| .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 | 
 |  | 
 | ================================== | 
 | relay interface (formerly relayfs) | 
 | ================================== | 
 |  | 
 | The relay interface provides a means for kernel applications to | 
 | efficiently log and transfer large quantities of data from the kernel | 
 | to userspace via user-defined 'relay channels'. | 
 |  | 
 | A 'relay channel' is a kernel->user data relay mechanism implemented | 
 | as a set of per-cpu kernel buffers ('channel buffers'), each | 
 | represented as a regular file ('relay file') in user space.  Kernel | 
 | clients write into the channel buffers using efficient write | 
 | functions; these automatically log into the current cpu's channel | 
 | buffer.  User space applications mmap() or read() from the relay files | 
 | and retrieve the data as it becomes available.  The relay files | 
 | themselves are files created in a host filesystem, e.g. debugfs, and | 
 | are associated with the channel buffers using the API described below. | 
 |  | 
 | The format of the data logged into the channel buffers is completely | 
 | up to the kernel client; the relay interface does however provide | 
 | hooks which allow kernel clients to impose some structure on the | 
 | buffer data.  The relay interface doesn't implement any form of data | 
 | filtering - this also is left to the kernel client.  The purpose is to | 
 | keep things as simple as possible. | 
 |  | 
 | This document provides an overview of the relay interface API.  The | 
 | details of the function parameters are documented along with the | 
 | functions in the relay interface code - please see that for details. | 
 |  | 
 | Semantics | 
 | ========= | 
 |  | 
 | Each relay channel has one buffer per CPU, each buffer has one or more | 
 | sub-buffers.  Messages are written to the first sub-buffer until it is | 
 | too full to contain a new message, in which case it is written to | 
 | the next (if available).  Messages are never split across sub-buffers. | 
 | At this point, userspace can be notified so it empties the first | 
 | sub-buffer, while the kernel continues writing to the next. | 
 |  | 
 | When notified that a sub-buffer is full, the kernel knows how many | 
 | bytes of it are padding i.e. unused space occurring because a complete | 
 | message couldn't fit into a sub-buffer.  Userspace can use this | 
 | knowledge to copy only valid data. | 
 |  | 
 | After copying it, userspace can notify the kernel that a sub-buffer | 
 | has been consumed. | 
 |  | 
 | A relay channel can operate in a mode where it will overwrite data not | 
 | yet collected by userspace, and not wait for it to be consumed. | 
 |  | 
 | The relay channel itself does not provide for communication of such | 
 | data between userspace and kernel, allowing the kernel side to remain | 
 | simple and not impose a single interface on userspace.  It does | 
 | provide a set of examples and a separate helper though, described | 
 | below. | 
 |  | 
 | The read() interface both removes padding and internally consumes the | 
 | read sub-buffers; thus in cases where read(2) is being used to drain | 
 | the channel buffers, special-purpose communication between kernel and | 
 | user isn't necessary for basic operation. | 
 |  | 
 | One of the major goals of the relay interface is to provide a low | 
 | overhead mechanism for conveying kernel data to userspace.  While the | 
 | read() interface is easy to use, it's not as efficient as the mmap() | 
 | approach; the example code attempts to make the tradeoff between the | 
 | two approaches as small as possible. | 
 |  | 
 | klog and relay-apps example code | 
 | ================================ | 
 |  | 
 | The relay interface itself is ready to use, but to make things easier, | 
 | a couple simple utility functions and a set of examples are provided. | 
 |  | 
 | The relay-apps example tarball, available on the relay sourceforge | 
 | site, contains a set of self-contained examples, each consisting of a | 
 | pair of .c files containing boilerplate code for each of the user and | 
 | kernel sides of a relay application.  When combined these two sets of | 
 | boilerplate code provide glue to easily stream data to disk, without | 
 | having to bother with mundane housekeeping chores. | 
 |  | 
 | The 'klog debugging functions' patch (klog.patch in the relay-apps | 
 | tarball) provides a couple of high-level logging functions to the | 
 | kernel which allow writing formatted text or raw data to a channel, | 
 | regardless of whether a channel to write into exists or not, or even | 
 | whether the relay interface is compiled into the kernel or not.  These | 
 | functions allow you to put unconditional 'trace' statements anywhere | 
 | in the kernel or kernel modules; only when there is a 'klog handler' | 
 | registered will data actually be logged (see the klog and kleak | 
 | examples for details). | 
 |  | 
 | It is of course possible to use the relay interface from scratch, | 
 | i.e. without using any of the relay-apps example code or klog, but | 
 | you'll have to implement communication between userspace and kernel, | 
 | allowing both to convey the state of buffers (full, empty, amount of | 
 | padding).  The read() interface both removes padding and internally | 
 | consumes the read sub-buffers; thus in cases where read(2) is being | 
 | used to drain the channel buffers, special-purpose communication | 
 | between kernel and user isn't necessary for basic operation.  Things | 
 | such as buffer-full conditions would still need to be communicated via | 
 | some channel though. | 
 |  | 
 | klog and the relay-apps examples can be found in the relay-apps | 
 | tarball on http://relayfs.sourceforge.net | 
 |  | 
 | The relay interface user space API | 
 | ================================== | 
 |  | 
 | The relay interface implements basic file operations for user space | 
 | access to relay channel buffer data.  Here are the file operations | 
 | that are available and some comments regarding their behavior: | 
 |  | 
 | =========== ============================================================ | 
 | open()	    enables user to open an _existing_ channel buffer. | 
 |  | 
 | mmap()      results in channel buffer being mapped into the caller's | 
 | 	    memory space. Note that you can't do a partial mmap - you | 
 | 	    must map the entire file, which is NRBUF * SUBBUFSIZE. | 
 |  | 
 | read()      read the contents of a channel buffer.  The bytes read are | 
 | 	    'consumed' by the reader, i.e. they won't be available | 
 | 	    again to subsequent reads.  If the channel is being used | 
 | 	    in no-overwrite mode (the default), it can be read at any | 
 | 	    time even if there's an active kernel writer.  If the | 
 | 	    channel is being used in overwrite mode and there are | 
 | 	    active channel writers, results may be unpredictable - | 
 | 	    users should make sure that all logging to the channel has | 
 | 	    ended before using read() with overwrite mode.  Sub-buffer | 
 | 	    padding is automatically removed and will not be seen by | 
 | 	    the reader. | 
 |  | 
 | sendfile()  transfer data from a channel buffer to an output file | 
 | 	    descriptor. Sub-buffer padding is automatically removed | 
 | 	    and will not be seen by the reader. | 
 |  | 
 | poll()      POLLIN/POLLRDNORM/POLLERR supported.  User applications are | 
 | 	    notified when sub-buffer boundaries are crossed. | 
 |  | 
 | close()     decrements the channel buffer's refcount.  When the refcount | 
 | 	    reaches 0, i.e. when no process or kernel client has the | 
 | 	    buffer open, the channel buffer is freed. | 
 | =========== ============================================================ | 
 |  | 
 | In order for a user application to make use of relay files, the | 
 | host filesystem must be mounted.  For example:: | 
 |  | 
 | 	mount -t debugfs debugfs /sys/kernel/debug | 
 |  | 
 | .. Note:: | 
 |  | 
 | 	the host filesystem doesn't need to be mounted for kernel | 
 | 	clients to create or use channels - it only needs to be | 
 | 	mounted when user space applications need access to the buffer | 
 | 	data. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | The relay interface kernel API | 
 | ============================== | 
 |  | 
 | Here's a summary of the API the relay interface provides to in-kernel clients: | 
 |  | 
 | TBD(curr. line MT:/API/) | 
 |   channel management functions:: | 
 |  | 
 |     relay_open(base_filename, parent, subbuf_size, n_subbufs, | 
 |                callbacks, private_data) | 
 |     relay_close(chan) | 
 |     relay_flush(chan) | 
 |     relay_reset(chan) | 
 |  | 
 |   channel management typically called on instigation of userspace:: | 
 |  | 
 |     relay_subbufs_consumed(chan, cpu, subbufs_consumed) | 
 |  | 
 |   write functions:: | 
 |  | 
 |     relay_write(chan, data, length) | 
 |     __relay_write(chan, data, length) | 
 |     relay_reserve(chan, length) | 
 |  | 
 |   callbacks:: | 
 |  | 
 |     subbuf_start(buf, subbuf, prev_subbuf, prev_padding) | 
 |     buf_mapped(buf, filp) | 
 |     buf_unmapped(buf, filp) | 
 |     create_buf_file(filename, parent, mode, buf, is_global) | 
 |     remove_buf_file(dentry) | 
 |  | 
 |   helper functions:: | 
 |  | 
 |     relay_buf_full(buf) | 
 |     subbuf_start_reserve(buf, length) | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Creating a channel | 
 | ------------------ | 
 |  | 
 | relay_open() is used to create a channel, along with its per-cpu | 
 | channel buffers.  Each channel buffer will have an associated file | 
 | created for it in the host filesystem, which can be and mmapped or | 
 | read from in user space.  The files are named basename0...basenameN-1 | 
 | where N is the number of online cpus, and by default will be created | 
 | in the root of the filesystem (if the parent param is NULL).  If you | 
 | want a directory structure to contain your relay files, you should | 
 | create it using the host filesystem's directory creation function, | 
 | e.g. debugfs_create_dir(), and pass the parent directory to | 
 | relay_open().  Users are responsible for cleaning up any directory | 
 | structure they create, when the channel is closed - again the host | 
 | filesystem's directory removal functions should be used for that, | 
 | e.g. debugfs_remove(). | 
 |  | 
 | In order for a channel to be created and the host filesystem's files | 
 | associated with its channel buffers, the user must provide definitions | 
 | for two callback functions, create_buf_file() and remove_buf_file(). | 
 | create_buf_file() is called once for each per-cpu buffer from | 
 | relay_open() and allows the user to create the file which will be used | 
 | to represent the corresponding channel buffer.  The callback should | 
 | return the dentry of the file created to represent the channel buffer. | 
 | remove_buf_file() must also be defined; it's responsible for deleting | 
 | the file(s) created in create_buf_file() and is called during | 
 | relay_close(). | 
 |  | 
 | Here are some typical definitions for these callbacks, in this case | 
 | using debugfs:: | 
 |  | 
 |     /* | 
 |     * create_buf_file() callback.  Creates relay file in debugfs. | 
 |     */ | 
 |     static struct dentry *create_buf_file_handler(const char *filename, | 
 | 						struct dentry *parent, | 
 | 						umode_t mode, | 
 | 						struct rchan_buf *buf, | 
 | 						int *is_global) | 
 |     { | 
 | 	    return debugfs_create_file(filename, mode, parent, buf, | 
 | 				    &relay_file_operations); | 
 |     } | 
 |  | 
 |     /* | 
 |     * remove_buf_file() callback.  Removes relay file from debugfs. | 
 |     */ | 
 |     static int remove_buf_file_handler(struct dentry *dentry) | 
 |     { | 
 | 	    debugfs_remove(dentry); | 
 |  | 
 | 	    return 0; | 
 |     } | 
 |  | 
 |     /* | 
 |     * relay interface callbacks | 
 |     */ | 
 |     static struct rchan_callbacks relay_callbacks = | 
 |     { | 
 | 	    .create_buf_file = create_buf_file_handler, | 
 | 	    .remove_buf_file = remove_buf_file_handler, | 
 |     }; | 
 |  | 
 | And an example relay_open() invocation using them:: | 
 |  | 
 |   chan = relay_open("cpu", NULL, SUBBUF_SIZE, N_SUBBUFS, &relay_callbacks, NULL); | 
 |  | 
 | If the create_buf_file() callback fails, or isn't defined, channel | 
 | creation and thus relay_open() will fail. | 
 |  | 
 | The total size of each per-cpu buffer is calculated by multiplying the | 
 | number of sub-buffers by the sub-buffer size passed into relay_open(). | 
 | The idea behind sub-buffers is that they're basically an extension of | 
 | double-buffering to N buffers, and they also allow applications to | 
 | easily implement random-access-on-buffer-boundary schemes, which can | 
 | be important for some high-volume applications.  The number and size | 
 | of sub-buffers is completely dependent on the application and even for | 
 | the same application, different conditions will warrant different | 
 | values for these parameters at different times.  Typically, the right | 
 | values to use are best decided after some experimentation; in general, | 
 | though, it's safe to assume that having only 1 sub-buffer is a bad | 
 | idea - you're guaranteed to either overwrite data or lose events | 
 | depending on the channel mode being used. | 
 |  | 
 | The create_buf_file() implementation can also be defined in such a way | 
 | as to allow the creation of a single 'global' buffer instead of the | 
 | default per-cpu set.  This can be useful for applications interested | 
 | mainly in seeing the relative ordering of system-wide events without | 
 | the need to bother with saving explicit timestamps for the purpose of | 
 | merging/sorting per-cpu files in a postprocessing step. | 
 |  | 
 | To have relay_open() create a global buffer, the create_buf_file() | 
 | implementation should set the value of the is_global outparam to a | 
 | non-zero value in addition to creating the file that will be used to | 
 | represent the single buffer.  In the case of a global buffer, | 
 | create_buf_file() and remove_buf_file() will be called only once.  The | 
 | normal channel-writing functions, e.g. relay_write(), can still be | 
 | used - writes from any cpu will transparently end up in the global | 
 | buffer - but since it is a global buffer, callers should make sure | 
 | they use the proper locking for such a buffer, either by wrapping | 
 | writes in a spinlock, or by copying a write function from relay.h and | 
 | creating a local version that internally does the proper locking. | 
 |  | 
 | The private_data passed into relay_open() allows clients to associate | 
 | user-defined data with a channel, and is immediately available | 
 | (including in create_buf_file()) via chan->private_data or | 
 | buf->chan->private_data. | 
 |  | 
 | Buffer-only channels | 
 | -------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | These channels have no files associated and can be created with | 
 | relay_open(NULL, NULL, ...). Such channels are useful in scenarios such | 
 | as when doing early tracing in the kernel, before the VFS is up. In these | 
 | cases, one may open a buffer-only channel and then call | 
 | relay_late_setup_files() when the kernel is ready to handle files, | 
 | to expose the buffered data to the userspace. | 
 |  | 
 | Channel 'modes' | 
 | --------------- | 
 |  | 
 | relay channels can be used in either of two modes - 'overwrite' or | 
 | 'no-overwrite'.  The mode is entirely determined by the implementation | 
 | of the subbuf_start() callback, as described below.  The default if no | 
 | subbuf_start() callback is defined is 'no-overwrite' mode.  If the | 
 | default mode suits your needs, and you plan to use the read() | 
 | interface to retrieve channel data, you can ignore the details of this | 
 | section, as it pertains mainly to mmap() implementations. | 
 |  | 
 | In 'overwrite' mode, also known as 'flight recorder' mode, writes | 
 | continuously cycle around the buffer and will never fail, but will | 
 | unconditionally overwrite old data regardless of whether it's actually | 
 | been consumed.  In no-overwrite mode, writes will fail, i.e. data will | 
 | be lost, if the number of unconsumed sub-buffers equals the total | 
 | number of sub-buffers in the channel.  It should be clear that if | 
 | there is no consumer or if the consumer can't consume sub-buffers fast | 
 | enough, data will be lost in either case; the only difference is | 
 | whether data is lost from the beginning or the end of a buffer. | 
 |  | 
 | As explained above, a relay channel is made of up one or more | 
 | per-cpu channel buffers, each implemented as a circular buffer | 
 | subdivided into one or more sub-buffers.  Messages are written into | 
 | the current sub-buffer of the channel's current per-cpu buffer via the | 
 | write functions described below.  Whenever a message can't fit into | 
 | the current sub-buffer, because there's no room left for it, the | 
 | client is notified via the subbuf_start() callback that a switch to a | 
 | new sub-buffer is about to occur.  The client uses this callback to 1) | 
 | initialize the next sub-buffer if appropriate 2) finalize the previous | 
 | sub-buffer if appropriate and 3) return a boolean value indicating | 
 | whether or not to actually move on to the next sub-buffer. | 
 |  | 
 | To implement 'no-overwrite' mode, the userspace client would provide | 
 | an implementation of the subbuf_start() callback something like the | 
 | following:: | 
 |  | 
 |     static int subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf, | 
 | 			    void *subbuf, | 
 | 			    void *prev_subbuf, | 
 | 			    unsigned int prev_padding) | 
 |     { | 
 | 	    if (prev_subbuf) | 
 | 		    *((unsigned *)prev_subbuf) = prev_padding; | 
 |  | 
 | 	    if (relay_buf_full(buf)) | 
 | 		    return 0; | 
 |  | 
 | 	    subbuf_start_reserve(buf, sizeof(unsigned int)); | 
 |  | 
 | 	    return 1; | 
 |     } | 
 |  | 
 | If the current buffer is full, i.e. all sub-buffers remain unconsumed, | 
 | the callback returns 0 to indicate that the buffer switch should not | 
 | occur yet, i.e. until the consumer has had a chance to read the | 
 | current set of ready sub-buffers.  For the relay_buf_full() function | 
 | to make sense, the consumer is responsible for notifying the relay | 
 | interface when sub-buffers have been consumed via | 
 | relay_subbufs_consumed().  Any subsequent attempts to write into the | 
 | buffer will again invoke the subbuf_start() callback with the same | 
 | parameters; only when the consumer has consumed one or more of the | 
 | ready sub-buffers will relay_buf_full() return 0, in which case the | 
 | buffer switch can continue. | 
 |  | 
 | The implementation of the subbuf_start() callback for 'overwrite' mode | 
 | would be very similar:: | 
 |  | 
 |     static int subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf, | 
 | 			    void *subbuf, | 
 | 			    void *prev_subbuf, | 
 | 			    size_t prev_padding) | 
 |     { | 
 | 	    if (prev_subbuf) | 
 | 		    *((unsigned *)prev_subbuf) = prev_padding; | 
 |  | 
 | 	    subbuf_start_reserve(buf, sizeof(unsigned int)); | 
 |  | 
 | 	    return 1; | 
 |     } | 
 |  | 
 | In this case, the relay_buf_full() check is meaningless and the | 
 | callback always returns 1, causing the buffer switch to occur | 
 | unconditionally.  It's also meaningless for the client to use the | 
 | relay_subbufs_consumed() function in this mode, as it's never | 
 | consulted. | 
 |  | 
 | The default subbuf_start() implementation, used if the client doesn't | 
 | define any callbacks, or doesn't define the subbuf_start() callback, | 
 | implements the simplest possible 'no-overwrite' mode, i.e. it does | 
 | nothing but return 0. | 
 |  | 
 | Header information can be reserved at the beginning of each sub-buffer | 
 | by calling the subbuf_start_reserve() helper function from within the | 
 | subbuf_start() callback.  This reserved area can be used to store | 
 | whatever information the client wants.  In the example above, room is | 
 | reserved in each sub-buffer to store the padding count for that | 
 | sub-buffer.  This is filled in for the previous sub-buffer in the | 
 | subbuf_start() implementation; the padding value for the previous | 
 | sub-buffer is passed into the subbuf_start() callback along with a | 
 | pointer to the previous sub-buffer, since the padding value isn't | 
 | known until a sub-buffer is filled.  The subbuf_start() callback is | 
 | also called for the first sub-buffer when the channel is opened, to | 
 | give the client a chance to reserve space in it.  In this case the | 
 | previous sub-buffer pointer passed into the callback will be NULL, so | 
 | the client should check the value of the prev_subbuf pointer before | 
 | writing into the previous sub-buffer. | 
 |  | 
 | Writing to a channel | 
 | -------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | Kernel clients write data into the current cpu's channel buffer using | 
 | relay_write() or __relay_write().  relay_write() is the main logging | 
 | function - it uses local_irqsave() to protect the buffer and should be | 
 | used if you might be logging from interrupt context.  If you know | 
 | you'll never be logging from interrupt context, you can use | 
 | __relay_write(), which only disables preemption.  These functions | 
 | don't return a value, so you can't determine whether or not they | 
 | failed - the assumption is that you wouldn't want to check a return | 
 | value in the fast logging path anyway, and that they'll always succeed | 
 | unless the buffer is full and no-overwrite mode is being used, in | 
 | which case you can detect a failed write in the subbuf_start() | 
 | callback by calling the relay_buf_full() helper function. | 
 |  | 
 | relay_reserve() is used to reserve a slot in a channel buffer which | 
 | can be written to later.  This would typically be used in applications | 
 | that need to write directly into a channel buffer without having to | 
 | stage data in a temporary buffer beforehand.  Because the actual write | 
 | may not happen immediately after the slot is reserved, applications | 
 | using relay_reserve() can keep a count of the number of bytes actually | 
 | written, either in space reserved in the sub-buffers themselves or as | 
 | a separate array.  See the 'reserve' example in the relay-apps tarball | 
 | at http://relayfs.sourceforge.net for an example of how this can be | 
 | done.  Because the write is under control of the client and is | 
 | separated from the reserve, relay_reserve() doesn't protect the buffer | 
 | at all - it's up to the client to provide the appropriate | 
 | synchronization when using relay_reserve(). | 
 |  | 
 | Closing a channel | 
 | ----------------- | 
 |  | 
 | The client calls relay_close() when it's finished using the channel. | 
 | The channel and its associated buffers are destroyed when there are no | 
 | longer any references to any of the channel buffers.  relay_flush() | 
 | forces a sub-buffer switch on all the channel buffers, and can be used | 
 | to finalize and process the last sub-buffers before the channel is | 
 | closed. | 
 |  | 
 | Misc | 
 | ---- | 
 |  | 
 | Some applications may want to keep a channel around and re-use it | 
 | rather than open and close a new channel for each use.  relay_reset() | 
 | can be used for this purpose - it resets a channel to its initial | 
 | state without reallocating channel buffer memory or destroying | 
 | existing mappings.  It should however only be called when it's safe to | 
 | do so, i.e. when the channel isn't currently being written to. | 
 |  | 
 | Finally, there are a couple of utility callbacks that can be used for | 
 | different purposes.  buf_mapped() is called whenever a channel buffer | 
 | is mmapped from user space and buf_unmapped() is called when it's | 
 | unmapped.  The client can use this notification to trigger actions | 
 | within the kernel application, such as enabling/disabling logging to | 
 | the channel. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Resources | 
 | ========= | 
 |  | 
 | For news, example code, mailing list, etc. see the relay interface homepage: | 
 |  | 
 |     http://relayfs.sourceforge.net | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Credits | 
 | ======= | 
 |  | 
 | The ideas and specs for the relay interface came about as a result of | 
 | discussions on tracing involving the following: | 
 |  | 
 | Michel Dagenais		<michel.dagenais@polymtl.ca> | 
 | Richard Moore		<richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com> | 
 | Bob Wisniewski		<bob@watson.ibm.com> | 
 | Karim Yaghmour		<karim@opersys.com> | 
 | Tom Zanussi		<zanussi@us.ibm.com> | 
 |  | 
 | Also thanks to Hubertus Franke for a lot of useful suggestions and bug | 
 | reports. |