| Device tree bindings for GPMC connected NANDs |
| |
| GPMC connected NAND (found on OMAP boards) are represented as child nodes of |
| the GPMC controller with a name of "nand". |
| |
| All timing relevant properties as well as generic gpmc child properties are |
| explained in a separate documents - please refer to |
| Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/ti-gpmc.txt |
| |
| For NAND specific properties such as ECC modes or bus width, please refer to |
| Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt |
| |
| |
| Required properties: |
| |
| - reg: The CS line the peripheral is connected to |
| |
| Optional properties: |
| |
| - nand-bus-width: Set this numeric value to 16 if the hardware |
| is wired that way. If not specified, a bus |
| width of 8 is assumed. |
| |
| - ti,nand-ecc-opt: A string setting the ECC layout to use. One of: |
| "sw" <deprecated> use "ham1" instead |
| "hw" <deprecated> use "ham1" instead |
| "hw-romcode" <deprecated> use "ham1" instead |
| "ham1" 1-bit Hamming ecc code |
| "bch4" 4-bit BCH ecc code |
| "bch8" 8-bit BCH ecc code |
| "bch16" 16-bit BCH ECC code |
| Refer below "How to select correct ECC scheme for your device ?" |
| |
| - ti,nand-xfer-type: A string setting the data transfer type. One of: |
| |
| "prefetch-polled" Prefetch polled mode (default) |
| "polled" Polled mode, without prefetch |
| "prefetch-dma" Prefetch enabled sDMA mode |
| "prefetch-irq" Prefetch enabled irq mode |
| |
| - elm_id: <deprecated> use "ti,elm-id" instead |
| - ti,elm-id: Specifies phandle of the ELM devicetree node. |
| ELM is an on-chip hardware engine on TI SoC which is used for |
| locating ECC errors for BCHx algorithms. SoC devices which have |
| ELM hardware engines should specify this device node in .dtsi |
| Using ELM for ECC error correction frees some CPU cycles. |
| |
| For inline partition table parsing (optional): |
| |
| - #address-cells: should be set to 1 |
| - #size-cells: should be set to 1 |
| |
| Example for an AM33xx board: |
| |
| gpmc: gpmc@50000000 { |
| compatible = "ti,am3352-gpmc"; |
| ti,hwmods = "gpmc"; |
| reg = <0x50000000 0x1000000>; |
| interrupts = <100>; |
| gpmc,num-cs = <8>; |
| gpmc,num-waitpins = <2>; |
| #address-cells = <2>; |
| #size-cells = <1>; |
| ranges = <0 0 0x08000000 0x2000>; /* CS0: NAND */ |
| elm_id = <&elm>; |
| |
| nand@0,0 { |
| reg = <0 0 0>; /* CS0, offset 0 */ |
| nand-bus-width = <16>; |
| ti,nand-ecc-opt = "bch8"; |
| ti,nand-xfer-type = "polled"; |
| |
| gpmc,sync-clk-ps = <0>; |
| gpmc,cs-on-ns = <0>; |
| gpmc,cs-rd-off-ns = <44>; |
| gpmc,cs-wr-off-ns = <44>; |
| gpmc,adv-on-ns = <6>; |
| gpmc,adv-rd-off-ns = <34>; |
| gpmc,adv-wr-off-ns = <44>; |
| gpmc,we-off-ns = <40>; |
| gpmc,oe-off-ns = <54>; |
| gpmc,access-ns = <64>; |
| gpmc,rd-cycle-ns = <82>; |
| gpmc,wr-cycle-ns = <82>; |
| gpmc,wr-access-ns = <40>; |
| gpmc,wr-data-mux-bus-ns = <0>; |
| |
| #address-cells = <1>; |
| #size-cells = <1>; |
| |
| /* partitions go here */ |
| }; |
| }; |
| |
| How to select correct ECC scheme for your device ? |
| -------------------------------------------------- |
| Higher ECC scheme usually means better protection against bit-flips and |
| increased system lifetime. However, selection of ECC scheme is dependent |
| on various other factors also like; |
| |
| (1) support of built in hardware engines. |
| Some legacy OMAP SoC do not have ELM harware engine, so those SoC cannot |
| support ecc-schemes with hardware error-correction (BCHx_HW). However |
| such SoC can use ecc-schemes with software library for error-correction |
| (BCHx_HW_DETECTION_SW). The error correction capability with software |
| library remains equivalent to their hardware counter-part, but there is |
| slight CPU penalty when too many bit-flips are detected during reads. |
| |
| (2) Device parameters like OOBSIZE. |
| Other factor which governs the selection of ecc-scheme is oob-size. |
| Higher ECC schemes require more OOB/Spare area to store ECC syndrome, |
| so the device should have enough free bytes available its OOB/Spare |
| area to accomodate ECC for entire page. In general following expression |
| helps in determining if given device can accomodate ECC syndrome: |
| "2 + (PAGESIZE / 512) * ECC_BYTES" >= OOBSIZE" |
| where |
| OOBSIZE number of bytes in OOB/spare area |
| PAGESIZE number of bytes in main-area of device page |
| ECC_BYTES number of ECC bytes generated to protect |
| 512 bytes of data, which is: |
| '3' for HAM1_xx ecc schemes |
| '7' for BCH4_xx ecc schemes |
| '14' for BCH8_xx ecc schemes |
| '26' for BCH16_xx ecc schemes |
| |
| Example(a): For a device with PAGESIZE = 2048 and OOBSIZE = 64 and |
| trying to use BCH16 (ECC_BYTES=26) ecc-scheme. |
| Number of ECC bytes per page = (2 + (2048 / 512) * 26) = 106 B |
| which is greater than capacity of NAND device (OOBSIZE=64) |
| Hence, BCH16 cannot be supported on given device. But it can |
| probably use lower ecc-schemes like BCH8. |
| |
| Example(b): For a device with PAGESIZE = 2048 and OOBSIZE = 128 and |
| trying to use BCH16 (ECC_BYTES=26) ecc-scheme. |
| Number of ECC bytes per page = (2 + (2048 / 512) * 26) = 106 B |
| which can be accomodate in the OOB/Spare area of this device |
| (OOBSIZE=128). So this device can use BCH16 ecc-scheme. |