| ===================== |
| GPIO Driver Interface |
| ===================== |
| |
| This document serves as a guide for writers of GPIO chip drivers. |
| |
| Each GPIO controller driver needs to include the following header, which defines |
| the structures used to define a GPIO driver:: |
| |
| #include <linux/gpio/driver.h> |
| |
| |
| Internal Representation of GPIOs |
| ================================ |
| |
| A GPIO chip handles one or more GPIO lines. To be considered a GPIO chip, the |
| lines must conform to the definition: General Purpose Input/Output. If the |
| line is not general purpose, it is not GPIO and should not be handled by a |
| GPIO chip. The use case is the indicative: certain lines in a system may be |
| called GPIO but serve a very particular purpose thus not meeting the criteria |
| of a general purpose I/O. On the other hand a LED driver line may be used as a |
| GPIO and should therefore still be handled by a GPIO chip driver. |
| |
| Inside a GPIO driver, individual GPIO lines are identified by their hardware |
| number, sometime also referred to as ``offset``, which is a unique number |
| between 0 and n-1, n being the number of GPIOs managed by the chip. |
| |
| The hardware GPIO number should be something intuitive to the hardware, for |
| example if a system uses a memory-mapped set of I/O-registers where 32 GPIO |
| lines are handled by one bit per line in a 32-bit register, it makes sense to |
| use hardware offsets 0..31 for these, corresponding to bits 0..31 in the |
| register. |
| |
| This number is purely internal: the hardware number of a particular GPIO |
| line is never made visible outside of the driver. |
| |
| On top of this internal number, each GPIO line also needs to have a global |
| number in the integer GPIO namespace so that it can be used with the legacy GPIO |
| interface. Each chip must thus have a "base" number (which can be automatically |
| assigned), and for each GPIO line the global number will be (base + hardware |
| number). Although the integer representation is considered deprecated, it still |
| has many users and thus needs to be maintained. |
| |
| So for example one platform could use global numbers 32-159 for GPIOs, with a |
| controller defining 128 GPIOs at a "base" of 32 ; while another platform uses |
| global numbers 0..63 with one set of GPIO controllers, 64-79 with another type |
| of GPIO controller, and on one particular board 80-95 with an FPGA. The legacy |
| numbers need not be contiguous; either of those platforms could also use numbers |
| 2000-2063 to identify GPIO lines in a bank of I2C GPIO expanders. |
| |
| |
| Controller Drivers: gpio_chip |
| ============================= |
| |
| In the gpiolib framework each GPIO controller is packaged as a "struct |
| gpio_chip" (see <linux/gpio/driver.h> for its complete definition) with members |
| common to each controller of that type, these should be assigned by the |
| driver code: |
| |
| - methods to establish GPIO line direction |
| - methods used to access GPIO line values |
| - method to set electrical configuration for a given GPIO line |
| - method to return the IRQ number associated to a given GPIO line |
| - flag saying whether calls to its methods may sleep |
| - optional line names array to identify lines |
| - optional debugfs dump method (showing extra state information) |
| - optional base number (will be automatically assigned if omitted) |
| - optional label for diagnostics and GPIO chip mapping using platform data |
| |
| The code implementing a gpio_chip should support multiple instances of the |
| controller, preferably using the driver model. That code will configure each |
| gpio_chip and issue gpiochip_add_data() or devm_gpiochip_add_data(). Removing |
| a GPIO controller should be rare; use gpiochip_remove() when it is unavoidable. |
| |
| Often a gpio_chip is part of an instance-specific structure with states not |
| exposed by the GPIO interfaces, such as addressing, power management, and more. |
| Chips such as audio codecs will have complex non-GPIO states. |
| |
| Any debugfs dump method should normally ignore lines which haven't been |
| requested. They can use gpiochip_is_requested(), which returns either |
| NULL or the label associated with that GPIO line when it was requested. |
| |
| Realtime considerations: the GPIO driver should not use spinlock_t or any |
| sleepable APIs (like PM runtime) in its gpio_chip implementation (.get/.set |
| and direction control callbacks) if it is expected to call GPIO APIs from |
| atomic context on realtime kernels (inside hard IRQ handlers and similar |
| contexts). Normally this should not be required. |
| |
| |
| GPIO electrical configuration |
| ----------------------------- |
| |
| GPIO lines can be configured for several electrical modes of operation by using |
| the .set_config() callback. Currently this API supports setting: |
| |
| - Debouncing |
| - Single-ended modes (open drain/open source) |
| - Pull up and pull down resistor enablement |
| |
| These settings are described below. |
| |
| The .set_config() callback uses the same enumerators and configuration |
| semantics as the generic pin control drivers. This is not a coincidence: it is |
| possible to assign the .set_config() to the function gpiochip_generic_config() |
| which will result in pinctrl_gpio_set_config() being called and eventually |
| ending up in the pin control back-end "behind" the GPIO controller, usually |
| closer to the actual pins. This way the pin controller can manage the below |
| listed GPIO configurations. |
| |
| If a pin controller back-end is used, the GPIO controller or hardware |
| description needs to provide "GPIO ranges" mapping the GPIO line offsets to pin |
| numbers on the pin controller so they can properly cross-reference each other. |
| |
| |
| GPIO lines with debounce support |
| -------------------------------- |
| |
| Debouncing is a configuration set to a pin indicating that it is connected to |
| a mechanical switch or button, or similar that may bounce. Bouncing means the |
| line is pulled high/low quickly at very short intervals for mechanical |
| reasons. This can result in the value being unstable or irqs firing repeatedly |
| unless the line is debounced. |
| |
| Debouncing in practice involves setting up a timer when something happens on |
| the line, wait a little while and then sample the line again, so see if it |
| still has the same value (low or high). This could also be repeated by a clever |
| state machine, waiting for a line to become stable. In either case, it sets |
| a certain number of milliseconds for debouncing, or just "on/off" if that time |
| is not configurable. |
| |
| |
| GPIO lines with open drain/source support |
| ----------------------------------------- |
| |
| Open drain (CMOS) or open collector (TTL) means the line is not actively driven |
| high: instead you provide the drain/collector as output, so when the transistor |
| is not open, it will present a high-impedance (tristate) to the external rail:: |
| |
| |
| CMOS CONFIGURATION TTL CONFIGURATION |
| |
| ||--- out +--- out |
| in ----|| |/ |
| ||--+ in ----| |
| | |\ |
| GND GND |
| |
| This configuration is normally used as a way to achieve one of two things: |
| |
| - Level-shifting: to reach a logical level higher than that of the silicon |
| where the output resides. |
| |
| - Inverse wire-OR on an I/O line, for example a GPIO line, making it possible |
| for any driving stage on the line to drive it low even if any other output |
| to the same line is simultaneously driving it high. A special case of this |
| is driving the SCL and SDA lines of an I2C bus, which is by definition a |
| wire-OR bus. |
| |
| Both use cases require that the line be equipped with a pull-up resistor. This |
| resistor will make the line tend to high level unless one of the transistors on |
| the rail actively pulls it down. |
| |
| The level on the line will go as high as the VDD on the pull-up resistor, which |
| may be higher than the level supported by the transistor, achieving a |
| level-shift to the higher VDD. |
| |
| Integrated electronics often have an output driver stage in the form of a CMOS |
| "totem-pole" with one N-MOS and one P-MOS transistor where one of them drives |
| the line high and one of them drives the line low. This is called a push-pull |
| output. The "totem-pole" looks like so:: |
| |
| VDD |
| | |
| OD ||--+ |
| +--/ ---o|| P-MOS-FET |
| | ||--+ |
| IN --+ +----- out |
| | ||--+ |
| +--/ ----|| N-MOS-FET |
| OS ||--+ |
| | |
| GND |
| |
| The desired output signal (e.g. coming directly from some GPIO output register) |
| arrives at IN. The switches named "OD" and "OS" are normally closed, creating |
| a push-pull circuit. |
| |
| Consider the little "switches" named "OD" and "OS" that enable/disable the |
| P-MOS or N-MOS transistor right after the split of the input. As you can see, |
| either transistor will go totally numb if this switch is open. The totem-pole |
| is then halved and give high impedance instead of actively driving the line |
| high or low respectively. That is usually how software-controlled open |
| drain/source works. |
| |
| Some GPIO hardware come in open drain / open source configuration. Some are |
| hard-wired lines that will only support open drain or open source no matter |
| what: there is only one transistor there. Some are software-configurable: |
| by flipping a bit in a register the output can be configured as open drain |
| or open source, in practice by flicking open the switches labeled "OD" and "OS" |
| in the drawing above. |
| |
| By disabling the P-MOS transistor, the output can be driven between GND and |
| high impedance (open drain), and by disabling the N-MOS transistor, the output |
| can be driven between VDD and high impedance (open source). In the first case, |
| a pull-up resistor is needed on the outgoing rail to complete the circuit, and |
| in the second case, a pull-down resistor is needed on the rail. |
| |
| Hardware that supports open drain or open source or both, can implement a |
| special callback in the gpio_chip: .set_config() that takes a generic |
| pinconf packed value telling whether to configure the line as open drain, |
| open source or push-pull. This will happen in response to the |
| GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN or GPIO_OPEN_SOURCE flag set in the machine file, or coming |
| from other hardware descriptions. |
| |
| If this state can not be configured in hardware, i.e. if the GPIO hardware does |
| not support open drain/open source in hardware, the GPIO library will instead |
| use a trick: when a line is set as output, if the line is flagged as open |
| drain, and the IN output value is low, it will be driven low as usual. But |
| if the IN output value is set to high, it will instead *NOT* be driven high, |
| instead it will be switched to input, as input mode is an equivalent to |
| high impedance, thus achieving an "open drain emulation" of sorts: electrically |
| the behaviour will be identical, with the exception of possible hardware glitches |
| when switching the mode of the line. |
| |
| For open source configuration the same principle is used, just that instead |
| of actively driving the line low, it is set to input. |
| |
| |
| GPIO lines with pull up/down resistor support |
| --------------------------------------------- |
| |
| A GPIO line can support pull-up/down using the .set_config() callback. This |
| means that a pull up or pull-down resistor is available on the output of the |
| GPIO line, and this resistor is software controlled. |
| |
| In discrete designs, a pull-up or pull-down resistor is simply soldered on |
| the circuit board. This is not something we deal with or model in software. The |
| most you will think about these lines is that they will very likely be |
| configured as open drain or open source (see the section above). |
| |
| The .set_config() callback can only turn pull up or down on and off, and will |
| no have any semantic knowledge about the resistance used. It will only say |
| switch a bit in a register enabling or disabling pull-up or pull-down. |
| |
| If the GPIO line supports shunting in different resistance values for the |
| pull-up or pull-down resistor, the GPIO chip callback .set_config() will not |
| suffice. For these complex use cases, a combined GPIO chip and pin controller |
| need to be implemented, as the pin config interface of a pin controller |
| supports more versatile control over electrical properties and can handle |
| different pull-up or pull-down resistance values. |
| |
| |
| GPIO drivers providing IRQs |
| =========================== |
| |
| It is custom that GPIO drivers (GPIO chips) are also providing interrupts, |
| most often cascaded off a parent interrupt controller, and in some special |
| cases the GPIO logic is melded with a SoC's primary interrupt controller. |
| |
| The IRQ portions of the GPIO block are implemented using an irq_chip, using |
| the header <linux/irq.h>. So this combined driver is utilizing two sub- |
| systems simultaneously: gpio and irq. |
| |
| It is legal for any IRQ consumer to request an IRQ from any irqchip even if it |
| is a combined GPIO+IRQ driver. The basic premise is that gpio_chip and |
| irq_chip are orthogonal, and offering their services independent of each |
| other. |
| |
| gpiod_to_irq() is just a convenience function to figure out the IRQ for a |
| certain GPIO line and should not be relied upon to have been called before |
| the IRQ is used. |
| |
| Always prepare the hardware and make it ready for action in respective |
| callbacks from the GPIO and irq_chip APIs. Do not rely on gpiod_to_irq() having |
| been called first. |
| |
| We can divide GPIO irqchips in two broad categories: |
| |
| - CASCADED INTERRUPT CHIPS: this means that the GPIO chip has one common |
| interrupt output line, which is triggered by any enabled GPIO line on that |
| chip. The interrupt output line will then be routed to an parent interrupt |
| controller one level up, in the most simple case the systems primary |
| interrupt controller. This is modeled by an irqchip that will inspect bits |
| inside the GPIO controller to figure out which line fired it. The irqchip |
| part of the driver needs to inspect registers to figure this out and it |
| will likely also need to acknowledge that it is handling the interrupt |
| by clearing some bit (sometime implicitly, by just reading a status |
| register) and it will often need to set up the configuration such as |
| edge sensitivity (rising or falling edge, or high/low level interrupt for |
| example). |
| |
| - HIERARCHICAL INTERRUPT CHIPS: this means that each GPIO line has a dedicated |
| irq line to a parent interrupt controller one level up. There is no need |
| to inquire the GPIO hardware to figure out which line has fired, but it |
| may still be necessary to acknowledge the interrupt and set up configuration |
| such as edge sensitivity. |
| |
| Realtime considerations: a realtime compliant GPIO driver should not use |
| spinlock_t or any sleepable APIs (like PM runtime) as part of its irqchip |
| implementation. |
| |
| - spinlock_t should be replaced with raw_spinlock_t.[1] |
| - If sleepable APIs have to be used, these can be done from the .irq_bus_lock() |
| and .irq_bus_unlock() callbacks, as these are the only slowpath callbacks |
| on an irqchip. Create the callbacks if needed.[2] |
| |
| |
| Cascaded GPIO irqchips |
| ---------------------- |
| |
| Cascaded GPIO irqchips usually fall in one of three categories: |
| |
| - CHAINED CASCADED GPIO IRQCHIPS: these are usually the type that is embedded on |
| an SoC. This means that there is a fast IRQ flow handler for the GPIOs that |
| gets called in a chain from the parent IRQ handler, most typically the |
| system interrupt controller. This means that the GPIO irqchip handler will |
| be called immediately from the parent irqchip, while holding the IRQs |
| disabled. The GPIO irqchip will then end up calling something like this |
| sequence in its interrupt handler:: |
| |
| static irqreturn_t foo_gpio_irq(int irq, void *data) |
| chained_irq_enter(...); |
| generic_handle_irq(...); |
| chained_irq_exit(...); |
| |
| Chained GPIO irqchips typically can NOT set the .can_sleep flag on |
| struct gpio_chip, as everything happens directly in the callbacks: no |
| slow bus traffic like I2C can be used. |
| |
| Realtime considerations: Note that chained IRQ handlers will not be forced |
| threaded on -RT. As a result, spinlock_t or any sleepable APIs (like PM |
| runtime) can't be used in a chained IRQ handler. |
| |
| If required (and if it can't be converted to the nested threaded GPIO irqchip, |
| see below) a chained IRQ handler can be converted to generic irq handler and |
| this way it will become a threaded IRQ handler on -RT and a hard IRQ handler |
| on non-RT (for example, see [3]). |
| |
| The generic_handle_irq() is expected to be called with IRQ disabled, |
| so the IRQ core will complain if it is called from an IRQ handler which is |
| forced to a thread. The "fake?" raw lock can be used to work around this |
| problem:: |
| |
| raw_spinlock_t wa_lock; |
| static irqreturn_t omap_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *gpiobank) |
| unsigned long wa_lock_flags; |
| raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->wa_lock, wa_lock_flags); |
| generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(bank->chip.irq.domain, bit)); |
| raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->wa_lock, wa_lock_flags); |
| |
| - GENERIC CHAINED GPIO IRQCHIPS: these are the same as "CHAINED GPIO irqchips", |
| but chained IRQ handlers are not used. Instead GPIO IRQs dispatching is |
| performed by generic IRQ handler which is configured using request_irq(). |
| The GPIO irqchip will then end up calling something like this sequence in |
| its interrupt handler:: |
| |
| static irqreturn_t gpio_rcar_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) |
| for each detected GPIO IRQ |
| generic_handle_irq(...); |
| |
| Realtime considerations: this kind of handlers will be forced threaded on -RT, |
| and as result the IRQ core will complain that generic_handle_irq() is called |
| with IRQ enabled and the same work-around as for "CHAINED GPIO irqchips" can |
| be applied. |
| |
| - NESTED THREADED GPIO IRQCHIPS: these are off-chip GPIO expanders and any |
| other GPIO irqchip residing on the other side of a sleeping bus such as I2C |
| or SPI. |
| |
| Of course such drivers that need slow bus traffic to read out IRQ status and |
| similar, traffic which may in turn incur other IRQs to happen, cannot be |
| handled in a quick IRQ handler with IRQs disabled. Instead they need to spawn |
| a thread and then mask the parent IRQ line until the interrupt is handled |
| by the driver. The hallmark of this driver is to call something like |
| this in its interrupt handler:: |
| |
| static irqreturn_t foo_gpio_irq(int irq, void *data) |
| ... |
| handle_nested_irq(irq); |
| |
| The hallmark of threaded GPIO irqchips is that they set the .can_sleep |
| flag on struct gpio_chip to true, indicating that this chip may sleep |
| when accessing the GPIOs. |
| |
| These kinds of irqchips are inherently realtime tolerant as they are |
| already set up to handle sleeping contexts. |
| |
| |
| Infrastructure helpers for GPIO irqchips |
| ---------------------------------------- |
| |
| To help out in handling the set-up and management of GPIO irqchips and the |
| associated irqdomain and resource allocation callbacks. These are activated |
| by selecting the Kconfig symbol GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP. If the symbol |
| IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY is also selected, hierarchical helpers will also be |
| provided. A big portion of overhead code will be managed by gpiolib, |
| under the assumption that your interrupts are 1-to-1-mapped to the |
| GPIO line index: |
| |
| .. csv-table:: |
| :header: GPIO line offset, Hardware IRQ |
| |
| 0,0 |
| 1,1 |
| 2,2 |
| ...,... |
| ngpio-1, ngpio-1 |
| |
| |
| If some GPIO lines do not have corresponding IRQs, the bitmask valid_mask |
| and the flag need_valid_mask in gpio_irq_chip can be used to mask off some |
| lines as invalid for associating with IRQs. |
| |
| The preferred way to set up the helpers is to fill in the |
| struct gpio_irq_chip inside struct gpio_chip before adding the gpio_chip. |
| If you do this, the additional irq_chip will be set up by gpiolib at the |
| same time as setting up the rest of the GPIO functionality. The following |
| is a typical example of a chained cascaded interrupt handler using |
| the gpio_irq_chip. Note how the mask/unmask (or disable/enable) functions |
| call into the core gpiolib code: |
| |
| .. code-block:: c |
| |
| /* Typical state container */ |
| struct my_gpio { |
| struct gpio_chip gc; |
| }; |
| |
| static void my_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d) |
| { |
| struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); |
| irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d); |
| |
| /* |
| * Perform any necessary action to mask the interrupt, |
| * and then call into the core code to synchronise the |
| * state. |
| */ |
| |
| gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, hwirq); |
| } |
| |
| static void my_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d) |
| { |
| struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); |
| irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d); |
| |
| gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, hwirq); |
| |
| /* |
| * Perform any necessary action to unmask the interrupt, |
| * after having called into the core code to synchronise |
| * the state. |
| */ |
| } |
| |
| /* |
| * Statically populate the irqchip. Note that it is made const |
| * (further indicated by the IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE flag), and that |
| * the GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPER macro adds some extra |
| * callbacks to the structure. |
| */ |
| static const struct irq_chip my_gpio_irq_chip = { |
| .name = "my_gpio_irq", |
| .irq_ack = my_gpio_ack_irq, |
| .irq_mask = my_gpio_mask_irq, |
| .irq_unmask = my_gpio_unmask_irq, |
| .irq_set_type = my_gpio_set_irq_type, |
| .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, |
| /* Provide the gpio resource callbacks */ |
| GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS, |
| }; |
| |
| int irq; /* from platform etc */ |
| struct my_gpio *g; |
| struct gpio_irq_chip *girq; |
| |
| /* Get a pointer to the gpio_irq_chip */ |
| girq = &g->gc.irq; |
| gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &my_gpio_irq_chip); |
| girq->parent_handler = ftgpio_gpio_irq_handler; |
| girq->num_parents = 1; |
| girq->parents = devm_kcalloc(dev, 1, sizeof(*girq->parents), |
| GFP_KERNEL); |
| if (!girq->parents) |
| return -ENOMEM; |
| girq->default_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE; |
| girq->handler = handle_bad_irq; |
| girq->parents[0] = irq; |
| |
| return devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &g->gc, g); |
| |
| The helper supports using threaded interrupts as well. Then you just request |
| the interrupt separately and go with it: |
| |
| .. code-block:: c |
| |
| /* Typical state container */ |
| struct my_gpio { |
| struct gpio_chip gc; |
| }; |
| |
| static void my_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d) |
| { |
| struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); |
| irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d); |
| |
| /* |
| * Perform any necessary action to mask the interrupt, |
| * and then call into the core code to synchronise the |
| * state. |
| */ |
| |
| gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, hwirq); |
| } |
| |
| static void my_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d) |
| { |
| struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); |
| irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d); |
| |
| gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, hwirq); |
| |
| /* |
| * Perform any necessary action to unmask the interrupt, |
| * after having called into the core code to synchronise |
| * the state. |
| */ |
| } |
| |
| /* |
| * Statically populate the irqchip. Note that it is made const |
| * (further indicated by the IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE flag), and that |
| * the GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPER macro adds some extra |
| * callbacks to the structure. |
| */ |
| static const struct irq_chip my_gpio_irq_chip = { |
| .name = "my_gpio_irq", |
| .irq_ack = my_gpio_ack_irq, |
| .irq_mask = my_gpio_mask_irq, |
| .irq_unmask = my_gpio_unmask_irq, |
| .irq_set_type = my_gpio_set_irq_type, |
| .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, |
| /* Provide the gpio resource callbacks */ |
| GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS, |
| }; |
| |
| int irq; /* from platform etc */ |
| struct my_gpio *g; |
| struct gpio_irq_chip *girq; |
| |
| ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL, irq_thread_fn, |
| IRQF_ONESHOT, "my-chip", g); |
| if (ret < 0) |
| return ret; |
| |
| /* Get a pointer to the gpio_irq_chip */ |
| girq = &g->gc.irq; |
| gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &my_gpio_irq_chip); |
| /* This will let us handle the parent IRQ in the driver */ |
| girq->parent_handler = NULL; |
| girq->num_parents = 0; |
| girq->parents = NULL; |
| girq->default_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE; |
| girq->handler = handle_bad_irq; |
| |
| return devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &g->gc, g); |
| |
| The helper supports using hierarchical interrupt controllers as well. |
| In this case the typical set-up will look like this: |
| |
| .. code-block:: c |
| |
| /* Typical state container with dynamic irqchip */ |
| struct my_gpio { |
| struct gpio_chip gc; |
| struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; |
| }; |
| |
| static void my_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d) |
| { |
| struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); |
| irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d); |
| |
| /* |
| * Perform any necessary action to mask the interrupt, |
| * and then call into the core code to synchronise the |
| * state. |
| */ |
| |
| gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, hwirq); |
| irq_mask_mask_parent(d); |
| } |
| |
| static void my_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d) |
| { |
| struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); |
| irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d); |
| |
| gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, hwirq); |
| |
| /* |
| * Perform any necessary action to unmask the interrupt, |
| * after having called into the core code to synchronise |
| * the state. |
| */ |
| |
| irq_mask_unmask_parent(d); |
| } |
| |
| /* |
| * Statically populate the irqchip. Note that it is made const |
| * (further indicated by the IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE flag), and that |
| * the GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPER macro adds some extra |
| * callbacks to the structure. |
| */ |
| static const struct irq_chip my_gpio_irq_chip = { |
| .name = "my_gpio_irq", |
| .irq_ack = my_gpio_ack_irq, |
| .irq_mask = my_gpio_mask_irq, |
| .irq_unmask = my_gpio_unmask_irq, |
| .irq_set_type = my_gpio_set_irq_type, |
| .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, |
| /* Provide the gpio resource callbacks */ |
| GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS, |
| }; |
| |
| struct my_gpio *g; |
| struct gpio_irq_chip *girq; |
| |
| /* Get a pointer to the gpio_irq_chip */ |
| girq = &g->gc.irq; |
| gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &my_gpio_irq_chip); |
| girq->default_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE; |
| girq->handler = handle_bad_irq; |
| girq->fwnode = g->fwnode; |
| girq->parent_domain = parent; |
| girq->child_to_parent_hwirq = my_gpio_child_to_parent_hwirq; |
| |
| return devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &g->gc, g); |
| |
| As you can see pretty similar, but you do not supply a parent handler for |
| the IRQ, instead a parent irqdomain, an fwnode for the hardware and |
| a function .child_to_parent_hwirq() that has the purpose of looking up |
| the parent hardware irq from a child (i.e. this gpio chip) hardware irq. |
| As always it is good to look at examples in the kernel tree for advice |
| on how to find the required pieces. |
| |
| If there is a need to exclude certain GPIO lines from the IRQ domain handled by |
| these helpers, we can set .irq.need_valid_mask of the gpiochip before |
| devm_gpiochip_add_data() or gpiochip_add_data() is called. This allocates an |
| .irq.valid_mask with as many bits set as there are GPIO lines in the chip, each |
| bit representing line 0..n-1. Drivers can exclude GPIO lines by clearing bits |
| from this mask. The mask can be filled in the init_valid_mask() callback |
| that is part of the struct gpio_irq_chip. |
| |
| To use the helpers please keep the following in mind: |
| |
| - Make sure to assign all relevant members of the struct gpio_chip so that |
| the irqchip can initialize. E.g. .dev and .can_sleep shall be set up |
| properly. |
| |
| - Nominally set gpio_irq_chip.handler to handle_bad_irq. Then, if your irqchip |
| is cascaded, set the handler to handle_level_irq() and/or handle_edge_irq() |
| in the irqchip .set_type() callback depending on what your controller |
| supports and what is requested by the consumer. |
| |
| |
| Locking IRQ usage |
| ----------------- |
| |
| Since GPIO and irq_chip are orthogonal, we can get conflicts between different |
| use cases. For example a GPIO line used for IRQs should be an input line, |
| it does not make sense to fire interrupts on an output GPIO. |
| |
| If there is competition inside the subsystem which side is using the |
| resource (a certain GPIO line and register for example) it needs to deny |
| certain operations and keep track of usage inside of the gpiolib subsystem. |
| |
| Input GPIOs can be used as IRQ signals. When this happens, a driver is requested |
| to mark the GPIO as being used as an IRQ:: |
| |
| int gpiochip_lock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) |
| |
| This will prevent the use of non-irq related GPIO APIs until the GPIO IRQ lock |
| is released:: |
| |
| void gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) |
| |
| When implementing an irqchip inside a GPIO driver, these two functions should |
| typically be called in the .startup() and .shutdown() callbacks from the |
| irqchip. |
| |
| When using the gpiolib irqchip helpers, these callbacks are automatically |
| assigned. |
| |
| |
| Disabling and enabling IRQs |
| --------------------------- |
| |
| In some (fringe) use cases, a driver may be using a GPIO line as input for IRQs, |
| but occasionally switch that line over to drive output and then back to being |
| an input with interrupts again. This happens on things like CEC (Consumer |
| Electronics Control). |
| |
| When a GPIO is used as an IRQ signal, then gpiolib also needs to know if |
| the IRQ is enabled or disabled. In order to inform gpiolib about this, |
| the irqchip driver should call:: |
| |
| void gpiochip_disable_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) |
| |
| This allows drivers to drive the GPIO as an output while the IRQ is |
| disabled. When the IRQ is enabled again, a driver should call:: |
| |
| void gpiochip_enable_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) |
| |
| When implementing an irqchip inside a GPIO driver, these two functions should |
| typically be called in the .irq_disable() and .irq_enable() callbacks from the |
| irqchip. |
| |
| When IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE is not advertised by the irqchip, these callbacks |
| are automatically assigned. This behaviour is deprecated and on its way |
| to be removed from the kernel. |
| |
| |
| Real-Time compliance for GPIO IRQ chips |
| --------------------------------------- |
| |
| Any provider of irqchips needs to be carefully tailored to support Real-Time |
| preemption. It is desirable that all irqchips in the GPIO subsystem keep this |
| in mind and do the proper testing to assure they are real time-enabled. |
| |
| So, pay attention on above realtime considerations in the documentation. |
| |
| The following is a checklist to follow when preparing a driver for real-time |
| compliance: |
| |
| - ensure spinlock_t is not used as part irq_chip implementation |
| - ensure that sleepable APIs are not used as part irq_chip implementation |
| If sleepable APIs have to be used, these can be done from the .irq_bus_lock() |
| and .irq_bus_unlock() callbacks |
| - Chained GPIO irqchips: ensure spinlock_t or any sleepable APIs are not used |
| from the chained IRQ handler |
| - Generic chained GPIO irqchips: take care about generic_handle_irq() calls and |
| apply corresponding work-around |
| - Chained GPIO irqchips: get rid of the chained IRQ handler and use generic irq |
| handler if possible |
| - regmap_mmio: it is possible to disable internal locking in regmap by setting |
| .disable_locking and handling the locking in the GPIO driver |
| - Test your driver with the appropriate in-kernel real-time test cases for both |
| level and edge IRQs |
| |
| * [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg120425.html |
| * [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/1443209283-20781-2-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com |
| * [3] https://lore.kernel.org/r/1443209283-20781-3-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com |
| |
| |
| Requesting self-owned GPIO pins |
| =============================== |
| |
| Sometimes it is useful to allow a GPIO chip driver to request its own GPIO |
| descriptors through the gpiolib API. A GPIO driver can use the following |
| functions to request and free descriptors:: |
| |
| struct gpio_desc *gpiochip_request_own_desc(struct gpio_desc *desc, |
| u16 hwnum, |
| const char *label, |
| enum gpiod_flags flags) |
| |
| void gpiochip_free_own_desc(struct gpio_desc *desc) |
| |
| Descriptors requested with gpiochip_request_own_desc() must be released with |
| gpiochip_free_own_desc(). |
| |
| These functions must be used with care since they do not affect module use |
| count. Do not use the functions to request gpio descriptors not owned by the |
| calling driver. |