing list for related discussion. The list can be |
| reached at osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org and the mailman |
| interface for managing your subscription is at |
| https://lists.osmocom.org/mailman/listinfo/osmocom-net-gprs |
| |
| == Issue Tracker == |
| |
| The Osmocom project maintains an issue tracker for the Kernel GTP-U |
| module at |
| https://osmocom.org/projects/linux-kernel-gtp-u/issues |
| |
| == History / Acknowledgements == |
| |
| The Module was originally created in 2012 by Harald Welte, but never |
| completed. Pablo came in to finish the mess Harald left behind. But |
| doe to a lack of user interest, it never got merged. |
| |
| In 2015, Andreas Schultz came to the rescue and fixed lots more bugs, |
| extended it with new features and finally pushed all of us to get it |
| mainline, where it was merged in 4.7.0. |
| |
| == Architectural Details == |
| |
| === Local GTP-U entity and tunnel identification === |
| |
| GTP-U uses UDP for transporting PDU's. The receiving UDP port is 2152 |
| for GTPv1-U and 3386 for GTPv0-U. |
| |
| There is only one GTP-U entity (and therefor SGSN/GGSN/S-GW/PDN-GW |
| instance) per IP address. Tunnel Endpoint Identifier (TEID) are unique |
| per GTP-U entity. |
| |
| A specific tunnel is only defined by the destination entity. Since the |
| destination port is constant, only the destination IP and TEID define |
| a tunnel. The source IP and Port have no meaning for the tunnel. |
| |
| Therefore: |
| |
| * when sending, the remote entity is defined by the remote IP and |
| the tunnel endpoint id. The source IP and port have no meaning and |
| can be changed at any time. |
| |
| * when receiving the local entity is defined by the local |
| destination IP and the tunnel endpoint id. The source IP and port |
| have no meaning and can change at any time. |
| |
| [3GPP TS 29.281] Section 4.3.0 defines this so: |
| |
| > The TEID in the GTP-U header is used to de-multiplex traffic |
| > incoming from remote tunnel endpoints so that it is delivered to the |
| > User plane entities in a way that allows multiplexing of different |
| > users, different packet protocols and different QoS levels. |
| > Therefore no two remote GTP-U endpoints shall send traffic to a |
| > GTP-U protocol entity using the same TEID value except |
| > for data forwarding as part of mobility procedures. |
| |
| The definition above only defines that two remote GTP-U endpoints |
| *should not* send to the same TEID, it *does not* forbid or exclude |
| such a scenario. In fact, the mentioned mobility procedures make it |
| necessary that the GTP-U entity accepts traffic for TEIDs from |
| multiple or unknown peers. |
| |
| Therefore, the receiving side identifies tunnels exclusively based on |
| TEIDs, not based on the source IP! |
| |
| == APN vs. Network Device == |
| |
| The GTP-U driver creates a Linux network device for each Gi/SGi |
| interface. |
| |
| [3GPP TS 29.281] calls the Gi/SGi reference point an interface. This |
| may lead to the impression that the GGSN/P-GW can have only one such |
| interface. |
| |
| Correct is that the Gi/SGi reference point defines the interworking |
| between +the 3GPP packet domain (PDN) based on GTP-U tunnel and IP |
| based networks. |
| |
| There is no provision in any of the 3GPP documents that limits the |
| number of Gi/SGi interfaces implemented by a GGSN/P-GW. |
| |
| [3GPP TS 29.061] Section 11.3 makes it clear that the selection of a |
| specific Gi/SGi interfaces is made through the Access Point Name |
| (APN): |
| |
| > 2. each private network manages its own addressing. In general this |
| > will result in different private networks having overlapping |
| > address ranges. A logically separate connection (e.g. an IP in IP |
| > tunnel or layer 2 virtual circuit) is used between the GGSN/P-GW |
| > and each private network. |
| > |
| > In this case the IP address alone is not necessarily unique. The |
| > pair of values, Access Point Name (APN) and IPv4 address and/or |
| > IPv6 prefixes, is unique. |
| |
| In order to support the overlapping address range use case, each APN |
| is mapped to a separate Gi/SGi interface (network device). |
| |
| NOTE: The Access Point Name is purely a control plane (GTP-C) concept. |
| At the GTP-U level, only Tunnel Endpoint Identifiers are present in |
| GTP-U packets and network devices are known |
| |
| Therefore for a given UE the mapping in IP to PDN network is: |
| * network device + MS IP -> Peer IP + Peer TEID, |
| |
| and from PDN to IP network: |
| * local GTP-U IP + TEID -> network device |
| |
| Furthermore, before a received T-PDU is injected into the network |
| device the MS IP is checked against the IP recorded in PDP context. |