| .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 |
| .. Copyright © 2017-2020 Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> |
| .. Copyright © 2019-2020 ANSSI |
| |
| ================================== |
| Landlock LSM: kernel documentation |
| ================================== |
| |
| :Author: Mickaël Salaün |
| :Date: March 2021 |
| |
| Landlock's goal is to create scoped access-control (i.e. sandboxing). To |
| harden a whole system, this feature should be available to any process, |
| including unprivileged ones. Because such process may be compromised or |
| backdoored (i.e. untrusted), Landlock's features must be safe to use from the |
| kernel and other processes point of view. Landlock's interface must therefore |
| expose a minimal attack surface. |
| |
| Landlock is designed to be usable by unprivileged processes while following the |
| system security policy enforced by other access control mechanisms (e.g. DAC, |
| LSM). Indeed, a Landlock rule shall not interfere with other access-controls |
| enforced on the system, only add more restrictions. |
| |
| Any user can enforce Landlock rulesets on their processes. They are merged and |
| evaluated according to the inherited ones in a way that ensures that only more |
| constraints can be added. |
| |
| User space documentation can be found here: |
| Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst. |
| |
| Guiding principles for safe access controls |
| =========================================== |
| |
| * A Landlock rule shall be focused on access control on kernel objects instead |
| of syscall filtering (i.e. syscall arguments), which is the purpose of |
| seccomp-bpf. |
| * To avoid multiple kinds of side-channel attacks (e.g. leak of security |
| policies, CPU-based attacks), Landlock rules shall not be able to |
| programmatically communicate with user space. |
| * Kernel access check shall not slow down access request from unsandboxed |
| processes. |
| * Computation related to Landlock operations (e.g. enforcing a ruleset) shall |
| only impact the processes requesting them. |
| |
| Tests |
| ===== |
| |
| Userspace tests for backward compatibility, ptrace restrictions and filesystem |
| support can be found here: `tools/testing/selftests/landlock/`_. |
| |
| Kernel structures |
| ================= |
| |
| Object |
| ------ |
| |
| .. kernel-doc:: security/landlock/object.h |
| :identifiers: |
| |
| Filesystem |
| ---------- |
| |
| .. kernel-doc:: security/landlock/fs.h |
| :identifiers: |
| |
| Ruleset and domain |
| ------------------ |
| |
| A domain is a read-only ruleset tied to a set of subjects (i.e. tasks' |
| credentials). Each time a ruleset is enforced on a task, the current domain is |
| duplicated and the ruleset is imported as a new layer of rules in the new |
| domain. Indeed, once in a domain, each rule is tied to a layer level. To |
| grant access to an object, at least one rule of each layer must allow the |
| requested action on the object. A task can then only transit to a new domain |
| that is the intersection of the constraints from the current domain and those |
| of a ruleset provided by the task. |
| |
| The definition of a subject is implicit for a task sandboxing itself, which |
| makes the reasoning much easier and helps avoid pitfalls. |
| |
| .. kernel-doc:: security/landlock/ruleset.h |
| :identifiers: |
| |
| .. Links |
| .. _tools/testing/selftests/landlock/: |
| https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ |