| .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 | |
| ============================================= | |
| Open vSwitch datapath developer documentation | |
| ============================================= | |
| The Open vSwitch kernel module allows flexible userspace control over | |
| flow-level packet processing on selected network devices. It can be | |
| used to implement a plain Ethernet switch, network device bonding, | |
| VLAN processing, network access control, flow-based network control, | |
| and so on. | |
| The kernel module implements multiple "datapaths" (analogous to | |
| bridges), each of which can have multiple "vports" (analogous to ports | |
| within a bridge). Each datapath also has associated with it a "flow | |
| table" that userspace populates with "flows" that map from keys based | |
| on packet headers and metadata to sets of actions. The most common | |
| action forwards the packet to another vport; other actions are also | |
| implemented. | |
| When a packet arrives on a vport, the kernel module processes it by | |
| extracting its flow key and looking it up in the flow table. If there | |
| is a matching flow, it executes the associated actions. If there is | |
| no match, it queues the packet to userspace for processing (as part of | |
| its processing, userspace will likely set up a flow to handle further | |
| packets of the same type entirely in-kernel). | |
| Flow key compatibility | |
| ---------------------- | |
| Network protocols evolve over time. New protocols become important | |
| and existing protocols lose their prominence. For the Open vSwitch | |
| kernel module to remain relevant, it must be possible for newer | |
| versions to parse additional protocols as part of the flow key. It | |
| might even be desirable, someday, to drop support for parsing | |
| protocols that have become obsolete. Therefore, the Netlink interface | |
| to Open vSwitch is designed to allow carefully written userspace | |
| applications to work with any version of the flow key, past or future. | |
| To support this forward and backward compatibility, whenever the | |
| kernel module passes a packet to userspace, it also passes along the | |
| flow key that it parsed from the packet. Userspace then extracts its | |
| own notion of a flow key from the packet and compares it against the | |
| kernel-provided version: | |
| - If userspace's notion of the flow key for the packet matches the | |
| kernel's, then nothing special is necessary. | |
| - If the kernel's flow key includes more fields than the userspace | |
| version of the flow key, for example if the kernel decoded IPv6 | |
| headers but userspace stopped at the Ethernet type (because it | |
| does not understand IPv6), then again nothing special is | |
| necessary. Userspace can still set up a flow in the usual way, | |
| as long as it uses the kernel-provided flow key to do it. | |
| - If the userspace flow key includes more fields than the | |
| kernel's, for example if userspace decoded an IPv6 header but | |
| the kernel stopped at the Ethernet type, then userspace can | |
| forward the packet manually, without setting up a flow in the | |
| kernel. This case is bad for performance because every packet | |
| that the kernel considers part of the flow must go to userspace, | |
| but the forwarding behavior is correct. (If userspace can | |
| determine that the values of the extra fields would not affect | |
| forwarding behavior, then it could set up a flow anyway.) | |
| How flow keys evolve over time is important to making this work, so | |
| the following sections go into detail. | |
| Flow key format | |
| --------------- | |
| A flow key is passed over a Netlink socket as a sequence of Netlink | |
| attributes. Some attributes represent packet metadata, defined as any | |
| information about a packet that cannot be extracted from the packet | |
| itself, e.g. the vport on which the packet was received. Most | |
| attributes, however, are extracted from headers within the packet, | |
| e.g. source and destination addresses from Ethernet, IP, or TCP | |
| headers. | |
| The <linux/openvswitch.h> header file defines the exact format of the | |
| flow key attributes. For informal explanatory purposes here, we write | |
| them as comma-separated strings, with parentheses indicating arguments | |
| and nesting. For example, the following could represent a flow key | |
| corresponding to a TCP packet that arrived on vport 1:: | |
| in_port(1), eth(src=e0:91:f5:21:d0:b2, dst=00:02:e3:0f:80:a4), | |
| eth_type(0x0800), ipv4(src=172.16.0.20, dst=172.18.0.52, proto=17, tos=0, | |
| frag=no), tcp(src=49163, dst=80) | |
| Often we ellipsize arguments not important to the discussion, e.g.:: | |
| in_port(1), eth(...), eth_type(0x0800), ipv4(...), tcp(...) | |
| Wildcarded flow key format | |
| -------------------------- | |
| A wildcarded flow is described with two sequences of Netlink attributes | |
| passed over the Netlink socket. A flow key, exactly as described above, and an | |
| optional corresponding flow mask. | |
| A wildcarded flow can represent a group of exact match flows. Each '1' bit | |
| in the mask specifies a exact match with the corresponding bit in the flow key. | |
| A '0' bit specifies a don't care bit, which will match either a '1' or '0' bit | |
| of a incoming packet. Using wildcarded flow can improve the flow set up rate | |
| by reduce the number of new flows need to be processed by the user space program. | |
| Support for the mask Netlink attribute is optional for both the kernel and user | |
| space program. The kernel can ignore the mask attribute, installing an exact | |
| match flow, or reduce the number of don't care bits in the kernel to less than | |
| what was specified by the user space program. In this case, variations in bits | |
| that the kernel does not implement will simply result in additional flow setups. | |
| The kernel module will also work with user space programs that neither support | |
| nor supply flow mask attributes. | |
| Since the kernel may ignore or modify wildcard bits, it can be difficult for | |
| the userspace program to know exactly what matches are installed. There are | |
| two possible approaches: reactively install flows as they miss the kernel | |
| flow table (and therefore not attempt to determine wildcard changes at all) | |
| or use the kernel's response messages to determine the installed wildcards. | |
| When interacting with userspace, the kernel should maintain the match portion | |
| of the key exactly as originally installed. This will provides a handle to | |
| identify the flow for all future operations. However, when reporting the | |
| mask of an installed flow, the mask should include any restrictions imposed | |
| by the kernel. | |
| The behavior when using overlapping wildcarded flows is undefined. It is the | |
| responsibility of the user space program to ensure that any incoming packet | |
| can match at most one flow, wildcarded or not. The current implementation | |
| performs best-effort detection of overlapping wildcarded flows and may reject | |
| some but not all of them. However, this behavior may change in future versions. | |
| Unique flow identifiers | |
| ----------------------- | |
| An alternative to using the original match portion of a key as the handle for | |
| flow identification is a unique flow identifier, or "UFID". UFIDs are optional | |
| for both the kernel and user space program. | |
| User space programs that support UFID are expected to provide it during flow | |
| setup in addition to the flow, then refer to the flow using the UFID for all | |
| future operations. The kernel is not required to index flows by the original | |
| flow key if a UFID is specified. | |
| Basic rule for evolving flow keys | |
| --------------------------------- | |
| Some care is needed to really maintain forward and backward | |
| compatibility for applications that follow the rules listed under | |
| "Flow key compatibility" above. | |
| The basic rule is obvious:: | |
| ================================================================== | |
| New network protocol support must only supplement existing flow | |
| key attributes. It must not change the meaning of already defined | |
| flow key attributes. | |
| ================================================================== | |
| This rule does have less-obvious consequences so it is worth working | |
| through a few examples. Suppose, for example, that the kernel module | |
| did not already implement VLAN parsing. Instead, it just interpreted | |
| the 802.1Q TPID (0x8100) as the Ethertype then stopped parsing the | |
| packet. The flow key for any packet with an 802.1Q header would look | |
| essentially like this, ignoring metadata:: | |
| eth(...), eth_type(0x8100) | |
| Naively, to add VLAN support, it makes sense to add a new "vlan" flow | |
| key attribute to contain the VLAN tag, then continue to decode the | |
| encapsulated headers beyond the VLAN tag using the existing field | |
| definitions. With this change, a TCP packet in VLAN 10 would have a | |
| flow key much like this:: | |
| eth(...), vlan(vid=10, pcp=0), eth_type(0x0800), ip(proto=6, ...), tcp(...) | |
| But this change would negatively affect a userspace application that | |
| has not been updated to understand the new "vlan" flow key attribute. | |
| The application could, following the flow compatibility rules above, | |
| ignore the "vlan" attribute that it does not understand and therefore | |
| assume that the flow contained IP packets. This is a bad assumption | |
| (the flow only contains IP packets if one parses and skips over the | |
| 802.1Q header) and it could cause the application's behavior to change | |
| across kernel versions even though it follows the compatibility rules. | |
| The solution is to use a set of nested attributes. This is, for | |
| example, why 802.1Q support uses nested attributes. A TCP packet in | |
| VLAN 10 is actually expressed as:: | |
| eth(...), eth_type(0x8100), vlan(vid=10, pcp=0), encap(eth_type(0x0800), | |
| ip(proto=6, ...), tcp(...))) | |
| Notice how the "eth_type", "ip", and "tcp" flow key attributes are | |
| nested inside the "encap" attribute. Thus, an application that does | |
| not understand the "vlan" key will not see either of those attributes | |
| and therefore will not misinterpret them. (Also, the outer eth_type | |
| is still 0x8100, not changed to 0x0800.) | |
| Handling malformed packets | |
| -------------------------- | |
| Don't drop packets in the kernel for malformed protocol headers, bad | |
| checksums, etc. This would prevent userspace from implementing a | |
| simple Ethernet switch that forwards every packet. | |
| Instead, in such a case, include an attribute with "empty" content. | |
| It doesn't matter if the empty content could be valid protocol values, | |
| as long as those values are rarely seen in practice, because userspace | |
| can always forward all packets with those values to userspace and | |
| handle them individually. | |
| For example, consider a packet that contains an IP header that | |
| indicates protocol 6 for TCP, but which is truncated just after the IP | |
| header, so that the TCP header is missing. The flow key for this | |
| packet would include a tcp attribute with all-zero src and dst, like | |
| this:: | |
| eth(...), eth_type(0x0800), ip(proto=6, ...), tcp(src=0, dst=0) | |
| As another example, consider a packet with an Ethernet type of 0x8100, | |
| indicating that a VLAN TCI should follow, but which is truncated just | |
| after the Ethernet type. The flow key for this packet would include | |
| an all-zero-bits vlan and an empty encap attribute, like this:: | |
| eth(...), eth_type(0x8100), vlan(0), encap() | |
| Unlike a TCP packet with source and destination ports 0, an | |
| all-zero-bits VLAN TCI is not that rare, so the CFI bit (aka | |
| VLAN_TAG_PRESENT inside the kernel) is ordinarily set in a vlan | |
| attribute expressly to allow this situation to be distinguished. | |
| Thus, the flow key in this second example unambiguously indicates a | |
| missing or malformed VLAN TCI. | |
| Other rules | |
| ----------- | |
| The other rules for flow keys are much less subtle: | |
| - Duplicate attributes are not allowed at a given nesting level. | |
| - Ordering of attributes is not significant. | |
| - When the kernel sends a given flow key to userspace, it always | |
| composes it the same way. This allows userspace to hash and | |
| compare entire flow keys that it may not be able to fully | |
| interpret. |