| ===================== |
| CFS Bandwidth Control |
| ===================== |
| |
| .. note:: |
| This document only discusses CPU bandwidth control for SCHED_NORMAL. |
| The SCHED_RT case is covered in Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.rst |
| |
| CFS bandwidth control is a CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED extension which allows the |
| specification of the maximum CPU bandwidth available to a group or hierarchy. |
| |
| The bandwidth allowed for a group is specified using a quota and period. Within |
| each given "period" (microseconds), a task group is allocated up to "quota" |
| microseconds of CPU time. That quota is assigned to per-cpu run queues in |
| slices as threads in the cgroup become runnable. Once all quota has been |
| assigned any additional requests for quota will result in those threads being |
| throttled. Throttled threads will not be able to run again until the next |
| period when the quota is replenished. |
| |
| A group's unassigned quota is globally tracked, being refreshed back to |
| cfs_quota units at each period boundary. As threads consume this bandwidth it |
| is transferred to cpu-local "silos" on a demand basis. The amount transferred |
| within each of these updates is tunable and described as the "slice". |
| |
| Burst feature |
| ------------- |
| This feature borrows time now against our future underrun, at the cost of |
| increased interference against the other system users. All nicely bounded. |
| |
| Traditional (UP-EDF) bandwidth control is something like: |
| |
| (U = \Sum u_i) <= 1 |
| |
| This guaranteeds both that every deadline is met and that the system is |
| stable. After all, if U were > 1, then for every second of walltime, |
| we'd have to run more than a second of program time, and obviously miss |
| our deadline, but the next deadline will be further out still, there is |
| never time to catch up, unbounded fail. |
| |
| The burst feature observes that a workload doesn't always executes the full |
| quota; this enables one to describe u_i as a statistical distribution. |
| |
| For example, have u_i = {x,e}_i, where x is the p(95) and x+e p(100) |
| (the traditional WCET). This effectively allows u to be smaller, |
| increasing the efficiency (we can pack more tasks in the system), but at |
| the cost of missing deadlines when all the odds line up. However, it |
| does maintain stability, since every overrun must be paired with an |
| underrun as long as our x is above the average. |
| |
| That is, suppose we have 2 tasks, both specify a p(95) value, then we |
| have a p(95)*p(95) = 90.25% chance both tasks are within their quota and |
| everything is good. At the same time we have a p(5)p(5) = 0.25% chance |
| both tasks will exceed their quota at the same time (guaranteed deadline |
| fail). Somewhere in between there's a threshold where one exceeds and |
| the other doesn't underrun enough to compensate; this depends on the |
| specific CDFs. |
| |
| At the same time, we can say that the worst case deadline miss, will be |
| \Sum e_i; that is, there is a bounded tardiness (under the assumption |
| that x+e is indeed WCET). |
| |
| The interferenece when using burst is valued by the possibilities for |
| missing the deadline and the average WCET. Test results showed that when |
| there many cgroups or CPU is under utilized, the interference is |
| limited. More details are shown in: |
| https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5371BD36-55AE-4F71-B9D7-B86DC32E3D2B@linux.alibaba.com/ |
| |
| Management |
| ---------- |
| Quota, period and burst are managed within the cpu subsystem via cgroupfs. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| The cgroupfs files described in this section are only applicable |
| to cgroup v1. For cgroup v2, see |
| :ref:`Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst <cgroup-v2-cpu>`. |
| |
| - cpu.cfs_quota_us: the total available run-time within a period (in |
| - cpu.cfs_quota_us: run-time replenished within a period (in microseconds) |
| - cpu.cfs_period_us: the length of a period (in microseconds) |
| - cpu.stat: exports throttling statistics [explained further below] |
| - cpu.cfs_burst_us: the maximum accumulated run-time (in microseconds) |
| |
| The default values are:: |
| |
| cpu.cfs_period_us=100ms |
| cpu.cfs_quota_us=-1 |
| cpu.cfs_burst_us=0 |
| |
| A value of -1 for cpu.cfs_quota_us indicates that the group does not have any |
| bandwidth restriction in place, such a group is described as an unconstrained |
| bandwidth group. This represents the traditional work-conserving behavior for |
| CFS. |
| |
| Writing any (valid) positive value(s) no smaller than cpu.cfs_burst_us will |
| enact the specified bandwidth limit. The minimum quota allowed for the quota or |
| period is 1ms. There is also an upper bound on the period length of 1s. |
| Additional restrictions exist when bandwidth limits are used in a hierarchical |
| fashion, these are explained in more detail below. |
| |
| Writing any negative value to cpu.cfs_quota_us will remove the bandwidth limit |
| and return the group to an unconstrained state once more. |
| |
| A value of 0 for cpu.cfs_burst_us indicates that the group can not accumulate |
| any unused bandwidth. It makes the traditional bandwidth control behavior for |
| CFS unchanged. Writing any (valid) positive value(s) no larger than |
| cpu.cfs_quota_us into cpu.cfs_burst_us will enact the cap on unused bandwidth |
| accumulation. |
| |
| Any updates to a group's bandwidth specification will result in it becoming |
| unthrottled if it is in a constrained state. |
| |
| System wide settings |
| -------------------- |
| For efficiency run-time is transferred between the global pool and CPU local |
| "silos" in a batch fashion. This greatly reduces global accounting pressure |
| on large systems. The amount transferred each time such an update is required |
| is described as the "slice". |
| |
| This is tunable via procfs:: |
| |
| /proc/sys/kernel/sched_cfs_bandwidth_slice_us (default=5ms) |
| |
| Larger slice values will reduce transfer overheads, while smaller values allow |
| for more fine-grained consumption. |
| |
| Statistics |
| ---------- |
| A group's bandwidth statistics are exported via 5 fields in cpu.stat. |
| |
| cpu.stat: |
| |
| - nr_periods: Number of enforcement intervals that have elapsed. |
| - nr_throttled: Number of times the group has been throttled/limited. |
| - throttled_time: The total time duration (in nanoseconds) for which entities |
| of the group have been throttled. |
| - nr_bursts: Number of periods burst occurs. |
| - burst_time: Cumulative wall-time (in nanoseconds) that any CPUs has used |
| above quota in respective periods |
| |
| This interface is read-only. |
| |
| Hierarchical considerations |
| --------------------------- |
| The interface enforces that an individual entity's bandwidth is always |
| attainable, that is: max(c_i) <= C. However, over-subscription in the |
| aggregate case is explicitly allowed to enable work-conserving semantics |
| within a hierarchy: |
| |
| e.g. \Sum (c_i) may exceed C |
| |
| [ Where C is the parent's bandwidth, and c_i its children ] |
| |
| |
| There are two ways in which a group may become throttled: |
| |
| a. it fully consumes its own quota within a period |
| b. a parent's quota is fully consumed within its period |
| |
| In case b) above, even though the child may have runtime remaining it will not |
| be allowed to until the parent's runtime is refreshed. |
| |
| CFS Bandwidth Quota Caveats |
| --------------------------- |
| Once a slice is assigned to a cpu it does not expire. However all but 1ms of |
| the slice may be returned to the global pool if all threads on that cpu become |
| unrunnable. This is configured at compile time by the min_cfs_rq_runtime |
| variable. This is a performance tweak that helps prevent added contention on |
| the global lock. |
| |
| The fact that cpu-local slices do not expire results in some interesting corner |
| cases that should be understood. |
| |
| For cgroup cpu constrained applications that are cpu limited this is a |
| relatively moot point because they will naturally consume the entirety of their |
| quota as well as the entirety of each cpu-local slice in each period. As a |
| result it is expected that nr_periods roughly equal nr_throttled, and that |
| cpuacct.usage will increase roughly equal to cfs_quota_us in each period. |
| |
| For highly-threaded, non-cpu bound applications this non-expiration nuance |
| allows applications to briefly burst past their quota limits by the amount of |
| unused slice on each cpu that the task group is running on (typically at most |
| 1ms per cpu or as defined by min_cfs_rq_runtime). This slight burst only |
| applies if quota had been assigned to a cpu and then not fully used or returned |
| in previous periods. This burst amount will not be transferred between cores. |
| As a result, this mechanism still strictly limits the task group to quota |
| average usage, albeit over a longer time window than a single period. This |
| also limits the burst ability to no more than 1ms per cpu. This provides |
| better more predictable user experience for highly threaded applications with |
| small quota limits on high core count machines. It also eliminates the |
| propensity to throttle these applications while simultanously using less than |
| quota amounts of cpu. Another way to say this, is that by allowing the unused |
| portion of a slice to remain valid across periods we have decreased the |
| possibility of wastefully expiring quota on cpu-local silos that don't need a |
| full slice's amount of cpu time. |
| |
| The interaction between cpu-bound and non-cpu-bound-interactive applications |
| should also be considered, especially when single core usage hits 100%. If you |
| gave each of these applications half of a cpu-core and they both got scheduled |
| on the same CPU it is theoretically possible that the non-cpu bound application |
| will use up to 1ms additional quota in some periods, thereby preventing the |
| cpu-bound application from fully using its quota by that same amount. In these |
| instances it will be up to the CFS algorithm (see sched-design-CFS.rst) to |
| decide which application is chosen to run, as they will both be runnable and |
| have remaining quota. This runtime discrepancy will be made up in the following |
| periods when the interactive application idles. |
| |
| Examples |
| -------- |
| 1. Limit a group to 1 CPU worth of runtime:: |
| |
| If period is 250ms and quota is also 250ms, the group will get |
| 1 CPU worth of runtime every 250ms. |
| |
| # echo 250000 > cpu.cfs_quota_us /* quota = 250ms */ |
| # echo 250000 > cpu.cfs_period_us /* period = 250ms */ |
| |
| 2. Limit a group to 2 CPUs worth of runtime on a multi-CPU machine |
| |
| With 500ms period and 1000ms quota, the group can get 2 CPUs worth of |
| runtime every 500ms:: |
| |
| # echo 1000000 > cpu.cfs_quota_us /* quota = 1000ms */ |
| # echo 500000 > cpu.cfs_period_us /* period = 500ms */ |
| |
| The larger period here allows for increased burst capacity. |
| |
| 3. Limit a group to 20% of 1 CPU. |
| |
| With 50ms period, 10ms quota will be equivalent to 20% of 1 CPU:: |
| |
| # echo 10000 > cpu.cfs_quota_us /* quota = 10ms */ |
| # echo 50000 > cpu.cfs_period_us /* period = 50ms */ |
| |
| By using a small period here we are ensuring a consistent latency |
| response at the expense of burst capacity. |
| |
| 4. Limit a group to 40% of 1 CPU, and allow accumulate up to 20% of 1 CPU |
| additionally, in case accumulation has been done. |
| |
| With 50ms period, 20ms quota will be equivalent to 40% of 1 CPU. |
| And 10ms burst will be equivalent to 20% of 1 CPU. |
| |
| # echo 20000 > cpu.cfs_quota_us /* quota = 20ms */ |
| # echo 50000 > cpu.cfs_period_us /* period = 50ms */ |
| # echo 10000 > cpu.cfs_burst_us /* burst = 10ms */ |
| |
| Larger buffer setting (no larger than quota) allows greater burst capacity. |