| Objtool |
| ======= |
| |
| The kernel CONFIG_OBJTOOL option enables a host tool named 'objtool' |
| which runs at compile time. It can do various validations and |
| transformations on .o files. |
| |
| Objtool has become an integral part of the x86-64 kernel toolchain. The |
| kernel depends on it for a variety of security and performance features |
| (and other types of features as well). |
| |
| |
| Features |
| -------- |
| |
| Objtool has the following features: |
| |
| - Stack unwinding metadata validation -- useful for helping to ensure |
| stack traces are reliable for live patching |
| |
| - ORC unwinder metadata generation -- a faster and more precise |
| alternative to frame pointer based unwinding |
| |
| - Retpoline validation -- ensures that all indirect calls go through |
| retpoline thunks, for Spectre v2 mitigations |
| |
| - Retpoline call site annotation -- annotates all retpoline thunk call |
| sites, enabling the kernel to patch them inline, to prevent "thunk |
| funneling" for both security and performance reasons |
| |
| - Non-instrumentation validation -- validates non-instrumentable |
| ("noinstr") code rules, preventing instrumentation in low-level C |
| entry code |
| |
| - Static call annotation -- annotates static call sites, enabling the |
| kernel to implement inline static calls, a faster alternative to some |
| indirect branches |
| |
| - Uaccess validation -- validates uaccess rules for a proper |
| implementation of Supervisor Mode Access Protection (SMAP) |
| |
| - Straight Line Speculation validation -- validates certain SLS |
| mitigations |
| |
| - Indirect Branch Tracking validation -- validates Intel CET IBT rules |
| to ensure that all functions referenced by function pointers have |
| corresponding ENDBR instructions |
| |
| - Indirect Branch Tracking annotation -- annotates unused ENDBR |
| instruction sites, enabling the kernel to "seal" them (replace them |
| with NOPs) to further harden IBT |
| |
| - Function entry annotation -- annotates function entries, enabling |
| kernel function tracing |
| |
| - Other toolchain hacks which will go unmentioned at this time... |
| |
| Each feature can be enabled individually or in combination using the |
| objtool cmdline. |
| |
| |
| Objects |
| ------- |
| |
| Typically, objtool runs on every translation unit (TU, aka ".o file") in |
| the kernel. If a TU is part of a kernel module, the '--module' option |
| is added. |
| |
| However: |
| |
| - If noinstr validation is enabled, it also runs on vmlinux.o, with all |
| options removed and '--noinstr' added. |
| |
| - If IBT or LTO is enabled, it doesn't run on TUs at all. Instead it |
| runs on vmlinux.o and linked modules, with all options. |
| |
| In summary: |
| |
| A) Legacy mode: |
| TU: objtool [--module] <options> |
| vmlinux: N/A |
| module: N/A |
| |
| B) CONFIG_NOINSTR_VALIDATION=y && !(CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT=y || CONFIG_LTO=y): |
| TU: objtool [--module] <options> // no --noinstr |
| vmlinux: objtool --noinstr // other options removed |
| module: N/A |
| |
| C) CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT=y || CONFIG_LTO=y: |
| TU: N/A |
| vmlinux: objtool --noinstr <options> |
| module: objtool --module --noinstr <options> |
| |
| |
| Stack validation |
| ---------------- |
| |
| Objtool's stack validation feature analyzes every .o file and ensures |
| the validity of its stack metadata. It enforces a set of rules on asm |
| code and C inline assembly code so that stack traces can be reliable. |
| |
| For each function, it recursively follows all possible code paths and |
| validates the correct frame pointer state at each instruction. |
| |
| It also follows code paths involving special sections, like |
| .altinstructions, __jump_table, and __ex_table, which can add |
| alternative execution paths to a given instruction (or set of |
| instructions). Similarly, it knows how to follow switch statements, for |
| which gcc sometimes uses jump tables. |
| |
| Here are some of the benefits of validating stack metadata: |
| |
| a) More reliable stack traces for frame pointer enabled kernels |
| |
| Frame pointers are used for debugging purposes. They allow runtime |
| code and debug tools to be able to walk the stack to determine the |
| chain of function call sites that led to the currently executing |
| code. |
| |
| For some architectures, frame pointers are enabled by |
| CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER. For some other architectures they may be |
| required by the ABI (sometimes referred to as "backchain pointers"). |
| |
| For C code, gcc automatically generates instructions for setting up |
| frame pointers when the -fno-omit-frame-pointer option is used. |
| |
| But for asm code, the frame setup instructions have to be written by |
| hand, which most people don't do. So the end result is that |
| CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is honored for C code but not for most asm code. |
| |
| For stack traces based on frame pointers to be reliable, all |
| functions which call other functions must first create a stack frame |
| and update the frame pointer. If a first function doesn't properly |
| create a stack frame before calling a second function, the *caller* |
| of the first function will be skipped on the stack trace. |
| |
| For example, consider the following example backtrace with frame |
| pointers enabled: |
| |
| [<ffffffff81812584>] dump_stack+0x4b/0x63 |
| [<ffffffff812d6dc2>] cmdline_proc_show+0x12/0x30 |
| [<ffffffff8127f568>] seq_read+0x108/0x3e0 |
| [<ffffffff812cce62>] proc_reg_read+0x42/0x70 |
| [<ffffffff81256197>] __vfs_read+0x37/0x100 |
| [<ffffffff81256b16>] vfs_read+0x86/0x130 |
| [<ffffffff81257898>] SyS_read+0x58/0xd0 |
| [<ffffffff8181c1f2>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x76 |
| |
| It correctly shows that the caller of cmdline_proc_show() is |
| seq_read(). |
| |
| If we remove the frame pointer logic from cmdline_proc_show() by |
| replacing the frame pointer related instructions with nops, here's |
| what it looks like instead: |
| |
| [<ffffffff81812584>] dump_stack+0x4b/0x63 |
| [<ffffffff812d6dc2>] cmdline_proc_show+0x12/0x30 |
| [<ffffffff812cce62>] proc_reg_read+0x42/0x70 |
| [<ffffffff81256197>] __vfs_read+0x37/0x100 |
| [<ffffffff81256b16>] vfs_read+0x86/0x130 |
| [<ffffffff81257898>] SyS_read+0x58/0xd0 |
| [<ffffffff8181c1f2>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x76 |
| |
| Notice that cmdline_proc_show()'s caller, seq_read(), has been |
| skipped. Instead the stack trace seems to show that |
| cmdline_proc_show() was called by proc_reg_read(). |
| |
| The benefit of objtool here is that because it ensures that *all* |
| functions honor CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER, no functions will ever[*] be |
| skipped on a stack trace. |
| |
| [*] unless an interrupt or exception has occurred at the very |
| beginning of a function before the stack frame has been created, |
| or at the very end of the function after the stack frame has been |
| destroyed. This is an inherent limitation of frame pointers. |
| |
| b) ORC (Oops Rewind Capability) unwind table generation |
| |
| An alternative to frame pointers and DWARF, ORC unwind data can be |
| used to walk the stack. Unlike frame pointers, ORC data is out of |
| band. So it doesn't affect runtime performance and it can be |
| reliable even when interrupts or exceptions are involved. |
| |
| For more details, see Documentation/arch/x86/orc-unwinder.rst. |
| |
| c) Higher live patching compatibility rate |
| |
| Livepatch has an optional "consistency model", which is needed for |
| more complex patches. In order for the consistency model to work, |
| stack traces need to be reliable (or an unreliable condition needs to |
| be detectable). Objtool makes that possible. |
| |
| For more details, see the livepatch documentation in the Linux kernel |
| source tree at Documentation/livepatch/livepatch.rst. |
| |
| To achieve the validation, objtool enforces the following rules: |
| |
| 1. Each callable function must be annotated as such with the ELF |
| function type. In asm code, this is typically done using the |
| ENTRY/ENDPROC macros. If objtool finds a return instruction |
| outside of a function, it flags an error since that usually indicates |
| callable code which should be annotated accordingly. |
| |
| This rule is needed so that objtool can properly identify each |
| callable function in order to analyze its stack metadata. |
| |
| 2. Conversely, each section of code which is *not* callable should *not* |
| be annotated as an ELF function. The ENDPROC macro shouldn't be used |
| in this case. |
| |
| This rule is needed so that objtool can ignore non-callable code. |
| Such code doesn't have to follow any of the other rules. |
| |
| 3. Each callable function which calls another function must have the |
| correct frame pointer logic, if required by CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER or |
| the architecture's back chain rules. This can by done in asm code |
| with the FRAME_BEGIN/FRAME_END macros. |
| |
| This rule ensures that frame pointer based stack traces will work as |
| designed. If function A doesn't create a stack frame before calling |
| function B, the _caller_ of function A will be skipped on the stack |
| trace. |
| |
| 4. Dynamic jumps and jumps to undefined symbols are only allowed if: |
| |
| a) the jump is part of a switch statement; or |
| |
| b) the jump matches sibling call semantics and the frame pointer has |
| the same value it had on function entry. |
| |
| This rule is needed so that objtool can reliably analyze all of a |
| function's code paths. If a function jumps to code in another file, |
| and it's not a sibling call, objtool has no way to follow the jump |
| because it only analyzes a single file at a time. |
| |
| 5. A callable function may not execute kernel entry/exit instructions. |
| The only code which needs such instructions is kernel entry code, |
| which shouldn't be be in callable functions anyway. |
| |
| This rule is just a sanity check to ensure that callable functions |
| return normally. |
| |
| |
| Objtool warnings |
| ---------------- |
| |
| NOTE: When requesting help with an objtool warning, please recreate with |
| OBJTOOL_VERBOSE=1 (e.g., "make OBJTOOL_VERBOSE=1") and send the full |
| output, including any disassembly or backtrace below the warning, to the |
| objtool maintainers. |
| |
| For asm files, if you're getting an error which doesn't make sense, |
| first make sure that the affected code follows the above rules. |
| |
| For C files, the common culprits are inline asm statements and calls to |
| "noreturn" functions. See below for more details. |
| |
| Another possible cause for errors in C code is if the Makefile removes |
| -fno-omit-frame-pointer or adds -fomit-frame-pointer to the gcc options. |
| |
| Here are some examples of common warnings reported by objtool, what |
| they mean, and suggestions for how to fix them. When in doubt, ping |
| the objtool maintainers. |
| |
| |
| 1. file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x128: call without frame pointer save/setup |
| |
| The func() function made a function call without first saving and/or |
| updating the frame pointer, and CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled. |
| |
| If the error is for an asm file, and func() is indeed a callable |
| function, add proper frame pointer logic using the FRAME_BEGIN and |
| FRAME_END macros. Otherwise, if it's not a callable function, remove |
| its ELF function annotation by changing ENDPROC to END, and instead |
| use the manual unwind hint macros in asm/unwind_hints.h. |
| |
| If it's a GCC-compiled .c file, the error may be because the function |
| uses an inline asm() statement which has a "call" instruction. An |
| asm() statement with a call instruction must declare the use of the |
| stack pointer in its output operand. On x86_64, this means adding |
| the ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT as an output constraint: |
| |
| asm volatile("call func" : ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT); |
| |
| Otherwise the stack frame may not get created before the call. |
| |
| |
| 2. file.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x53: unreachable instruction |
| |
| Objtool couldn't find a code path to reach the instruction. |
| |
| If the error is for an asm file, and the instruction is inside (or |
| reachable from) a callable function, the function should be annotated |
| with the ENTRY/ENDPROC macros (ENDPROC is the important one). |
| Otherwise, the code should probably be annotated with the unwind hint |
| macros in asm/unwind_hints.h so objtool and the unwinder can know the |
| stack state associated with the code. |
| |
| If you're 100% sure the code won't affect stack traces, or if you're |
| a just a bad person, you can tell objtool to ignore it. See the |
| "Adding exceptions" section below. |
| |
| If it's not actually in a callable function (e.g. kernel entry code), |
| change ENDPROC to END. |
| |
| 3. file.o: warning: objtool: foo+0x48c: bar() is missing a __noreturn annotation |
| |
| The call from foo() to bar() doesn't return, but bar() is missing the |
| __noreturn annotation. NOTE: In addition to annotating the function |
| with __noreturn, please also add it to tools/objtool/noreturns.h. |
| |
| 4. file.o: warning: objtool: func(): can't find starting instruction |
| or |
| file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x11dd: can't decode instruction |
| |
| Does the file have data in a text section? If so, that can confuse |
| objtool's instruction decoder. Move the data to a more appropriate |
| section like .data or .rodata. |
| |
| |
| 5. file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x6: unsupported instruction in callable function |
| |
| This is a kernel entry/exit instruction like sysenter or iret. Such |
| instructions aren't allowed in a callable function, and are most |
| likely part of the kernel entry code. They should usually not have |
| the callable function annotation (ENDPROC) and should always be |
| annotated with the unwind hint macros in asm/unwind_hints.h. |
| |
| |
| 6. file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x26: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame |
| |
| This is a dynamic jump or a jump to an undefined symbol. Objtool |
| assumed it's a sibling call and detected that the frame pointer |
| wasn't first restored to its original state. |
| |
| If it's not really a sibling call, you may need to move the |
| destination code to the local file. |
| |
| If the instruction is not actually in a callable function (e.g. |
| kernel entry code), change ENDPROC to END and annotate manually with |
| the unwind hint macros in asm/unwind_hints.h. |
| |
| |
| 7. file: warning: objtool: func()+0x5c: stack state mismatch |
| |
| The instruction's frame pointer state is inconsistent, depending on |
| which execution path was taken to reach the instruction. |
| |
| Make sure that, when CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled, the function |
| pushes and sets up the frame pointer (for x86_64, this means rbp) at |
| the beginning of the function and pops it at the end of the function. |
| Also make sure that no other code in the function touches the frame |
| pointer. |
| |
| Another possibility is that the code has some asm or inline asm which |
| does some unusual things to the stack or the frame pointer. In such |
| cases it's probably appropriate to use the unwind hint macros in |
| asm/unwind_hints.h. |
| |
| |
| 8. file.o: warning: objtool: funcA() falls through to next function funcB() |
| |
| This means that funcA() doesn't end with a return instruction or an |
| unconditional jump, and that objtool has determined that the function |
| can fall through into the next function. There could be different |
| reasons for this: |
| |
| 1) funcA()'s last instruction is a call to a "noreturn" function like |
| panic(). In this case the noreturn function needs to be added to |
| objtool's hard-coded global_noreturns array. Feel free to bug the |
| objtool maintainer, or you can submit a patch. |
| |
| 2) funcA() uses the unreachable() annotation in a section of code |
| that is actually reachable. |
| |
| 3) If funcA() calls an inline function, the object code for funcA() |
| might be corrupt due to a gcc bug. For more details, see: |
| https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646 |
| |
| 9. file.o: warning: objtool: funcA() call to funcB() with UACCESS enabled |
| |
| This means that an unexpected call to a non-whitelisted function exists |
| outside of arch-specific guards. |
| X86: SMAP (stac/clac): __uaccess_begin()/__uaccess_end() |
| ARM: PAN: uaccess_enable()/uaccess_disable() |
| |
| These functions should be called to denote a minimal critical section around |
| access to __user variables. See also: https://lwn.net/Articles/517475/ |
| |
| The intention of the warning is to prevent calls to funcB() from eventually |
| calling schedule(), potentially leaking the AC flags state, and not |
| restoring them correctly. |
| |
| It also helps verify that there are no unexpected calls to funcB() which may |
| access user space pages with protections against doing so disabled. |
| |
| To fix, either: |
| 1) remove explicit calls to funcB() from funcA(). |
| 2) add the correct guards before and after calls to low level functions like |
| __get_user_size()/__put_user_size(). |
| 3) add funcB to uaccess_safe_builtin whitelist in tools/objtool/check.c, if |
| funcB obviously does not call schedule(), and is marked notrace (since |
| function tracing inserts additional calls, which is not obvious from the |
| sources). |
| |
| 10. file.o: warning: func()+0x5c: stack layout conflict in alternatives |
| |
| This means that in the use of the alternative() or ALTERNATIVE() |
| macro, the code paths have conflicting modifications to the stack. |
| The problem is that there is only one ORC unwind table, which means |
| that the ORC unwind entries must be consistent for all possible |
| instruction boundaries regardless of which code has been patched. |
| This limitation can be overcome by massaging the alternatives with |
| NOPs to shift the stack changes around so they no longer conflict. |
| |
| 11. file.o: warning: unannotated intra-function call |
| |
| This warning means that a direct call is done to a destination which |
| is not at the beginning of a function. If this is a legit call, you |
| can remove this warning by putting the ANNOTATE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALL |
| directive right before the call. |
| |
| 12. file.o: warning: func(): not an indirect call target |
| |
| This means that objtool is running with --ibt and a function expected |
| to be an indirect call target is not. In particular, this happens for |
| init_module() or cleanup_module() if a module relies on these special |
| names and does not use module_init() / module_exit() macros to create |
| them. |
| |
| |
| If the error doesn't seem to make sense, it could be a bug in objtool. |
| Feel free to ask the objtool maintainer for help. |
| |
| |
| Adding exceptions |
| ----------------- |
| |
| If you _really_ need objtool to ignore something, and are 100% sure |
| that it won't affect kernel stack traces, you can tell objtool to |
| ignore it: |
| |
| - To skip validation of a function, use the STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD |
| macro. |
| |
| - To skip validation of a file, add |
| |
| OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD_filename.o := y |
| |
| to the Makefile. |
| |
| - To skip validation of a directory, add |
| |
| OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD := y |
| |
| to the Makefile. |
| |
| NOTE: OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD doesn't work for link time validation of |
| vmlinux.o or a linked module. So it should only be used for files which |
| aren't linked into vmlinux or a module. |