| |
| .. _local_ops: |
| |
| ================================================= |
| Semantics and Behavior of Local Atomic Operations |
| ================================================= |
| |
| :Author: Mathieu Desnoyers |
| |
| |
| This document explains the purpose of the local atomic operations, how |
| to implement them for any given architecture and shows how they can be used |
| properly. It also stresses on the precautions that must be taken when reading |
| those local variables across CPUs when the order of memory writes matters. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| Note that ``local_t`` based operations are not recommended for general |
| kernel use. Please use the ``this_cpu`` operations instead unless there is |
| really a special purpose. Most uses of ``local_t`` in the kernel have been |
| replaced by ``this_cpu`` operations. ``this_cpu`` operations combine the |
| relocation with the ``local_t`` like semantics in a single instruction and |
| yield more compact and faster executing code. |
| |
| |
| Purpose of local atomic operations |
| ================================== |
| |
| Local atomic operations are meant to provide fast and highly reentrant per CPU |
| counters. They minimize the performance cost of standard atomic operations by |
| removing the LOCK prefix and memory barriers normally required to synchronize |
| across CPUs. |
| |
| Having fast per CPU atomic counters is interesting in many cases: it does not |
| require disabling interrupts to protect from interrupt handlers and it permits |
| coherent counters in NMI handlers. It is especially useful for tracing purposes |
| and for various performance monitoring counters. |
| |
| Local atomic operations only guarantee variable modification atomicity wrt the |
| CPU which owns the data. Therefore, care must taken to make sure that only one |
| CPU writes to the ``local_t`` data. This is done by using per cpu data and |
| making sure that we modify it from within a preemption safe context. It is |
| however permitted to read ``local_t`` data from any CPU: it will then appear to |
| be written out of order wrt other memory writes by the owner CPU. |
| |
| |
| Implementation for a given architecture |
| ======================================= |
| |
| It can be done by slightly modifying the standard atomic operations: only |
| their UP variant must be kept. It typically means removing LOCK prefix (on |
| i386 and x86_64) and any SMP synchronization barrier. If the architecture does |
| not have a different behavior between SMP and UP, including |
| ``asm-generic/local.h`` in your architecture's ``local.h`` is sufficient. |
| |
| The ``local_t`` type is defined as an opaque ``signed long`` by embedding an |
| ``atomic_long_t`` inside a structure. This is made so a cast from this type to |
| a ``long`` fails. The definition looks like:: |
| |
| typedef struct { atomic_long_t a; } local_t; |
| |
| |
| Rules to follow when using local atomic operations |
| ================================================== |
| |
| * Variables touched by local ops must be per cpu variables. |
| * *Only* the CPU owner of these variables must write to them. |
| * This CPU can use local ops from any context (process, irq, softirq, nmi, ...) |
| to update its ``local_t`` variables. |
| * Preemption (or interrupts) must be disabled when using local ops in |
| process context to make sure the process won't be migrated to a |
| different CPU between getting the per-cpu variable and doing the |
| actual local op. |
| * When using local ops in interrupt context, no special care must be |
| taken on a mainline kernel, since they will run on the local CPU with |
| preemption already disabled. I suggest, however, to explicitly |
| disable preemption anyway to make sure it will still work correctly on |
| -rt kernels. |
| * Reading the local cpu variable will provide the current copy of the |
| variable. |
| * Reads of these variables can be done from any CPU, because updates to |
| "``long``", aligned, variables are always atomic. Since no memory |
| synchronization is done by the writer CPU, an outdated copy of the |
| variable can be read when reading some *other* cpu's variables. |
| |
| |
| How to use local atomic operations |
| ================================== |
| |
| :: |
| |
| #include <linux/percpu.h> |
| #include <asm/local.h> |
| |
| static DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t, counters) = LOCAL_INIT(0); |
| |
| |
| Counting |
| ======== |
| |
| Counting is done on all the bits of a signed long. |
| |
| In preemptible context, use ``get_cpu_var()`` and ``put_cpu_var()`` around |
| local atomic operations: it makes sure that preemption is disabled around write |
| access to the per cpu variable. For instance:: |
| |
| local_inc(&get_cpu_var(counters)); |
| put_cpu_var(counters); |
| |
| If you are already in a preemption-safe context, you can use |
| ``this_cpu_ptr()`` instead:: |
| |
| local_inc(this_cpu_ptr(&counters)); |
| |
| |
| |
| Reading the counters |
| ==================== |
| |
| Those local counters can be read from foreign CPUs to sum the count. Note that |
| the data seen by local_read across CPUs must be considered to be out of order |
| relatively to other memory writes happening on the CPU that owns the data:: |
| |
| long sum = 0; |
| for_each_online_cpu(cpu) |
| sum += local_read(&per_cpu(counters, cpu)); |
| |
| If you want to use a remote local_read to synchronize access to a resource |
| between CPUs, explicit ``smp_wmb()`` and ``smp_rmb()`` memory barriers must be used |
| respectively on the writer and the reader CPUs. It would be the case if you use |
| the ``local_t`` variable as a counter of bytes written in a buffer: there should |
| be a ``smp_wmb()`` between the buffer write and the counter increment and also a |
| ``smp_rmb()`` between the counter read and the buffer read. |
| |
| |
| Here is a sample module which implements a basic per cpu counter using |
| ``local.h``:: |
| |
| /* test-local.c |
| * |
| * Sample module for local.h usage. |
| */ |
| |
| |
| #include <asm/local.h> |
| #include <linux/module.h> |
| #include <linux/timer.h> |
| |
| static DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t, counters) = LOCAL_INIT(0); |
| |
| static struct timer_list test_timer; |
| |
| /* IPI called on each CPU. */ |
| static void test_each(void *info) |
| { |
| /* Increment the counter from a non preemptible context */ |
| printk("Increment on cpu %d\n", smp_processor_id()); |
| local_inc(this_cpu_ptr(&counters)); |
| |
| /* This is what incrementing the variable would look like within a |
| * preemptible context (it disables preemption) : |
| * |
| * local_inc(&get_cpu_var(counters)); |
| * put_cpu_var(counters); |
| */ |
| } |
| |
| static void do_test_timer(unsigned long data) |
| { |
| int cpu; |
| |
| /* Increment the counters */ |
| on_each_cpu(test_each, NULL, 1); |
| /* Read all the counters */ |
| printk("Counters read from CPU %d\n", smp_processor_id()); |
| for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { |
| printk("Read : CPU %d, count %ld\n", cpu, |
| local_read(&per_cpu(counters, cpu))); |
| } |
| mod_timer(&test_timer, jiffies + 1000); |
| } |
| |
| static int __init test_init(void) |
| { |
| /* initialize the timer that will increment the counter */ |
| timer_setup(&test_timer, do_test_timer, 0); |
| mod_timer(&test_timer, jiffies + 1); |
| |
| return 0; |
| } |
| |
| static void __exit test_exit(void) |
| { |
| timer_shutdown_sync(&test_timer); |
| } |
| |
| module_init(test_init); |
| module_exit(test_exit); |
| |
| MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); |
| MODULE_AUTHOR("Mathieu Desnoyers"); |
| MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Local Atomic Ops"); |