blob: 4d33f310b653f543059754b4216febc9f57d19cd [file] [log] [blame]
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
/*
* Copyright © 2022 Intel Corporation
*/
#ifndef _XE_VM_DOC_H_
#define _XE_VM_DOC_H_
/**
* DOC: XE VM (user address space)
*
* VM creation
* ===========
*
* Allocate a physical page for root of the page table structure, create default
* bind engine, and return a handle to the user.
*
* Scratch page
* ------------
*
* If the VM is created with the flag, DRM_XE_VM_CREATE_FLAG_SCRATCH_PAGE, set the
* entire page table structure defaults pointing to blank page allocated by the
* VM. Invalid memory access rather than fault just read / write to this page.
*
* VM bind (create GPU mapping for a BO or userptr)
* ================================================
*
* Creates GPU mappings for a BO or userptr within a VM. VM binds uses the same
* in / out fence interface (struct drm_xe_sync) as execs which allows users to
* think of binds and execs as more or less the same operation.
*
* Operations
* ----------
*
* DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_MAP - Create mapping for a BO
* DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_UNMAP - Destroy mapping for a BO / userptr
* DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_MAP_USERPTR - Create mapping for userptr
*
* Implementation details
* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*
* All bind operations are implemented via a hybrid approach of using the CPU
* and GPU to modify page tables. If a new physical page is allocated in the
* page table structure we populate that page via the CPU and insert that new
* page into the existing page table structure via a GPU job. Also any existing
* pages in the page table structure that need to be modified also are updated
* via the GPU job. As the root physical page is prealloced on VM creation our
* GPU job will always have at least 1 update. The in / out fences are passed to
* this job so again this is conceptually the same as an exec.
*
* Very simple example of few binds on an empty VM with 48 bits of address space
* and the resulting operations:
*
* .. code-block::
*
* bind BO0 0x0-0x1000
* alloc page level 3a, program PTE[0] to BO0 phys address (CPU)
* alloc page level 2, program PDE[0] page level 3a phys address (CPU)
* alloc page level 1, program PDE[0] page level 2 phys address (CPU)
* update root PDE[0] to page level 1 phys address (GPU)
*
* bind BO1 0x201000-0x202000
* alloc page level 3b, program PTE[1] to BO1 phys address (CPU)
* update page level 2 PDE[1] to page level 3b phys address (GPU)
*
* bind BO2 0x1ff000-0x201000
* update page level 3a PTE[511] to BO2 phys addres (GPU)
* update page level 3b PTE[0] to BO2 phys addres + 0x1000 (GPU)
*
* GPU bypass
* ~~~~~~~~~~
*
* In the above example the steps using the GPU can be converted to CPU if the
* bind can be done immediately (all in-fences satisfied, VM dma-resv kernel
* slot is idle).
*
* Address space
* -------------
*
* Depending on platform either 48 or 57 bits of address space is supported.
*
* Page sizes
* ----------
*
* The minimum page size is either 4k or 64k depending on platform and memory
* placement (sysmem vs. VRAM). We enforce that binds must be aligned to the
* minimum page size.
*
* Larger pages (2M or 1GB) can be used for BOs in VRAM, the BO physical address
* is aligned to the larger pages size, and VA is aligned to the larger page
* size. Larger pages for userptrs / BOs in sysmem should be possible but is not
* yet implemented.
*
* Sync error handling mode
* ------------------------
*
* In both modes during the bind IOCTL the user input is validated. In sync
* error handling mode the newly bound BO is validated (potentially moved back
* to a region of memory where is can be used), page tables are updated by the
* CPU and the job to do the GPU binds is created in the IOCTL itself. This step
* can fail due to memory pressure. The user can recover by freeing memory and
* trying this operation again.
*
* Async error handling mode
* -------------------------
*
* In async error handling the step of validating the BO, updating page tables,
* and generating a job are deferred to an async worker. As this step can now
* fail after the IOCTL has reported success we need an error handling flow for
* which the user can recover from.
*
* The solution is for a user to register a user address with the VM which the
* VM uses to report errors to. The ufence wait interface can be used to wait on
* a VM going into an error state. Once an error is reported the VM's async
* worker is paused. While the VM's async worker is paused sync,
* DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_UNMAP operations are allowed (this can free memory). Once the
* uses believe the error state is fixed, the async worker can be resumed via
* XE_VM_BIND_OP_RESTART operation. When VM async bind work is restarted, the
* first operation processed is the operation that caused the original error.
*
* Bind queues / engines
* ---------------------
*
* Think of the case where we have two bind operations A + B and are submitted
* in that order. A has in fences while B has none. If using a single bind
* queue, B is now blocked on A's in fences even though it is ready to run. This
* example is a real use case for VK sparse binding. We work around this
* limitation by implementing bind engines.
*
* In the bind IOCTL the user can optionally pass in an engine ID which must map
* to an engine which is of the special class DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VM_BIND.
* Underneath this is a really virtual engine that can run on any of the copy
* hardware engines. The job(s) created each IOCTL are inserted into this
* engine's ring. In the example above if A and B have different bind engines B
* is free to pass A. If the engine ID field is omitted, the default bind queue
* for the VM is used.
*
* TODO: Explain race in issue 41 and how we solve it
*
* Array of bind operations
* ------------------------
*
* The uAPI allows multiple binds operations to be passed in via a user array,
* of struct drm_xe_vm_bind_op, in a single VM bind IOCTL. This interface
* matches the VK sparse binding API. The implementation is rather simple, parse
* the array into a list of operations, pass the in fences to the first operation,
* and pass the out fences to the last operation. The ordered nature of a bind
* engine makes this possible.
*
* Munmap semantics for unbinds
* ----------------------------
*
* Munmap allows things like:
*
* .. code-block::
*
* 0x0000-0x2000 and 0x3000-0x5000 have mappings
* Munmap 0x1000-0x4000, results in mappings 0x0000-0x1000 and 0x4000-0x5000
*
* To support this semantic in the above example we decompose the above example
* into 4 operations:
*
* .. code-block::
*
* unbind 0x0000-0x2000
* unbind 0x3000-0x5000
* rebind 0x0000-0x1000
* rebind 0x4000-0x5000
*
* Why not just do a partial unbind of 0x1000-0x2000 and 0x3000-0x4000? This
* falls apart when using large pages at the edges and the unbind forces us to
* use a smaller page size. For simplity we always issue a set of unbinds
* unmapping anything in the range and at most 2 rebinds on the edges.
*
* Similar to an array of binds, in fences are passed to the first operation and
* out fences are signaled on the last operation.
*
* In this example there is a window of time where 0x0000-0x1000 and
* 0x4000-0x5000 are invalid but the user didn't ask for these addresses to be
* removed from the mapping. To work around this we treat any munmap style
* unbinds which require a rebind as a kernel operations (BO eviction or userptr
* invalidation). The first operation waits on the VM's
* DMA_RESV_USAGE_PREEMPT_FENCE slots (waits for all pending jobs on VM to
* complete / triggers preempt fences) and the last operation is installed in
* the VM's DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL slot (blocks future jobs / resume compute mode
* VM). The caveat is all dma-resv slots must be updated atomically with respect
* to execs and compute mode rebind worker. To accomplish this, hold the
* vm->lock in write mode from the first operation until the last.
*
* Deferred binds in fault mode
* ----------------------------
*
* If a VM is in fault mode (TODO: link to fault mode), new bind operations that
* create mappings are by default deferred to the page fault handler (first
* use). This behavior can be overriden by setting the flag
* DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_IMMEDIATE which indicates to creating the mapping
* immediately.
*
* User pointer
* ============
*
* User pointers are user allocated memory (malloc'd, mmap'd, etc..) for which the
* user wants to create a GPU mapping. Typically in other DRM drivers a dummy BO
* was created and then a binding was created. We bypass creating a dummy BO in
* XE and simply create a binding directly from the userptr.
*
* Invalidation
* ------------
*
* Since this a core kernel managed memory the kernel can move this memory
* whenever it wants. We register an invalidation MMU notifier to alert XE when
* a user poiter is about to move. The invalidation notifier needs to block
* until all pending users (jobs or compute mode engines) of the userptr are
* idle to ensure no faults. This done by waiting on all of VM's dma-resv slots.
*
* Rebinds
* -------
*
* Either the next exec (non-compute) or rebind worker (compute mode) will
* rebind the userptr. The invalidation MMU notifier kicks the rebind worker
* after the VM dma-resv wait if the VM is in compute mode.
*
* Compute mode
* ============
*
* A VM in compute mode enables long running workloads and ultra low latency
* submission (ULLS). ULLS is implemented via a continuously running batch +
* semaphores. This enables the user to insert jump to new batch commands
* into the continuously running batch. In both cases these batches exceed the
* time a dma fence is allowed to exist for before signaling, as such dma fences
* are not used when a VM is in compute mode. User fences (TODO: link user fence
* doc) are used instead to signal operation's completion.
*
* Preempt fences
* --------------
*
* If the kernel decides to move memory around (either userptr invalidate, BO
* eviction, or mumap style unbind which results in a rebind) and a batch is
* running on an engine, that batch can fault or cause a memory corruption as
* page tables for the moved memory are no longer valid. To work around this we
* introduce the concept of preempt fences. When sw signaling is enabled on a
* preempt fence it tells the submission backend to kick that engine off the
* hardware and the preempt fence signals when the engine is off the hardware.
* Once all preempt fences are signaled for a VM the kernel can safely move the
* memory and kick the rebind worker which resumes all the engines execution.
*
* A preempt fence, for every engine using the VM, is installed into the VM's
* dma-resv DMA_RESV_USAGE_PREEMPT_FENCE slot. The same preempt fence, for every
* engine using the VM, is also installed into the same dma-resv slot of every
* external BO mapped in the VM.
*
* Rebind worker
* -------------
*
* The rebind worker is very similar to an exec. It is resposible for rebinding
* evicted BOs or userptrs, waiting on those operations, installing new preempt
* fences, and finally resuming executing of engines in the VM.
*
* Flow
* ~~~~
*
* .. code-block::
*
* <----------------------------------------------------------------------|
* Check if VM is closed, if so bail out |
* Lock VM global lock in read mode |
* Pin userptrs (also finds userptr invalidated since last rebind worker) |
* Lock VM dma-resv and external BOs dma-resv |
* Validate BOs that have been evicted |
* Wait on and allocate new preempt fences for every engine using the VM |
* Rebind invalidated userptrs + evicted BOs |
* Wait on last rebind fence |
* Wait VM's DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL dma-resv slot |
* Install preeempt fences and issue resume for every engine using the VM |
* Check if any userptrs invalidated since pin |
* Squash resume for all engines |
* Unlock all |
* Wait all VM's dma-resv slots |
* Retry ----------------------------------------------------------
* Release all engines waiting to resume
* Unlock all
*
* Timeslicing
* -----------
*
* In order to prevent an engine from continuously being kicked off the hardware
* and making no forward progress an engine has a period of time it allowed to
* run after resume before it can be kicked off again. This effectively gives
* each engine a timeslice.
*
* Handling multiple GTs
* =====================
*
* If a GT has slower access to some regions and the page table structure are in
* the slow region, the performance on that GT could adversely be affected. To
* work around this we allow a VM page tables to be shadowed in multiple GTs.
* When VM is created, a default bind engine and PT table structure are created
* on each GT.
*
* Binds can optionally pass in a mask of GTs where a mapping should be created,
* if this mask is zero then default to all the GTs where the VM has page
* tables.
*
* The implementation for this breaks down into a bunch for_each_gt loops in
* various places plus exporting a composite fence for multi-GT binds to the
* user.
*
* Fault mode (unified shared memory)
* ==================================
*
* A VM in fault mode can be enabled on devices that support page faults. If
* page faults are enabled, using dma fences can potentially induce a deadlock:
* A pending page fault can hold up the GPU work which holds up the dma fence
* signaling, and memory allocation is usually required to resolve a page
* fault, but memory allocation is not allowed to gate dma fence signaling. As
* such, dma fences are not allowed when VM is in fault mode. Because dma-fences
* are not allowed, only long running workloads and ULLS are enabled on a faulting
* VM.
*
* Defered VM binds
* ----------------
*
* By default, on a faulting VM binds just allocate the VMA and the actual
* updating of the page tables is defered to the page fault handler. This
* behavior can be overridden by setting the flag DRM_XE_VM_BIND_FLAG_IMMEDIATE in
* the VM bind which will then do the bind immediately.
*
* Page fault handler
* ------------------
*
* Page faults are received in the G2H worker under the CT lock which is in the
* path of dma fences (no memory allocations are allowed, faults require memory
* allocations) thus we cannot process faults under the CT lock. Another issue
* is faults issue TLB invalidations which require G2H credits and we cannot
* allocate G2H credits in the G2H handlers without deadlocking. Lastly, we do
* not want the CT lock to be an outer lock of the VM global lock (VM global
* lock required to fault processing).
*
* To work around the above issue with processing faults in the G2H worker, we
* sink faults to a buffer which is large enough to sink all possible faults on
* the GT (1 per hardware engine) and kick a worker to process the faults. Since
* the page faults G2H are already received in a worker, kicking another worker
* adds more latency to a critical performance path. We add a fast path in the
* G2H irq handler which looks at first G2H and if it is a page fault we sink
* the fault to the buffer and kick the worker to process the fault. TLB
* invalidation responses are also in the critical path so these can also be
* processed in this fast path.
*
* Multiple buffers and workers are used and hashed over based on the ASID so
* faults from different VMs can be processed in parallel.
*
* The page fault handler itself is rather simple, flow is below.
*
* .. code-block::
*
* Lookup VM from ASID in page fault G2H
* Lock VM global lock in read mode
* Lookup VMA from address in page fault G2H
* Check if VMA is valid, if not bail
* Check if VMA's BO has backing store, if not allocate
* <----------------------------------------------------------------------|
* If userptr, pin pages |
* Lock VM & BO dma-resv locks |
* If atomic fault, migrate to VRAM, else validate BO location |
* Issue rebind |
* Wait on rebind to complete |
* Check if userptr invalidated since pin |
* Drop VM & BO dma-resv locks |
* Retry ----------------------------------------------------------
* Unlock all
* Issue blocking TLB invalidation |
* Send page fault response to GuC
*
* Access counters
* ---------------
*
* Access counters can be configured to trigger a G2H indicating the device is
* accessing VMAs in system memory frequently as hint to migrate those VMAs to
* VRAM.
*
* Same as the page fault handler, access counters G2H cannot be processed the
* G2H worker under the CT lock. Again we use a buffer to sink access counter
* G2H. Unlike page faults there is no upper bound so if the buffer is full we
* simply drop the G2H. Access counters are a best case optimization and it is
* safe to drop these unlike page faults.
*
* The access counter handler itself is rather simple flow is below.
*
* .. code-block::
*
* Lookup VM from ASID in access counter G2H
* Lock VM global lock in read mode
* Lookup VMA from address in access counter G2H
* If userptr, bail nothing to do
* Lock VM & BO dma-resv locks
* Issue migration to VRAM
* Unlock all
*
* Notice no rebind is issued in the access counter handler as the rebind will
* be issued on next page fault.
*
* Caveats with eviction / user pointer invalidation
* -------------------------------------------------
*
* In the case of eviction and user pointer invalidation on a faulting VM, there
* is no need to issue a rebind rather we just need to blow away the page tables
* for the VMAs and the page fault handler will rebind the VMAs when they fault.
* The caveat is to update / read the page table structure the VM global lock is
* needed. In both the case of eviction and user pointer invalidation locks are
* held which make acquiring the VM global lock impossible. To work around this
* every VMA maintains a list of leaf page table entries which should be written
* to zero to blow away the VMA's page tables. After writing zero to these
* entries a blocking TLB invalidate is issued. At this point it is safe for the
* kernel to move the VMA's memory around. This is a necessary lockless
* algorithm and is safe as leafs cannot be changed while either an eviction or
* userptr invalidation is occurring.
*
* Locking
* =======
*
* VM locking protects all of the core data paths (bind operations, execs,
* evictions, and compute mode rebind worker) in XE.
*
* Locks
* -----
*
* VM global lock (vm->lock) - rw semaphore lock. Outer most lock which protects
* the list of userptrs mapped in the VM, the list of engines using this VM, and
* the array of external BOs mapped in the VM. When adding or removing any of the
* aforementioned state from the VM should acquire this lock in write mode. The VM
* bind path also acquires this lock in write while the exec / compute mode
* rebind worker acquires this lock in read mode.
*
* VM dma-resv lock (vm->ttm.base.resv->lock) - WW lock. Protects VM dma-resv
* slots which is shared with any private BO in the VM. Expected to be acquired
* during VM binds, execs, and compute mode rebind worker. This lock is also
* held when private BOs are being evicted.
*
* external BO dma-resv lock (bo->ttm.base.resv->lock) - WW lock. Protects
* external BO dma-resv slots. Expected to be acquired during VM binds (in
* addition to the VM dma-resv lock). All external BO dma-locks within a VM are
* expected to be acquired (in addition to the VM dma-resv lock) during execs
* and the compute mode rebind worker. This lock is also held when an external
* BO is being evicted.
*
* Putting it all together
* -----------------------
*
* 1. An exec and bind operation with the same VM can't be executing at the same
* time (vm->lock).
*
* 2. A compute mode rebind worker and bind operation with the same VM can't be
* executing at the same time (vm->lock).
*
* 3. We can't add / remove userptrs or external BOs to a VM while an exec with
* the same VM is executing (vm->lock).
*
* 4. We can't add / remove userptrs, external BOs, or engines to a VM while a
* compute mode rebind worker with the same VM is executing (vm->lock).
*
* 5. Evictions within a VM can't be happen while an exec with the same VM is
* executing (dma-resv locks).
*
* 6. Evictions within a VM can't be happen while a compute mode rebind worker
* with the same VM is executing (dma-resv locks).
*
* dma-resv usage
* ==============
*
* As previously stated to enforce the ordering of kernel ops (eviction, userptr
* invalidation, munmap style unbinds which result in a rebind), rebinds during
* execs, execs, and resumes in the rebind worker we use both the VMs and
* external BOs dma-resv slots. Let try to make this as clear as possible.
*
* Slot installation
* -----------------
*
* 1. Jobs from kernel ops install themselves into the DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL
* slot of either an external BO or VM (depends on if kernel op is operating on
* an external or private BO)
*
* 2. In non-compute mode, jobs from execs install themselves into the
* DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP slot of the VM
*
* 3. In non-compute mode, jobs from execs install themselves into the
* DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE slot of all external BOs in the VM
*
* 4. Jobs from binds install themselves into the DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP slot
* of the VM
*
* 5. Jobs from binds install themselves into the DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP slot
* of the external BO (if the bind is to an external BO, this is addition to #4)
*
* 6. Every engine using a compute mode VM has a preempt fence in installed into
* the DMA_RESV_USAGE_PREEMPT_FENCE slot of the VM
*
* 7. Every engine using a compute mode VM has a preempt fence in installed into
* the DMA_RESV_USAGE_PREEMPT_FENCE slot of all the external BOs in the VM
*
* Slot waiting
* ------------
*
* 1. The exection of all jobs from kernel ops shall wait on all slots
* (DMA_RESV_USAGE_PREEMPT_FENCE) of either an external BO or VM (depends on if
* kernel op is operating on external or private BO)
*
* 2. In non-compute mode, the exection of all jobs from rebinds in execs shall
* wait on the DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL slot of either an external BO or VM
* (depends on if the rebind is operatiing on an external or private BO)
*
* 3. In non-compute mode, the exection of all jobs from execs shall wait on the
* last rebind job
*
* 4. In compute mode, the exection of all jobs from rebinds in the rebind
* worker shall wait on the DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL slot of either an external BO
* or VM (depends on if rebind is operating on external or private BO)
*
* 5. In compute mode, resumes in rebind worker shall wait on last rebind fence
*
* 6. In compute mode, resumes in rebind worker shall wait on the
* DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL slot of the VM
*
* Putting it all together
* -----------------------
*
* 1. New jobs from kernel ops are blocked behind any existing jobs from
* non-compute mode execs
*
* 2. New jobs from non-compute mode execs are blocked behind any existing jobs
* from kernel ops and rebinds
*
* 3. New jobs from kernel ops are blocked behind all preempt fences signaling in
* compute mode
*
* 4. Compute mode engine resumes are blocked behind any existing jobs from
* kernel ops and rebinds
*
* Future work
* ===========
*
* Support large pages for sysmem and userptr.
*
* Update page faults to handle BOs are page level grainularity (e.g. part of BO
* could be in system memory while another part could be in VRAM).
*
* Page fault handler likely we be optimized a bit more (e.g. Rebinds always
* wait on the dma-resv kernel slots of VM or BO, technically we only have to
* wait the BO moving. If using a job to do the rebind, we could not block in
* the page fault handler rather attach a callback to fence of the rebind job to
* signal page fault complete. Our handling of short circuting for atomic faults
* for bound VMAs could be better. etc...). We can tune all of this once we have
* benchmarks / performance number from workloads up and running.
*/
#endif